“House passes resolution to overturn new federal gun regulation”

[archives]

“WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans passed a resolution that would repeal a Biden administration rule tightening federal regulations on stabilizing braces for firearms, an accessory that has been used in several mass shootings in the U.S. over the last decade.”

“Since taking effect earlier this month, the rule requires anyone who has a gun with an arm-stabilizing brace to register the weapon with the federal government and pay a fee, or remove the brace from their weapons.”

“Several lawsuits have been filed against the regulations by gun owners and state attorneys general. They say it violates Second Amendment protections by requiring millions of people to alter or register their weapons”

“The main sponsor for the measure, Clyde, is a member of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus and the owner of a gun store in his district in Georgia. His proposal to overturn the ATF rule first came to the House Judiciary Committee in late March for markup. But House Republicans postponed debate of the measure after a gunman used a weapon with a stabilizing brace to fatally shoot three children and three adults at an elementary school in Nashville, Tenn.”

https://apnews.com/article/gun-stab...-republicans-5a1ee268735c400022ed83c3926667ef

Even if the measure gets thru the Senate, Biden will veto it, and there is no chance either body of Congress would get a two thirds vote to override the veto

But it would be interesting to hear a member of the “well regulated militia” explain specifically how this measure violates the Second Amendment

 

[Yakuda]

“WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans passed a resolution that would repeal a Biden administration rule tightening federal regulations on stabilizing braces for firearms, an accessory that has been used in several mass shootings in the U.S. over the last decade.”

“Since taking effect earlier this month, the rule requires anyone who has a gun with an arm-stabilizing brace to register the weapon with the federal government and pay a fee, or remove the brace from their weapons.”

“Several lawsuits have been filed against the regulations by gun owners and state attorneys general. They say it violates Second Amendment protections by requiring millions of people to alter or register their weapons”

“The main sponsor for the measure, Clyde, is a member of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus and the owner of a gun store in his district in Georgia. His proposal to overturn the ATF rule first came to the House Judiciary Committee in late March for markup. But House Republicans postponed debate of the measure after a gunman used a weapon with a stabilizing brace to fatally shoot three children and three adults at an elementary school in Nashville, Tenn.”

https://apnews.com/article/gun-stab...-republicans-5a1ee268735c400022ed83c3926667ef

Even if the measure gets thru the Senate, Biden will veto it, and there is no chance either body of Congress would get a two thirds vote to override the veto

But it would be interesting to hear a member of the “well regulated militia” explain specifically how this measure violates the Second Amendment

So it can only be overturned if it violates the second amendment?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

“WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans passed a resolution that would repeal a Biden administration rule tightening federal regulations on stabilizing braces for firearms, an accessory that has been used in several mass shootings in the U.S. over the last decade.”

“Since taking effect earlier this month, the rule requires anyone who has a gun with an arm-stabilizing brace to register the weapon with the federal government and pay a fee, or remove the brace from their weapons.”

“Several lawsuits have been filed against the regulations by gun owners and state attorneys general. They say it violates Second Amendment protections by requiring millions of people to alter or register their weapons”

“The main sponsor for the measure, Clyde, is a member of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus and the owner of a gun store in his district in Georgia. His proposal to overturn the ATF rule first came to the House Judiciary Committee in late March for markup. But House Republicans postponed debate of the measure after a gunman used a weapon with a stabilizing brace to fatally shoot three children and three adults at an elementary school in Nashville, Tenn.”

https://apnews.com/article/gun-stab...-republicans-5a1ee268735c400022ed83c3926667ef

Even if the measure gets thru the Senate, Biden will veto it, and there is no chance either body of Congress would get a two thirds vote to override the veto

But it would be interesting to hear a member of the “well regulated militia” explain specifically how this measure violates the Second Amendment

a stabilizing brace is not a firearm, therefore does not fall under the ATFs or federal governments powers to regulate.

 

[Lionfish]

“WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans passed a resolution that would repeal a Biden administration rule tightening federal regulations on stabilizing braces for firearms, an accessory that has been used in several mass shootings in the U.S. over the last decade.”

“Since taking effect earlier this month, the rule requires anyone who has a gun with an arm-stabilizing brace to register the weapon with the federal government and pay a fee, or remove the brace from their weapons.”

“Several lawsuits have been filed against the regulations by gun owners and state attorneys general. They say it violates Second Amendment protections by requiring millions of people to alter or register their weapons”

“The main sponsor for the measure, Clyde, is a member of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus and the owner of a gun store in his district in Georgia. His proposal to overturn the ATF rule first came to the House Judiciary Committee in late March for markup. But House Republicans postponed debate of the measure after a gunman used a weapon with a stabilizing brace to fatally shoot three children and three adults at an elementary school in Nashville, Tenn.”

https://apnews.com/article/gun-stab...-republicans-5a1ee268735c400022ed83c3926667ef

Even if the measure gets thru the Senate, Biden will veto it, and there is no chance either body of Congress would get a two thirds vote to override the veto

But it would be interesting to hear a member of the “well regulated militia” explain specifically how this measure violates the Second Amendment

Poor anchovies, do you know what a stabilizing brace actually is and why was it developed in the first place?

 

[archives]

So it can only be overturned if it violates the second amendment?

Lets try it again for those seemingly incapable of processing, it would be interesting to hear a member of the “well regulated militia” explain specifically how this measure violates the Second Amendment as the House Republicans claim

 

[archives]

Poor anchovies, do you know what a stabilizing brace actually is and why was it developed in the first place?

No, nor do I care, and forget the disabled argument, it was covered in the regulation

What I do know, and America knows, it was employed in the mass shootings in Colorado, Ohio, and Tennessee resulting in close to twenty five deaths including children

 

[Yakuda]

Lets try it again for those seemingly incapable of processing, it would be interesting to hear a member of the “well regulated militia” explain specifically how this measure violates the Second Amendment as the House Republicans claim

Let's try again, I dont give a shit. They can overturn it simply because they dont fucking like it.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No, nor do I care, and forget the disabled argument, it was covered in the regulation

What I do know, and America knows, it was employed in the mass shootings in Colorado, Ohio, and Tennessee resulting in close to twenty five deaths including children

this is a good example of anti gun liberal stupidity. Raising the argument that guns should not be allowed in public unless you're 'highly trained' because innocent people would be harmed by random gunfire from untrained individuals, then do all you can to prevent people from being more accurate by regulating the stabilizing braces that provide more accuracy

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Let's try again, I dont give a shit. They can overturn it simply because they dont fucking like it.

or congress could decide to take back their constitutional power to make laws instead of leaving it up to an alphabet agency that has no constitutional power to make law

 

[Lionfish]

No, nor do I care, and forget the disabled argument, it was covered in the regulation

What I do know, and America knows, it was employed in the mass shootings in Colorado, Ohio, and Tennessee resulting in close to twenty five deaths including children

Poor anchovies,

Well, a stabilizing brace is used to help young kids with birth defects walk much easier. Now, feel better about Republicans.

 

[Tinkerpeach]

Republicans will just take it to the Supreme Court where they will overturn it

 

[NiftyNiblick]

Joe just doesn't want to accept that he presides over the government of a shooting gallery.
As long as there's an America, Americans will cap one another's asses.
It's one of the few things that we seem to do well.

Instead of trying to fix what's fixable,
we try to pretend America is something that it's not--a civilized nation
where people don't shoot each other for the hell of it.

What we've got now is exactly what the idiot founders wanted--
the love child of a dumpster fire and a shit show.

 

[archives]

this is a good example of anti gun liberal stupidity. Raising the argument that guns should not be allowed in public unless you're 'highly trained' because innocent people would be harmed by random gunfire from untrained individuals, then do all you can to prevent people from being more accurate by regulating the stabilizing braces that provide more accuracy

Ah, I think anyone would agree that “innocent people be harmed by random gunfire” from anyone is a problem, especially if it is innocent people killed by random gunfire

 

[archives]

Poor anchovies,

Well, a stabilizing brace is used to help young kids with birth defects walk much easier. Now, feel better about Republicans.

]

Yeah, the regulation applies to all braces of any kind used anywhere, too funny, and in this case we are not talking about leg braces for kids, duh, talking rather braces designed specifically to help shooters shoot easier

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Ah, I think anyone would agree that “innocent people be harmed by random gunfire” from anyone is a problem, especially if it is innocent people killed by random gunfire

and yet you rally against people trying to train and improve their ability to be accurate............essentially willfully ignoring my point in the post.........