You wanted HRC locked up over top secret info on her server...

Republiclowns, called for years to have Hillary and Obama and his Admin to be locked up. They did countless investigations towards that end.

Republiclowns have been running non stop investigations into Biden and his Admin to smear them and in the hopes of finding crimes to prosecute.

The difference being, republiclowns are unable to establish of find actual criminality and they fail in court with their own appointees when they try.


So this cry that there 'are two standards' is garbage because if the Republiclowns believed Trump should not be prosecuted even if guilty then they would not investigate Biden or Obama, ever, as they would not be prosecuting even if guilty. Which flies in the face of Durham searching and searching and prosecuting the only people he had hoped he could get a win versus even when innocent.

If the Dems agreed that Trump as an ex POTUS should have all charges dropped today as it was wrong to prosecute an ex POTUS and the very next day Biden was found to have done a crime, the exact same Republiclowns would be crying for prosecution and saying 'no one is above the law', while saying they are the party of law and order.
 
Nordberg said:
Obvious crimes? Did you really type that? Biden's family has not been charged with any crimes. Zero. Trump is finishing off a lifetime crime spree. If the Bidens family did something illegal, they will face justice and you will applaud it. But you do not want Trump to face justice because you are a Trump suckup and are flat-out dishonest.
Can you guess what the judge would say if Trump offered the what about Hillary deflection?
Click to expand...

e6dcb3cb101c6766.jpg
 
ptif219 said:
You mean Obama and the Democrats protected her and she spewed lies and avoided answering questions
Click to expand...

Read then FBI Director James Comey's own words:

In an otherwise harshly critical assessment in which he condemned Clinton’s email practices as “extremely careless,” then-FBI Director James Comey announced that investigators had found no clear evidence that Clinton or her aides had intended to break laws governing classified information.

As a result, he said, “no reasonable prosecutor” would move forward with a case. The relevant Espionage Act cases brought by the Justice Department over the past century, Comey said, all involved factors including efforts to obstruct justice, willful mishandling of classified documents and indications of disloyalty to the U.S. None of those factors existed in the Clinton investigation, he said.

And he had access to MUCH MORE evidence than you.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Not enough evidence to convict.

They exaggerated but Hillary did break the law. She didn't even get a wrist slap from the Obama administration for obvious reasons.
Click to expand...



Dutch


Half the government was doing the same thing

Tech was changing at a whirlwind pace

Existing laws were paltry to fit the time


Comey said NO SANE PERSON WOULD HAVE BROUGHT CHARGES ON THE FACTS AT HAND


It is a confirmed lie to call her a criminal


Did Bush and Cheney go to prison for lying us to war?


Did Reagan go to prison for being a private citizen who negotiated with Iran to get them to keep holding the hostages so he could beat Carter?


Those are real crimes


Hilary didn’t do a very crime


You were brainwashed
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Read then FBI Director James Comey's own words:

In an otherwise harshly critical assessment in which he condemned Clinton’s email practices as “extremely careless,” then-FBI Director James Comey announced that investigators had found no clear evidence that Clinton or her aides had intended to break laws governing classified information.

As a result, he said, “no reasonable prosecutor” would move forward with a case. The relevant Espionage Act cases brought by the Justice Department over the past century, Comey said, all involved factors including efforts to obstruct justice, willful mishandling of classified documents and indications of disloyalty to the U.S. None of those factors existed in the Clinton investigation, he said.

And he had access to MUCH MORE evidence than you.
Click to expand...

Bares repeating
 
BTW


ITs standard prosecutor morals to not smear a person when you announce no charges


Look at his shitty treatment for someone he’s clearing in that document
 
QP! said:
Republiclowns, called for years to have Hillary and Obama and his Admin to be locked up. They did countless investigations towards that end.

Republiclowns have been running non stop investigations into Biden and his Admin to smear them and in the hopes of finding crimes to prosecute.

The difference being, republiclowns are unable to establish of find actual criminality and they fail in court with their own appointees when they try.


So this cry that there 'are two standards' is garbage because if the Republiclowns believed Trump should not be prosecuted even if guilty then they would not investigate Biden or Obama, ever, as they would not be prosecuting even if guilty. Which flies in the face of Durham searching and searching and prosecuting the only people he had hoped he could get a win versus even when innocent.

If the Dems agreed that Trump as an ex POTUS should have all charges dropped today as it was wrong to prosecute an ex POTUS and the very next day Biden was found to have done a crime, the exact same Republiclowns would be crying for prosecution and saying 'no one is above the law', while saying they are the party of law and order.
Click to expand...




Remember when a dem was locked up for trying to remove ONE document under clinton
 
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/wbna16304450


President Clinton’s national security adviser removed classified documents from the National Archives, hid them under a construction trailer and later tried to find the trash collector to retrieve them, the agency’s internal watchdog said Wednesday.

The report was issued more than a year after Sandy Berger pleaded guilty and received a criminal sentence for removing the documents.




Democrats were in control and fried him for it
 
evince said:
Dutch

Half the government was doing the same thing

Tech was changing at a whirlwind pace

Existing laws were paltry to fit the time


Comey said NO SANE PERSON WOULD HAVE BROUGHT CHARGES ON THE FACTS AT HAND


It is a confirmed lie to call her a criminal


Did Bush and Cheney go to prison for lying us to war?


Did Reagan go to prison for being a private citizen who negotiated with Iran to get them to keep holding the hostages so he could beat Carter?


Those are real crimes


Hilary didn’t do a very crime


You were brainwashed
Click to expand...

The Republicans keep saying two wrongs make a right. I disagree with that philosophy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top