Supreme Court at war with the American people

B

BidenPresident

Verified User
Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. took issue with questions raised by the investigative journalism outlet ProPublica about his travel with a politically active billionaire, and on Tuesday evening, he outlined his defense in an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal.

Yet Alito was responding to a news story that ProPublica hadn’t yet published.

Alito’s Journal column, bluntly headlined “ProPublica Misleads Its Readers,” was an unusual public venture by a Supreme Court justice into the highly opinionated realm of a newspaper editorial page. And it drew criticism late Tuesday for effectively leaking elements of ProPublica’s still-in-progress journalism — with the assistance of the Journal’s editorial-page editors.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/06/21/alito-wsj-propublica-fishing-trip/
 
Justice Samuel Alito Took Luxury Fishing Vacation With GOP Billionaire Who Later Had

In early July 2008, Samuel Alito stood on a riverbank in a remote corner of Alaska. The Supreme Court justice was on vacation at a luxury fishing lodge that charged more than $1,000 a day, and after catching a king salmon nearly the size of his leg, Alito posed for a picture. To his left, a man stood beaming: Paul Singer, a hedge fund billionaire who has repeatedly asked the Supreme Court to rule in his favor in high-stakes business disputes.

Singer was more than a fellow angler. He flew Alito to Alaska on a private jet. If the justice chartered the plane himself, the cost could have exceeded $100,000 one way.

In the years that followed, Singer’s hedge fund came before the court at least 10 times in cases where his role was often covered by the legal press and mainstream media. In 2014, the court agreed to resolve a key issue in a decade-long battle between Singer’s hedge fund and the nation of Argentina. Alito did not recuse himself from the case and voted with the 7-1 majority in Singer’s favor. The hedge fund was ultimately paid $2.4 billion.

https://www.propublica.org/article/samuel-alito-luxury-fishing-trip-paul-singer-scotus-supreme-court
 
In an Unusual Step, Justice Alito Defends Luxury Trip With Billionaire

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. took the unusual step late Tuesday of responding to questions about his travel with a billionaire who frequently has cases before the Supreme Court hours before an article detailing their ties had even been published.

In an extraordinary salvo in a favored forum, Justice Alito defended himself in a pre-emptive article in the opinion pages of The Wall Street Journal before the news organization ProPublica posted its account of a luxury fishing trip in 2008.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/21/us/politics/justice-alito-luxury-travel-fishing-trip.html
 
Justice Alito wrote that he did not know of Mr. Singer’s connection to the cases before the court, including one in which the court issued a 7-to-1 decision in favor of one of Mr. Singer’s businesses, with Justice Alito in the majority.

But Mr. Singer’s connection to the case, Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, was widely reported. A Forbes article covering the decision bore the headline “Supreme Court Hands Billionaire Paul Singer a Victory Over Argentina.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/21/us/politics/justice-alito-luxury-travel-fishing-trip.html
 
BidenPresident said:
Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. took issue with questions raised by the investigative journalism outlet ProPublica about his travel with a politically active billionaire, and on Tuesday evening, he outlined his defense in an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal.

Yet Alito was responding to a news story that ProPublica hadn’t yet published.

Alito’s Journal column, bluntly headlined “ProPublica Misleads Its Readers,” was an unusual public venture by a Supreme Court justice into the highly opinionated realm of a newspaper editorial page. And it drew criticism late Tuesday for effectively leaking elements of ProPublica’s still-in-progress journalism — with the assistance of the Journal’s editorial-page editors.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/06/21/alito-wsj-propublica-fishing-trip/
Click to expand...

You get more desperate by the hour. Whet time does it end?
 
The title of this thread is wrong. The Supreme Court isn't at war with the American people, the radical Left is at war with the Supreme Court...
 
BidenPresident said:
Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. took issue with questions raised by the investigative journalism outlet ProPublica about his travel with a politically active billionaire, and on Tuesday evening, he outlined his defense in an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal.

Yet Alito was responding to a news story that ProPublica hadn’t yet published.

Alito’s Journal column, bluntly headlined “ProPublica Misleads Its Readers,” was an unusual public venture by a Supreme Court justice into the highly opinionated realm of a newspaper editorial page. And it drew criticism late Tuesday for effectively leaking elements of ProPublica’s still-in-progress journalism — with the assistance of the Journal’s editorial-page editors.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/06/21/alito-wsj-propublica-fishing-trip/
Click to expand...

So the DNC propaganda corps was engaged in it's usual yellow journalism (that's not offensive to the ChiCom troll like you, is it?) and Alito hit back, pointing out that they are slandering and libeling him.

Oh and stupid, ProPubicHair provided Alito with the story in advance of publication.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
So the DNC propaganda corps was engaged in it's usual yellow journalism (that's not offensive to the ChiCom troll like you, is it?) and Alito hit back, pointing out that they are slandering and libeling him.

Oh and stupid, ProPubicHair provided Alito with the story in advance of publication.
Click to expand...

That one is a special kind of loopy
 
BidenPresident said:
Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. took issue with questions raised by the investigative journalism outlet ProPublica about his travel with a politically active billionaire, and on Tuesday evening, he outlined his defense in an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal.

Yet Alito was responding to a news story that ProPublica hadn’t yet published.

Alito’s Journal column, bluntly headlined “ProPublica Misleads Its Readers,” was an unusual public venture by a Supreme Court justice into the highly opinionated realm of a newspaper editorial page. And it drew criticism late Tuesday for effectively leaking elements of ProPublica’s still-in-progress journalism — with the assistance of the Journal’s editorial-page editors.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/06/21/alito-wsj-propublica-fishing-trip/
Click to expand...

You really are too dumb and ignorant to comprehend how offensively stupid and false this article is.

The left is all on destroying what will be left of America after Biden's failed Presidency. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top