Why oh why did you lie?????

Cancel 2016.2

Cancel 2016.2

The Almighty
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...s-the-most-influential-tree-in-the-world.html

What could possibly be the reason Saint Gore would have used false data to perpetuate the myth of man made global warming?

Could it be that the idiot simply doesn't have a clue when it comes to Science and so he simply spouted off talking points from the likes of Jones, Mann and Brifa? Could it be that the idiot was played like a fiddle? Using additional morons from Hollywood to tout and promote that awful horrific lie filled piece of trash he called a documentary?

We know why Mann and Company lied.... it meant more money for them.

Strange Saint Al hasn't come around to explain what his take is on all the false data he has been using.

Maybe the Messiah can get him to come clean.... but wait... no... the One is also doing his best to ignore the evidence mounting against the fear mongering liars of AGW 'fame'
 
Superfreak said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...s-the-most-influential-tree-in-the-world.html

What could possibly be the reason Saint Gore would have used false data to perpetuate the myth of man made global warming?

Could it be that the idiot simply doesn't have a clue when it comes to Science and so he simply spouted off talking points from the likes of Jones, Mann and Brifa? Could it be that the idiot was played like a fiddle? Using additional morons from Hollywood to tout and promote that awful horrific lie filled piece of trash he called a documentary?

We know why Mann and Company lied.... it meant more money for them.

Strange Saint Al hasn't come around to explain what his take is on all the false data he has been using.

Maybe the Messiah can get him to come clean.... but wait... no... the One is also doing his best to ignore the evidence mounting against the fear mongering liars of AGW 'fame'
Click to expand...
It's hard to give up on the whole Faith thing once it sets in, I think it is the inborn need to never admit a contradiction of belief to reality that even scientists seem hard pressed to overcome.
 
Damocles said:
It's hard to give up on the whole Faith thing once it sets in, I think it is the inborn need to never admit a contradiction of belief to reality that even scientists seem hard pressed to overcome.
Click to expand...

Agreed.... so many of these scientists used the data of Mann and company as the foundation of their work. Now their own houses just had the foundation ripped from under them and they are shaking in their homes huddled in corners saying over and over to themselves 'it will hold up, it will hold up, it will hold up'...

either that or they are sitting their weeping like a Tebow.
 
[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker[/ame]


Views on science
Via his long-running column in the UK's Sunday Telegraph, Booker has claimed that man-made global warming was "disproved" in 2008[1], that white asbestos is "chemically identical to talcum powder" and poses a "non-existent risk" to human health[2], that "scientific evidence to support [the] belief that inhaling other people's smoke causes cancer simply does not exist"[3] and that there is "no proof that BSE causes CJD in humans"[4]. He has also defended the theory of Intelligent Design, maintaining that Darwinians "rest their case on nothing more than blind faith and unexamined a priori assumptions".
 
im starting to grow a little suspect to the validity of this climate gate? Has the allegations been proven? The timing of it seems very convenient.. and something doesn't seem right. Just a gut instinct.
 
Chapdog said:
im starting to grow a little suspect to the validity of this climate gate? Has the allegations been proven? The timing of it seems very convenient.. and something doesn't seem right. Just a gut instinct.
Click to expand...

Which allegations?

1) The emails are real... which has been admitted.

2) the timing was of course planned to bring the maximum amount of attention at a time that it mattered most.
 
Superfreak said:
Which allegations?

1) The emails are real... which has been admitted.

2) the timing was of course planned to bring the maximum amount of attention at a time that it mattered most.
Click to expand...

Im not ready to totally write off man made global warming. How can chemical runoff into the ocean or clear cutting rain forest not effect it? What about when your in a city with lots of smog its noticeably warmer then on smog free days.

Just seems like some are basically ready to write off any sort of man made global warming as false based on this.
 
Chapdog said:
Im not ready to totally write off man made global warming. How can chemical runoff into the ocean or clear cutting rain forest not effect it? What about when your in a city with lots of smog its noticeably warmer then on smog free days.

Just seems like some are basically ready to write off any sort of man made global warming as false based on this.
Click to expand...

I have no doubt that we can affect the environment with our pollution and with tearing down the rain forest etc...

Those are the things we should be focusing our time and resources to resolve.

By reducing the pollution of our land, air and water, we will not only be cleaning up the environment, but we will also be improving our over all health.

By reducing the use of fossil fuels, we are again not only helping the environment, but we are also improving our national security and our economy.

That said... all the time and money and intellectual capacity that has been wasted on this 'global warming' farce is a tragedy. They have NOTHING to back their claims that man is causing the earth to warm. Are we polluting it... absolutely. But their fear mongering is doing nothing to resolve that issue. To the contrary, their fear mongering is hurting the cause.
 
there are many whores like the guy who wrote this article who would sell their words and souls for the right amount of money
 
evince said:
there are many whores like the guy who wrote this article who would sell their words and souls for the right amount of money
Click to expand...

There are many whores that would falsify data, destroy the original data, suppress opposition and then try to scare the world into believing something that will help FUND THEM for decades to come. They have quite obviously sold their souls and defrauded tax payers.
 
Where is the proof of altered data?

There is only the stolen enmails and assholes like this guy telling you what they decide they mean.

There is NO evidence of altered data.
 
evince said:
Where is the proof of altered data?

There is only the stolen enmails and assholes like this guy telling you what they decide they mean.

There is NO evidence of altered data.
Click to expand...

You are such a hack...

They have already stated that they destroyed parts of the original data back in the 1980's due to storage capacity issues. The data they have currently has been 'value added' which translates into it has been massaged.

The hockey stick data has been debunked TWICE. Yet people like you still believe it is real, because that is the ONLY way AGW looks real.

The fact is... the Medieval period was warmer than it is today. The mini-ice age did occur. Over the past century the earth HAS warmed coming out of the mini-ice age.

Pollution IS a problem. It is what we need to be addressing. Instead we are wasting our time trying to prove that it is MAN that is altering NATURE. It is a waste of time and resources to do so.
 
Superfreak said:
You are such a hack...

They have already stated that they destroyed parts of the original data back in the 1980's due to storage capacity issues. The data they have currently has been 'value added' which translates into it has been massaged.

The hockey stick data has been debunked TWICE. Yet people like you still believe it is real, because that is the ONLY way AGW looks real.

The fact is... the Medieval period was warmer than it is today. The mini-ice age did occur. Over the past century the earth HAS warmed coming out of the mini-ice age.

Pollution IS a problem. It is what we need to be addressing. Instead we are wasting our time trying to prove that it is MAN that is altering NATURE. It is a waste of time and resources to do so.
Click to expand...

Desh correctly says follow the money but in her world view the scientists motives are pure and it's anyone who challenges or question's the scientists whose motives are corrupted my money.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top