If the right is so concerned over Hunter’s supposed 5.8 million dollar windfall from Ghina, which has never been actually documented, how come the same right has no problem with the 6.5 million dollar unexplained payment from China that Trump declared on his Income Tax returns?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...house-committee-years-legal-battles-rcna62408
Trump was President at the time of the payments where as Hunter has always been a private citizen. Trump’s payments are documented, declared by himself, although not explained, while Hunter’s is based upon innuendo
Is the right telling us it as alright for a President to receive mysterious payments from a foreign adversary but not a private citizen? Or that once again, Trump is above the law?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...house-committee-years-legal-battles-rcna62408
Trump was President at the time of the payments where as Hunter has always been a private citizen. Trump’s payments are documented, declared by himself, although not explained, while Hunter’s is based upon innuendo
Is the right telling us it as alright for a President to receive mysterious payments from a foreign adversary but not a private citizen? Or that once again, Trump is above the law?