Anybody see Rachael Maddow get owned last night

Topper people do care.

They were talking about Killing gay people you asswink.

"First they came for the homosexuals" ring a bell?
 
evince said:
Topper people do care.

They were talking about Killing gay people you asswink.

"First they came for the homosexuals" ring a bell?
Click to expand...

I care too, just not priority number 1 like it is for her. It's not number 20 for me or the country. Cali rejected it, Main and New York rejected it. We waited for 8 years to get power and were going to piss it away on a trip to mars.
800,000 mostly minorities get jailed for pot each year, how much would it help Obama and the economy if they were out and paying taxes.

We have dozens of more important priorites and she's polluting the airwave like the sophmoric teenager from Air America that she never grew out of.
A professional should be able to put aside their personal views.
That and she needs a new haircut and too pluck that eyebrow.
 
Topspin said:
I care too, just not priority number 1 like it is for her. It's not number 20 for me or the country. Cali rejected it, Main and New York rejected it. We waited for 8 years to get power and were going to piss it away on a trip to mars.
800,000 mostly minorities get jailed for pot each year, how much would it help Obama and the economy if they were out and paying taxes.

We have dozens of more important priorites and she's polluting the airwave like the sophmoric teenager from Air America that she never grew out of.
A professional should be able to put aside their personal views.
That and she needs a new haircut and too pluck that eyebrow.
Click to expand...
If you had the same platform, all we'd ever hear about is dope.
 
hey they do need to send these guys a load of spliffs so they can chill before they make these evil laws.

I bet they would be chilling with the gays instead of killing them.

A perfect ganga world.
 
Damocles said:
If you had the same platform, all we'd ever hear about is dope.
Click to expand...

1. It's 1,000 times greater an issue
2. Did I say I was a professional journalist,

Of course that's all you'd hear about capt obvious, we'll I'd toss in a little Sean Alexander "How to pimp and make money".

But yeah it be dope, differnt strain reviews etc.
my next career.
 
evince said:
I love the part where she quotes his book and he denys what she quoted was in the book and she gives him the page number and points to it in the book, then he says he will remove that on next printing.

He is the one who got owned
Click to expand...

That's not what happened. She read the passage and he said that he already planned to take it out in edition 3, not because it was wrong, but presumably because it didn't help his case.
 
Damocles said:
"because people are using it for things we didn't intend them to be used for."

It sounds like one person in the room took responsibility for their choices.
Click to expand...
Only because he was caught red handed using fake science in his book.
 
Southern Man said:
That's not what happened. She read the passage and he said that he already planned to take it out in edition 3, not because it was wrong, but presumably because it didn't help his case.
Click to expand...

Now I consider myself a pretty objective viewer of such things and that's not what I saw. I saw him amazed that it was in there and saying something like, "if that's what it says then it's coming out of the next edition." I could be wrong and will now have to go back and check out the confounded thing for myself. Another few minutes wasted.
 
leaningright said:
Now I consider myself a pretty objective viewer of such things and that's not what I saw. I saw him amazed that it was in there and saying something like, "if that's what it says then it's coming out of the next edition." I could be wrong and will now have to go back and check out the confounded thing for myself. Another few minutes wasted.
Click to expand...
Again I didn't see the 2nd part. What I saw was in the first. I didn't see him amazed at all but expecting it, because the stuff is pretty inflammatory even though it is true. She never claimed it wasn't true. She only wanted the "gotcha" and didn't give him time to explain but it was obvious to me that the stuff was true but not necessary to make his case.

She also never attempted to deny the point of his book, that queers can be cured if they want to be cured.
 
Frist he said it did not say that and then when she showed him the page and that she was reading directly from a copy of the BOOK ( she had it opened and read the passage right from it on camera). Then he said it was coming out in the next printing.

He was obviously lying about it not being in the book, its his fucking book.
 
Southern Man said:
Again I didn't see the 2nd part. What I saw was in the first. I didn't see him amazed at all but expecting it, because the stuff is pretty inflammatory even though it is true. She never claimed it wasn't true. She only wanted the "gotcha" and didn't give him time to explain but it was obvious to me that the stuff was true but not necessary to make his case.

She also never attempted to deny the point of his book, that queers can be cured if they want to be cured.
Click to expand...

IT IS NOT TRUE!

it is long discredited bullshit science
 
evince said:
Frist he said it did not say that and then when she showed him the page and that she was reading directly from a copy of the BOOK ( she had it opened and read the passage right from it on camera). Then he said it was coming out in the next printing.

He was obviously lying about it not being in the book, its his fucking book.
Click to expand...

No it did not say what she claimed it said before she stared reading, that it advocated killing queers or some shit like that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top