Swalwell's claim of 'collusion' between Trump, Russia contradicted by Durham report

^^^Typical deranged Democrat :laugh:^^^

There is simply no instance, NONE, where that type of report, along with all the known Trump Admin contacts with Russians they are lying about and denying, SHOULD NOT AND WOULD NOT trigger an investigations.

To not investigate should be instant reason to fire everyone in the FBI.
 
fb_img_1684810131108-jpg.1287402

Except it was not.





UK intelligence gave US key tipoff about Russian hacking, report says


...British intelligence reportedly provided a vital tipoff to the US in 2015 about the extent of Russian hacking on the presidential election.

vladimir putin tvs
US intelligence report: Vladimir Putin 'ordered' operation to get Trump elected
Read more
The report on the UK’s involvement came after US intelligence agencies published an unclassified version of their finding that Vladimir Putin ordered a multi-pronged operation to interfere in the election in favour of Donald Trump.

The New York Times, citing “two people familiar with the conclusions” of the report, said British intelligence was “among the first” to raise the alarm in autumn 2015 that Moscow had hacked the computer servers of the Democratic National Committee....

...Over the course the campaign, British officials were as alarmed as their US counterparts over the extent of contacts between Trump advisers and Moscow and by Trump’s consistently pro-Russian stance on a range of foreign policy issues....

...Allegations about the depth and nature of contacts between the Trump camp and Moscow have been passed to the FBI but it is unclear whether they are the subject of a full investigation....

...“We assess Russian president Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election,” the joint finding by the CIA, FBI and NSA said.

“Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.”...

..In 2015, Flynn flew to Moscow at RT’s expense to attend a dinner marking RT’s 10th anniversary. He was seated at the same table as Putin and has been a regular guest on RT shows....
 
Except it was not.





UK intelligence gave US key tipoff about Russian hacking, report says


...British intelligence reportedly provided a vital tipoff to the US in 2015 about the extent of Russian hacking on the presidential election.

vladimir putin tvs
US intelligence report: Vladimir Putin 'ordered' operation to get Trump elected
Read more
The report on the UK’s involvement came after US intelligence agencies published an unclassified version of their finding that Vladimir Putin ordered a multi-pronged operation to interfere in the election in favour of Donald Trump.

The New York Times, citing “two people familiar with the conclusions” of the report, said British intelligence was “among the first” to raise the alarm in autumn 2015 that Moscow had hacked the computer servers of the Democratic National Committee....

...Over the course the campaign, British officials were as alarmed as their US counterparts over the extent of contacts between Trump advisers and Moscow and by Trump’s consistently pro-Russian stance on a range of foreign policy issues....

...Allegations about the depth and nature of contacts between the Trump camp and Moscow have been passed to the FBI but it is unclear whether they are the subject of a full investigation....

...“We assess Russian president Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election,” the joint finding by the CIA, FBI and NSA said.

“Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments.”...

..In 2015, Flynn flew to Moscow at RT’s expense to attend a dinner marking RT’s 10th anniversary. He was seated at the same table as Putin and has been a regular guest on RT shows....

Did you also believe the Pee Pee tape existed?
 
Did you also believe the Pee Pee tape existed?

The pee tape is getting renewed now. it explains Trump sucking up to Putin.
Flynn was nailed for hiding the extent of his connections with Russia and lying to the FBI. He pleaded guilty 3 times.
Manafort provided Russian hackers with polling data and targeting.
Stone was a go-between for Russian hackers and Trump's people.
Russia -Putin made Trump president.
There were more involved with Russian hackers. Trump asked Russian hackers to look up dirt on Hillary. He did so in a speech.
 
Did you also believe the Pee Pee tape existed?

You don't believe the UK made that report to FBI?

You don't believe Trump and associated had those multiple contacts with Russians they were denying and lying about?


I have not yet seen those denials in TrumpDerp land. I see them say 'that does not prove collusion' but even Trump, DonJr, and Manafort, etc admit the contacts and the UK report is now public via multiple investigations.


Those things all DID happen and there is no instance, NONE where those types of things happening would not just justify but REQUIRE the FB to open an investigation.
 
The pee tape is getting renewed now. it explains Trump sucking up to Putin.
Flynn was nailed for hiding the extent of his connections with Russia and lying to the FBI. He pleaded guilty 3 times.
Manafort provided Russian hackers with polling data and targeting.
Stone was a go-between for Russian hackers and Trump's people.
Russia -Putin made Trump president.
There were more involved with Russian hackers. Trump asked Russian hackers to look up dirt on Hillary. He did so in a speech.

Also...


11donaldtrump-superJumbo.png


dontrumpjrmail-kOyB--621x414@LiveMint.JPG


Trump_Russian_Cash.jpg


_96903168_trump_natalia_zoom.jpg
 
As opposed to Swalwell's collusion with a Chinese spy...

In bed...

That was real.

Agreed. And it was fully investigated as it should be and no one denies it.

See the difference. Trump Derps say Trumps should not have been investigated and they still deny the facts that it happened.


The results of both investigations are the results. that is not the issue. The issue is one side (trumpers) deny everything about it and the other does not.
 
As opposed to Swalwell's collusion with a Chinese spy...

In bed...

That was real.

House Ethics Committee closes Swalwell investigation with no further action

“It’s time to move on,” he said. “The bipartisan House Ethics Committee had this case for over two years. They had the power of subpoena. They received answers from me in response to requests for information. Today, they are closing this matter and did not make a finding of any wrongdoing.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/23/swalwell-ethics-investigation-closed/

So, nothing.
 
Swalwell's claim of 'collusion' between Trump, Russia contradicted by Durham report

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., consistently claimed there was strong evidence of collusion between Russia and former President Donald Trump, but those statements were contradicted by the release of Special Counsel John Durham's report on the Trump investigation.

"In our investigation, we saw strong evidence of collusion – the Republicans now are choosing to bury it," Swalwell told CNN in March 2018, eventually clarifying that he believed there is "clear collusion."

Durham's report on his investigation, released this month, showed otherwise, as it concluded intelligence agencies had no "actual evidence of collusion" to justify their launch of the Trump-Russia investigation. These findings added to Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report in 2019 that concluded there was no evidence the Trump campaign engaged in a criminal plot to collude with the Russians to influence the 2016 election.

Swalwell, though, continued to push the collusion narrative in his media appearances from 2018 to 2019.........


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/swalwells-claim-collusion-trump-russia-contradicted-durham-report

===========================

Swalwell the Chinese spy colluder still has not produced a shred of credible evidence Trump colluded. Around 50 million dollars has been spent by two investigations and no collusion by Trump was ever found. The guy who loved spies lied to the public just like libratards on this site have lied about Trump colluding.

The Durham Report is nothing but partisan bullshit just like everything else the lying bullshit political right does.
 
As opposed to Swalwell's collusion with a Chinese spy...

In bed...

That was real.

Dear Representative Swalwell,

As you are aware, on April 9, 2021, the Committee on Ethics (Committee) informed you
that it had determined to investigate allegations raised in the complaint that you may have violated
House Rules, laws, or other standards of conduct in connection with your interactions with Ms.
Christine Fang. The Committee will take no further action in this matter.

https://swalwell.house.gov/sites/swalwell.house.gov/files/COE to swalwell.pdf
 
Agreed. And it was fully investigated as it should be and no one denies it.

See the difference. Trump Derps say Trumps should not have been investigated and they still deny the facts that it happened.

The results of both investigations are the results. that is not the issue. The issue is one side (trumpers) deny everything about it and the other does not.

Yet, Swalwell, a Democrat got no repercussions from his actions, just like the 35 Democrats with Debbie Wassermann-Schultz leading the pack, didn't for using unvetted Pakistani nationals as their IT computer "experts" who had no background to put on a resume in computer expertise. They too had access to all sorts of classified information, not to mention the private dealings of Congress in general. Yet, nothing was done to any of them, including even a cursory investigation into what sort of intelligence failure and breach that caused. In both cases, the "investigation" was more of a cover up and putting up a barrier to avoid any of it seeing the light of day.

You are perfectly happy with a double standard pillorying Trump while ignoring the far grosser and obvious excesses and illegalities the Democrats do. I want them ALL investigated and tossed out of office if they fucked up. But of course, with roughly a third of Democrats in office falling into that category it would be catastrophic for you as the Democrats would no longer have any power in Dirty City.
 
House Ethics Committee closes Swalwell investigation with no further action

“It’s time to move on,” he said. “The bipartisan House Ethics Committee had this case for over two years. They had the power of subpoena. They received answers from me in response to requests for information. Today, they are closing this matter and did not make a finding of any wrongdoing.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/23/swalwell-ethics-investigation-closed/

So, nothing.

Like I said, it wasn't an investigation, but a cover up. Democrats protect their own.
 
Dear Representative Swalwell,

As you are aware, on April 9, 2021, the Committee on Ethics (Committee) informed you
that it had determined to investigate allegations raised in the complaint that you may have violated
House Rules, laws, or other standards of conduct in connection with your interactions with Ms.
Christine Fang. The Committee will take no further action in this matter.

https://swalwell.house.gov/sites/swalwell.house.gov/files/COE to swalwell.pdf

And with that, the cover up was complete...
 
You don't believe the UK made that report to FBI?

You don't believe Trump and associated had those multiple contacts with Russians they were denying and lying about?


I have not yet seen those denials in TrumpDerp land. I see them say 'that does not prove collusion' but even Trump, DonJr, and Manafort, etc admit the contacts and the UK report is now public via multiple investigations.


Those things all DID happen and there is no instance, NONE where those types of things happening would not just justify but REQUIRE the FB to open an investigation.

Answer my question.
 
House is run by the Republican Party.

Not when Swalwell was investigated for this. Adam Schiff was the committee chair with 11 other Democrats on the committee. Pelosi was Speaker. It was a complete cover up.

https://nypost.com/2020/12/09/house-republicans-not-told-about-swalwells-relationship-with-spy/
https://www.reddit.com/r/NextNewsNe...ing_the_coverup_what_really_happened_between/
https://thehill.com/opinion/nationa...-spy-a-lesson-in-how-china-is-undermining-us/
 
Back
Top