What is woke about the lil mermaid?

TOP said:
Wow that's Super harsh...wonder why she was forbidden?
Click to expand...

She said everything Disney is banned at her house cuz they “woke”. They used to be Disney crazy.

I think it’s like boycotting BudLight.
 
Jarod said:
She said everything Disney is banned at her house cuz they “woke”. They used to be Disney crazy.

I think it’s like boycotting BudLight.
Click to expand...
Bummer...that's worse than I imagined... next time you talk to her get a list of those movies... and I bet she's not allowed to go to Target..
 
TOP said:
Bummer...that's worse than I imagined... next time you talk to her get a list of those movies... and I bet she's not allowed to go to Target..
Click to expand...

She just told me there is another kid, 9 year old, told her today he isn’t allowed to see it.
 
Jarod said:
She just told me there is another kid, 9 year old, told her today he isn’t allowed to see it.
Click to expand...
In order for 100 IQ to be the average, there has to be an equal number of people dumber than 100 as there are over 100. Looks like she found two families where were helping fill out the backside of the curve....and Trump's "poorly educated".
 
Doc Dutch said:
Wow, Nomad. You said you were in fifth grade, I said I was a year ahead, but you think that's second grade? Are you okay?
Click to expand...

I said I was in the fifth grade when MLK was killed. You didn't specify that's what you were referring to when you said "I was a year ahead of you but recognized the issues at work."

How was I to know you were referring to the MLK assassination? I thought you meant in general.

Be more specific if you expect to be understood.

Doc Dutch said:
Like you, it's exaggerated to some extent, righteously true in other ways. There's still problems, mostly in Big Blue Cities (BBCs) such as gang violence...the #1 killer of black males 15-34 and causing a spike in US "gun violence". Why you deny the problems exist and claim they are only squeaking from the negroes is interesting, but I disagree.
Click to expand...

WTF are you on about now?

How is the problem of black males 15-34 killing each other over gang disputes a product of racism, discrimination or anything else the rest of society has done?

When or where did I deny there was a gun violence problem amongst blacks? That is my entire point. They're killing each other while ignoring it but every time a white on black killing occurs they start marching and protesting.

Give me a break!!!
 
Nomad said:
I said I was in the fifth grade when MLK was killed. You didn't specify that's what you were referring to when you said "I was a year ahead of you but recognized the issues at work."

How was I to know you were referring to the MLK assassination? I thought you meant in general.

Be more specific if you expect to be understood.



WTF are you on about now?

How is the problem of black males 15-34 killing each other over gang disputes a product of racism, discrimination or anything else the rest of society has done?

When or where did I deny there was a gun violence problem amongst blacks? That is my entire point. They're killing each other while ignoring it but every time a white on black killing occurs they start marching and protesting.

Give me a break!!!
Click to expand...
^^^
Typical racist; can't follow the conversation so he blames me. LOL
 
Doc Dutch said:
^^^
Typical racist; can't follow the conversation so he blames me. LOL
Click to expand...

You're a fucking idiot.

Leg humper.

13-dogs-who-really-love-hump-day-foot-not-in-mouth.gif
 
Nomad said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
What made you think (if you're capable of such) that mocking my writing style in a previous paragraph and substituting your regurgitation of your previous bigoted bilge will give it some gravitas?

Hint: it doesn't.

All you've done is waste time and effort to solidify the nonsense that I've addressed and dismantled in posts #1221 and #1237 . The recurring theme of your screed is you don't care what anyone else says ... you're personal interpretation/revision or whatever you call it is all that matters...valid, documented historical facts be damned.

Again, a hint: it doesn't

But thanks for proving my point to the reading audience (twice now). An added bonus is watching you make a fool of yourself attempting to be "clever" and intellectual. Truly, a good laugh for all.

Now, run-a-long and tell the joker you see in the mirror of your "triumph". I'm sure they and the resident MAGA mooks here will have similar praise. So much more to pity.

Oh, and as to the OP subject directly, you might want to check my posts #13 and #656. Catch ya later.
Click to expand...



You've dismantled nothing, woke phony.

All you did was copy/paste some contrived, rambling bullshit definition that has nothing to do with the reality of American society in 2023. Then you bloviated about facts of which you provided none and hurled some snarky comments.

As usual, you did a lot of typing to basically say nothing.

If you don't like my take on the word woke, fine. Ignore it.

If it hurts your feelings and makes you feel all poopy and sad, go crawl in your safe space and suck your thumb.

Nitwit.
Click to expand...


"woke phony"

:rolleyes: Typical MAGA bluff and bluster. You've already done that dance, bunky. It was seen, reviewed, rated and dumped in the trash with all the rest of your blather. But if you feel good seeing your guff in print, have fun regurgitating it ad nausea. The rational, objective reader can see your folly in the chronology of the posts (yeah, the phrase you can't BS past). You're done. Now, have the last predictable word and :bdh: ;)
 
Taichiliberal said:
"woke phony"

:rolleyes: Typical MAGA bluff and bluster. You've already done that dance, bunky. It was seen, reviewed, rated and dumped in the trash with all the rest of your blather. But if you feel good seeing your guff in print, have fun regurgitating it ad nausea. The rational, objective reader can see your folly in the chronology of the posts (yeah, the phrase you can't BS past). You're done. Now, have the last predictable word and :bdh: ;)
Click to expand...

I find it very revealing about what kind of people you and a handful of the other proggie, extreme left, woke Nazi drama queens around here are, simply by the way you come unglued over other people's opinions.

This all started after I had the temerity to suggest that maybe Disney was bowing to woke social pressure when they cast the little brown actress as a mermaid. That was all I said. Judging by the reaction out of the woke Nazis like yourself and a few others, you'd have thought I was advocating forced castration and genital mutilation for all alphabet fairies and shipping black people back to Africa.

Which is truly ironic when you consider that it is YOU WOKE NAZIS who are advocating for castration and genital mutilation, not only for yourselves and at taxpayer expense no less, but for CHILDREN as well!!!!

You fucking people are SICK!!!!

At any rate, I don't have to defend my opinions to sobbing crybabies like you or your ilk. If you delicate little flowers can't deal with me not agreeing with your gay agenda or my laughing at you for being such pathetic, limp-wristed crybabies and fairies who can't figure out which gender you are or wish you were or whatever, feel free to go fist fuck yourselves until you feel better.

I don't give a flying rat's ass about you or what you think of me or my opinion.
 
Nomad said:
Oh, so then I can assume your husband or boyfriend is a black tranny?

Well, no wonder your precious little girly feelings are offended!!!! :(

What's it like to spend all day every day offended about one thing or another?

Is it fun? Does it make you feel good?

Does it make your black loverboy treat you better?
Click to expand...

No, you cannot assume such a thing. I have determined that you are an actual idiot.
 
Disney is after profits. Their decision to make a fictional character black was predicated on the idea that it would have drawn a larger audience and made more money. They were not pushing any agenda.
 
Nordberg said:
Disney is after profits. Their decision to make a fictional character black was predicated on the idea that it would have drawn a larger audience and made more money. They were not pushing any agenda.
Click to expand...

Of course. And in the end, they will be proven to have made the right decision, because this bashing of those who are not white straight males is just about at an end. Their fifteen minutes is up.
 
Nordberg said:
Disney is after profits. Their decision to make a fictional character black was predicated on the idea that it would have drawn a larger audience and made more money. They were not pushing any agenda.
Click to expand...

..except to maximize profits. Agreed.

The homophobic white supremacist neo-Nazis think that because Chik-fil-A CEO Dan Cathy politicized his business by being against gay marriage, that all CEO's have a political agenda. The fact these fucking morons don't understand that there's a difference between the son of the founder of a company saying something and a board of directors saying something.

The sane, intelligent and educated understand that the company of Chik-fil-A itself came out and refuted Cathy. Why? Because only fucking morons politicize their business.

7ntg2u.gif
 
Nordberg said:
Disney is after profits. Their decision to make a fictional character black was predicated on the idea that it would have drawn a larger audience and made more money. They were not pushing any agenda.
Click to expand...

It is often a sign of a lack of wisdom and insight on the part of some people, when they profess to know for certain, things they have no way of knowing for certain.

While it's entirely possible you could be right, given the definitive nature of your statement which has no way of being proven by you, you lack the standing to have made it in the way you did. As if you were a party to it or observed it firsthand.

Everything I've opined on this subject has been presented as an opinion based on my observations. Mainly of the recent cancel culture phenomenon, where corporations have publicly bowed to woke pressure to change the names of long established products. My expressed opinions were formed under the assumption that Disney is likely no different from companies like PepsiCo and Mars Inc, owners of the former brands Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben's respectively, which are now called Pearl Milling Company and Ben's Original after woke pressure forced the parent companies to change the original names.

I still believe that if nothing else, in Disney's making the decision to "go black", the pressure to appease woke public opinion was at least a significant factor.

It just seems to be the way things go nowadays.
 
Concart said:
Of course. And in the end, they will be proven to have made the right decision, because this bashing of those who are not white straight males is just about at an end. Their fifteen minutes is up.
Click to expand...

So, if they end up in the long run just barely breaking even, will they be proven to have made the right decision?
 
Nomad said:
It is often a sign of a lack of wisdom and insight on the part of some people, when they profess to know for certain, things they have no way of knowing for certain
Click to expand...

Such as the fact a corporation has a fiduciary responsibility to their investors? This isn't rocket science, Nomad. I'm not a business guy or a fucking lawyer, but any Freshman in college can figure this out:

https://www.oflaherty-law.com/learn-about-law/fiduciary-duties-of-corporate-officers-and-director
Who Has Fiduciary Duties in a Corporation?
Corporate officers and directors have fiduciary duties to their company and all of the people they represent. Directors are typically responsible for overseeing the company, attending board meetings, and promoting the best interests of the company. Corporate officers, including the President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer, manage the day-to-day operations of the company. All of the aforementioned executive positions have massive control over the corporation, and therefore take on fiduciary duties to lawfully declare their obligation of trust and fidelity to the corporation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top