DOJ Suddenly Removes Language from Website on Child Sex Trafficking

V

volsrock

Verified User
For some odd reason, a certain contingent of the population is trying to downplay how serious of a problem child sex trafficking has become.

This is evident by the fact that many leftists have reacted negatively to Jim Caviezel’s new movie “Sound of Freedom.”

The movie seems to have rattled many of them in a major way, which begs a serious question:

Why?

Why would anyone have a problem with Jim Caviezel bringing attention to something like this?

We can only speculate on the answer to that question of course.

However, here’s another question…

Why did the DOJ suddenly remove three sections from their areas of concern on their website on Child Sex Trafficking?

“International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” were removed from the website on May 12, 2023.

The Gateway Pundit tackled this very question:

Why did the DOJ remove “International Sex Trafficking of Minors”, “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” from the Department of Justice website under Child Sex Trafficking?

The Biden administration removed these sections on May 12, 2023.

Why would they remove these important sections?

Some Twitter users provided screenshots:

SEE TWEETS AT LINK..............

Natalie Winters discussed this with Tim Pool:

VIDEO AT LINK...............

Again I ask, why?



https://100percentfedup.com/doj-suddenly-removes-language-on-child-sex-trafficking-on-website/
 
volsrock said:
For some odd reason, a certain contingent of the population is trying to downplay how serious of a problem child sex trafficking has become.

This is evident by the fact that many leftists have reacted negatively to Jim Caviezel’s new movie “Sound of Freedom.”

The movie seems to have rattled many of them in a major way, which begs a serious question:

Why?

Why would anyone have a problem with Jim Caviezel bringing attention to something like this?

We can only speculate on the answer to that question of course.

However, here’s another question…

Why did the DOJ suddenly remove three sections from their areas of concern on their website on Child Sex Trafficking?

“International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” were removed from the website on May 12, 2023.

The Gateway Pundit tackled this very question:

Why did the DOJ remove “International Sex Trafficking of Minors”, “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” from the Department of Justice website under Child Sex Trafficking?

The Biden administration removed these sections on May 12, 2023.

Why would they remove these important sections?

Some Twitter users provided screenshots:

SEE TWEETS AT LINK..............

Natalie Winters discussed this with Tim Pool:

VIDEO AT LINK...............

Again I ask, why?



https://100percentfedup.com/doj-suddenly-removes-language-on-child-sex-trafficking-on-website/
Click to expand...

A more pertinent question is why do you rely on lying, extreme right wing websites for your info? Could it be that birds of a feather?

BTw, Caviezel is a QAnon kook supporter. As is Ballard. That’s what the objectors point to.
 
domer76 said:
A more pertinent question is why do you rely on lying, extreme right wing websites for your info? Could it be that birds of a feather?

BTw, Caviezel is a QAnon kook supporter. As is Ballard. That’s what the objectors point to.
Click to expand...

Michael Moore is a nut and a liar/ just makes shit up...your side loves to suck his cock
 
Last edited:
I don't know why those sections were removed.

I also don't know why anyone reads the DOJ/justice.gov site or cares what it says.
 
Reminds me back in the 80's when the fundy xtian nutters pulled this


A Brief History Of "Satanic Panic" In The 1980's


In the 1980s, allegations of ritual abuse at a preschool in Southern California led to the longest, most expensive trial in U.S. history. The McMartin Preschool case — which resulted in zero convictions — became emblematic of a much more widespread phenomenon known as Satanic Panic.

https://gizmodo.com/a-brief-history-of-satanic-panic-in-the-1980s-1679476373
 
volsrock said:
Michael Moore is a nut and a liar/ just makes shit up...your side loves to suck his cock
Click to expand...

I don’t give a flying shit about Michael Moore.

Back to the question. Why do you continue to reference lying, extreme RW websites? Do you enjoy bring lied to or is it merely confirmational bias for another extreme RW liar?
 
volsrock said:
Why are Libs against this film? If it was a film on the KKK or Proud Boys they would be all for it!
Click to expand...

Because they support this kind of shit:


FzudeCEacAADDnF
 
volsrock said:
For some odd reason, a certain contingent of the population is trying to downplay how serious of a problem child sex trafficking has become.

This is evident by the fact that many leftists have reacted negatively to Jim Caviezel’s new movie “Sound of Freedom.”

The movie seems to have rattled many of them in a major way, which begs a serious question:

Why?

Why would anyone have a problem with Jim Caviezel bringing attention to something like this?

We can only speculate on the answer to that question of course.

However, here’s another question…

Why did the DOJ suddenly remove three sections from their areas of concern on their website on Child Sex Trafficking?

“International Sex Trafficking of Minors,” “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” were removed from the website on May 12, 2023.

The Gateway Pundit tackled this very question:

Why did the DOJ remove “International Sex Trafficking of Minors”, “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors” and “Child Victims of Prostitution” from the Department of Justice website under Child Sex Trafficking?

The Biden administration removed these sections on May 12, 2023.

Why would they remove these important sections?

Some Twitter users provided screenshots:

SEE TWEETS AT LINK..............

Natalie Winters discussed this with Tim Pool:

VIDEO AT LINK...............

Again I ask, why?



https://100percentfedup.com/doj-suddenly-removes-language-on-child-sex-trafficking-on-website/
Click to expand...

Do you ever discuss anything but the most trivial stuff you can find?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top