Most voters say Hunter Biden got sweetheart deal because of dad Joe, poll shows

so you approve of selective prosecution against people you hate. got it, you unamerican fucker

Negative, but I can see why a WSE such as yourself would believe that is true. After all, you supported the violent overthrow of the US Congress on 1/6. You've stated in the past that you support the overthrow of State and Federal governments to "restore" the Constitution.
 
your link is biased. my research shows differently. this is nothing more than an attempt to excuse DOJs leniency against hunter

"your research" FLOL.

What a clown you are. Share 'your research' then as this is not 'bias' this is a 30 year public defender and Judge both saying, in their career dealing with these issues Jail is not common for this offense.

....

The charge has also recently been used against white supremacists when their conduct did not provide an obvious violation of any other criminal statute, including against a white supremacist who was arrested in Washington, D.C., and found with a stash of weapons after his brother died by suicide. In that case, a federal public defender who had been working for 30 years said he “never had a case in which the government went forward" with the addict-in-possession charge. A judge concurred that the charge was unusual. The white supremacist was ultimately sentenced to time served after less than a year behind bars....

So a white supremist...

...who was a drug addict...

... who was caught with stash of weapons...


Got 'time served' as the judge found it unusual, for such a person to serve any time for "addict-in-possession' charges.

So who GAF what your 'research shows' when this judge and lawyer are giving you the HISTORY from their actual vast job experience.
 
Negative, but I can see why a WSE such as yourself would believe that is true. After all, you supported the violent overthrow of the US Congress on 1/6. You've stated in the past that you support the overthrow of State and Federal governments to "restore" the Constitution.

negative, but I can see how a wussified loser such as yourself would believe that is true........except for your last sentence, which is about 98% true. The rest is just a leftist hate filled delusion in your addled mind.
 
"your research" FLOL.

What a clown you are. Share 'your research' then as this is not 'bias' this is a 30 year public defender and Judge both saying, in their career dealing with these issues Jail is not common for this offense.



So a white supremist...

...who was a drug addict...

... who was caught with stash of weapons...


Got 'time served' as the judge found it unusual, for such a person to serve any time for "addict-in-possession' charges.

So who GAF what your 'research shows' when this judge and lawyer are giving you the HISTORY from their actual vast job experience.

whatever, statist fuckstick. swallow your leftist government supplied koolaid. :good4u:
 
so you approve of selective prosecution against people you hate. got it, you unamerican fucker

hey DumberthanYou, you kind of missed the point in that one.

There is no 'selective prosecution' if you are correct and its normal to prosecute that crime.

You calling it 'selective prosecution' means you are acknowledging that it not usually charged and is being used selectively against 'white supremist' and 'Hunter Biden' when it would not typically be used.


Being Dumberthanyou, you did not realize you are making that argument, did you?
 
hey DumberthanYou, you kind of missed the point in that one.

There is no 'selective prosecution' if you are correct and its normal to prosecute that crime.

You calling it 'selective prosecution' means you are acknowledging that it not usually charged and is being used selectively against 'white supremist' and 'Hunter Biden' when it would not typically be used.


Being Dumberthanyou, you did not realize you are making that argument, did you?

you're obviously 'dumber' since you ignored the entire point of the post in order to paint the leftist lies you need.
 
negative, but I can see how a wussified loser such as yourself would believe that is true........except for your last sentence, which is about 98% true. The rest is just a leftist hate filled delusion in your addled mind.
Thanks for agreeing you supported the overthrow of both Texas and the US government.

The fact you removed your "threeper" tags and signature after 1/6 says more about you than your 59,000 posts, most of which were anti-American and supportive of White Supremacist Extremist groups.

Example:
child, I'm one of those most suited for a civil war..........better find a bunker to hide in when it starts
you're a pussy. no one gives a shit
you will
 
Thanks for agreeing you supported the overthrow of both Texas and the US government.

The fact you removed your "threeper" tags and signature after 1/6 says more about you than your 59,000 posts, most of which were anti-American and supportive of White Supremacist Extremist groups.
more bullshit leftie assumptions. why do you hate so much?
 
I AM MILITIA
HATING EVERYTHING FED
HATING LIBERALS​
Yes, DtM, you've posted before you'd murder Federal agents or anyone who informed on you to the Federal government. You're an Oath Breaker and a traitor....at least on JPP. If you are one IRL, I hope you go to prison for it.

you were never taught the difference between innocent civilian and collaberator...............and it shows.

i don't think you were ever a marine.........you simply don't display that brotherhood.........

i'm good, though......my new unit has been together a while...we'd know if there was a traitorous government fuckstick among us....he'd have been disappeared already
 
Yes, DtM, you've posted before you'd murder Federal agents or anyone who informed on you to the Federal government. You're an Oath Breaker and a traitor....at least on JPP. If you are one IRL, I hope you go to prison for it.

one mans freedom fighter.......but we already know the side you stand on.

292720166_415198517313333_3487208543230126967_n.jpg
 
you're obviously 'dumber' since you ignored the entire point of the post in order to paint the leftist lies you need.

No the point is you are now asking others...

'do you approve of the use of this selective prosecution against the white supremacists'...

Which means you see it as ...wait for it... WAIT FOR IT...

That the prosecution of this crime IS SELECTIVE and thus not normal to charge.

Which means you think it selective and not normal to charge Hunter with it too.
 
No the point is you are now asking others...

'do you approve of the use of this selective prosecution against the white supremacists'...

Which means you see it as ...wait for it... WAIT FOR IT...

That the prosecution of this crime IS SELECTIVE and thus not normal to charge.

Which means you think it selective and not normal to charge Hunter with it too.

now you're not making sense, trying to muddle the issue because I proved you wrong. number 84 in the liberal playbook.
 
It's now being used against the WSE meth heads. If Hunter has to go to jail for a gun charge so We, the People, can lock up hundreds of drug addict White Supremacist Extremists, it's a good trade. LOL

From the link: "The federal gun charge, which makes it unlawful for a drug addict to possess a weapon, is a rarely used statute that is facing legal challenges and has recently been used as a catch-all charge against white supremacists."

6m7uni.jpg

There is no connection there. If Hunter does not go to jail, that does not mean it cannot be used as a tool against terrible criminals. Hunter is a single case.
 
There is no connection there. If Hunter does not go to jail, that does not mean it cannot be used as a tool against terrible criminals. Hunter is a single case.

Good thing I'm not a lawyer or a judge because I'd favor it. LOL
 
now you're not making sense, trying to muddle the issue because I proved you wrong. number 84 in the liberal playbook.

No.

You acknowledge it is a use of a 'selective prosecution' to charge white supremist with it.

That means you know it is not 'normally' charged and it is 'selective' to do so.


Sorry but that IS YOUR POSITION as stated.

That means you recognize it would be 'selective' and not 'normal' to charge Hunter too.
 
No.

You acknowledge it is a use of a 'selective prosecution' to charge white supremist with it.

That means you know it is not 'normally' charged and it is 'selective' to do so.


Sorry but that IS YOUR POSITION as stated.

That means you recognize it would be 'selective' and not 'normal' to charge Hunter too.
DumberthanMost isn't very smart.
 
Do you know the difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist?

We? You and your WSE terrorists? You've made it clear you'd murder anyone who got in your way. It goes back to the freedom fighter vs. terrorist thing, son.

Sez Mr. Tiny Penis that America hating alt leftie that thinks it is OK to shoot all supporters of Trump.
 
DumberthanMost isn't very smart.

I love how DumberthanMost caught himself and did not recognize it.

he was so eager to point out IT IS 'selective prosecution' to use, as a gotcha on white supremacist, that he did not even recognize that by pointing out IT IS 'selective prosecution' to use it to prosecute on, he made the point Hunter could not be prosecuted unless it was ALSO selective prosecution.

he checkmated himself and i do not think he even recognizes it yet, so don't be surprised if he still flails around saying he did not.
 
Back
Top