Tinkerpeach
Member
Hey dumbass, isn't Russia that is targeting civilian with drones?????
I haven't heard that.
Why would they need to, they are winning the war.
Hey dumbass, isn't Russia that is targeting civilian with drones?????
For a short time
Now Russia will lose that stolen land
Ukraine was at war with the Russians in the Donbas region since 2014, what do you mean there was no justification for it?
In 2014 Russian backed separatists seized Ukrainian government buildings . What justified that action? Or, Russia's invasion and annexation of Crimea? There is no justification for Russia's aggression.
Ukraine has been at war with the Russians in the Donbas region since 2014 where they've murdered thousands of Russian civilians.
More than 3,000 civilians died during the fighting in Donbas between 2014 and 2022, but there is no evidence to support the claim that Ukraine committed a genocide of Russian-speaking people or ethnic Russians in Ukraine.
These people are traitors that took up arms against the Ukraine authority, and got themselves killed.
FUCK EM'- and YOU TOO!
You do realize of course that the more shit like this happens the higher the likelihood that the Ukraine won't exist 3 years from now.
A massive strike on Ukraines railroads would be my guess.
Retaliation will be on the London bridge. You heard it here first.
Since when has blowing up a bridge ever ended a war?
Nobody ever said there was a genocide.
And why do you think they took up arms against Ukraine?
Were they just bored on a Sunday afternoon?
You need to stay out of the talks and allow the adults to speak.
As always you show painful Boebert level comprehension of every discussion you enter in to.
Bridges, that are supply lines to for the enemy, are almost always one of the first things targeted in wars when a side is going on the offensive.
It is lost on you because you are stupid but the bridge being there means that area will become inaccessible or much harder to traverse without the bridge, thus why it was built.
I haven't heard that.
Why would they need to, they are winning the war.
Not really! They were opposition to the Breakup of the Soviet Union and a criminal rebel organization being financed by Russian Agents.
It would be like a bunch of Butt Hurt Englishmen, left behind here in America after the Revolutionary War, taking up arms against the new American Government!
Man, you people are nuttier than Squirrel Poop!
So the war is over then since Russia lost a bridge.
They have no way to resupply now.
Glad this is finally over.
You are totally and hopelessly detached from reality.
More stupidity from you that you do not understand a War is a battle of many minor and major wins both big and small.
Why kill a single soldier of Russia if you are Ukraine if it does not instantly win the war? Why shoot down any rockets?
Only you think the depths of your stupidity should be vocalized, when what you need to do is shut up so people do not see how stupid you are.
The reasons for the Donbas conflict are many.
Essentially it boils down to this.
They were Russian citizens and did not want to be part of Ukraine, because of that the Ukranian government targeted them with unfair laws and practices and they rebelled resulting in the deaths of thousands of their civilians.
Russia stepped in to end the bloodshed.
That is the Ukranian war in a nutshell.
Right, and you just keep lying to yourself about all that!
You want to be stupid- that is your choice.
What Putin did by invading Crimea and the Ukraine was no less an International crime, than Hitler invading Poland!
Putin is a war criminal- and needs to be hung for his crimes!
I'm not the one saying that Russia can't resupply because a bridge got blown up.
Read the whole thread.
Odds are they have fixed it already.
You are simply a CNN parrot making talking points they tell you say without actually knowing the situation.