I'll make sure those 17 recordings of Joe and Hunter are released

The legal definition says otherwise.

[FONT=&]Sex Trafficking[/FONT][FONT=&] — Individuals are compelled to engage in commercial sex through the use of force, fraud, or coercion. When a person under 18 years old is induced to perform a commercial sex act, it is a crime regardless of whether there is any force, fraud, or coercion.

[/FONT]
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/otip/about/what-human-trafficking


The Mann Act, passed in June 1910 and named after Illinois Congressman James R. Mann, invoked the Commerce Clause to felonize the use of interstate or foreign commerce to transport women for immoral purposes. The Act was aimed at prostitution, immorality, and human trafficking. Congress appointed a commission in 1907 to investigate into the problem of immigrant prostitutes. It was alleged that immigrant women were brought to America for sexual slavery and immigrant men lured American girls into prostitution (or “white slavery”). The committees believed that no girl would enter prostitution unless drugged or held captive. This led to public outrage which eventually resulted in the enactment of the Mann Act.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/man...t (also known,for any other immoral purpose.”

You can't fly hos around on the airlines. It is a felony.
 

Interesting article.

"...many critics note that the Act ended up criminalizing many kinds of consensual sexual activity and had racist undertones. The phrase “immoral purpose” was broadly used to prosecute unlawful premarital, extramarital, and interracial relationships following Caminetti v. United States (1917), where the United States Supreme Court held that “illicit fornication,” even when consensual, constituted an “immoral purpose.” It didn’t matter if the woman consented, the man would be liable irrespectively; furthermore, if the woman consented, she could be held as an accessory to the crime. While the Act was never repealed it was amended a few times, the most notable of which were in 1978 to address issues of child pornography and in 1986 to address the Act’s misuse against consensual sex by replacing the phrase “any other immoral purpose” with “any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.”
 
Interesting article.

[FONT=&]"...many critics note that the Act ended up criminalizing many kinds of consensual sexual activity and had racist undertones. The phrase “immoral purpose” was broadly used to prosecute unlawful premarital, extramarital, and interracial relationships following [/FONT]Caminetti v. United States (1917)[FONT=&], where the [/FONT]United States Supreme Court[FONT=&] held that “illicit fornication,” even when consensual, constituted an “immoral purpose.” It didn’t matter if the woman consented, the man would be liable irrespectively; furthermore, if the woman consented, she could be held as an [/FONT]accessory[FONT=&] to the crime. While the Act was never [/FONT]repealed[FONT=&] it was [/FONT]amended[FONT=&] a few times, the most notable of which were in 1978 to address issues of child pornography and in 1986 to address the Act’s misuse against consensual sex by replacing the phrase “any other immoral purpose” with “any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.”[/FONT]

STILL ILLEGAL.
 
So basically the trash they used as justification to illegally spy on the Trump campaign. Got it,...thanks.

The FBI was listening in on Russian agents and connections in America. What they found was the Russians were talking to people involved in Trump's campaign. Trump immediately claimed they were listening in on his campaign. But it was accidental.
 
The FBI was listening in on Russian agents and connections in America. What they found was the Russians were talking to people involved in Trump's campaign. Trump immediately claimed they were listening in on his campaign. But it was accidental.
Hillary bought the fake Russian dossier from real Russians
 
I want them released… But it seems it’s the Republicans who want to keep them secret so they can pretend there is something on them.
 
It sure SHOULD have. Isn't it interesting the FBI can't even indict him for illegally saying he wasn't using drugs when he bought a handgun.

Why would the FBI be involved in what essentially falls under the jurisdiction of local cops or the DEA?

Bottom line: Since Hunter was NOT an official member of the Obama or current administration, and NO CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT HAS PRESIDENT BIDEN BEING DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN ANY NEFARIOUS DEALINGS, the best that will come out of this is that Hunter was a little sleazy in trading in on Dad's name/position and doing illegal narcotics. As for the hookers, that's local vice cops to handle.

But the MAGA minions will beat this drum to death.....hoping to divert attention from the REAL & DOCUMENTED FEDERAL LAW BREAKING by their orange god.
 
I'll make sure those 17 recordings of Joe and Hunter are released: Republican Steve Scalise vows to 'press' to make Burisma exec's phone calls public - and says Americans are furious the Bidens have gotten away with 'web of corruption'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ss-make-Burisma-execs-phone-calls-public.html


17 audio recordings

All of Biden’s money laundering effort just went down the crapper.

joe-biden-head-shake.gif
 
I'll make sure those 17 recordings of Joe and Hunter are released: Republican Steve Scalise vows to 'press' to make Burisma exec's phone calls public - and says Americans are furious the Bidens have gotten away with 'web of corruption'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ss-make-Burisma-execs-phone-calls-public.html


17 audio recordings

All of Biden’s money laundering effort just went down the crapper.
THE ONLY THINGS THAT MATTER AND THE ONLY RESPONSE FOR THIS TYPE OF BULLSHIT< IS TO SIMPLIFY IT ALL BY SAYING THE RIGHTS GOD AND LEADER SCUM BAG WILL BE GOING TO JAIL FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE> SO JUST IGNORE THIS CRAP.
 
Back
Top