We're a pro-choice nation

Frank Apisa said:
My comment did not have to do with denial or confirmation.

It had to do with the fact that your response was laughable.

I thought I made that clear by suggesting your comment "looks as though it were written by a not especially intelligent five year old", but apparently you have a problem with clarity whether it is making your comments clear...or understanding the clarity of other people's remarks.
Click to expand...

You show you can't handle facts and truth
 
PostmodernProphet said:
science is not your friend......especially when you lie about it......

https://americanpregnancy.org/healthy-pregnancy/week-by-week/baby-development-month-by-month/

Ultrasound-Scan.webp
Click to expand...

Indeed.

Before a child is born, it is an unborn child.

After a child is born, it is a born child.

Pay attention , Marty.
 
BartenderElite said:
And getting more so. Close to 60% consistently in polls support a woman's right to choose.

Everyone has the same goal: make abortions rare.

But keep them legal. It's middle ages stuff to ban them.
Click to expand...

The only thing I have to say about the issue…and I know what I am about to say will offend Catholics which is not my intent but facts are facts, both extremes of the abortion issue are morally objectionable.

Abortion for any reason at any time during a pregnancy is morally objectionable and abortion for no reason whatsoever is morally objectionable. Those are facts.

It would be more accurate that a super majority of Americans believe abortion should be legal with limitations and that those limitations should have exceptions for extraordinary circumstances.

Which means this is an issue in which compromise must be made but for compromise to work it must be predicated on a woman’s right to bodily self autonomy.

This is not an issue in which a government magistrate or legislature should have sole authority in making these decisions and those who’s beliefs on the issue are based on religion well no religious authority should ever, from a legal standpoint, should have no say whatsoever.
 
ptif219 said:
You show you can't refute the facts of my posts
Click to expand...

Most of the time your posts are so garbled that if there are any "facts"...they are indiscernible.

Name one "fact" that you have offered with which you suppose I disagree...that you also suppose I cannot refute. I will refute it...almost certainly easily.
 
Guille said:
If you were Patient Zero and the gubbermint had to kill you and dissect you to protect others would you be alright with that?
Click to expand...

That is not how reality works. You want to quarantine a Patient Zero, and keep them alive. While alive, they will keep whatever disease alive, so the medical community can work out how to fight it. Dissecting a Patient Zero does nobody any good.
 
Walt said:
That is not how reality works. You want to quarantine a Patient Zero, and keep them alive. While alive, they will keep whatever disease alive, so the medical community can work out how to fight it. Dissecting a Patient Zero does nobody any good.
Click to expand...

I didn't ask you jack shit.

And you also don't know jack shit so shut it.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Most of the time your posts are so garbled that if there are any "facts"...they are indiscernible.

Name one "fact" that you have offered with which you suppose I disagree...that you also suppose I cannot refute. I will refute it...almost certainly easily.
Click to expand...

Why so you can do more gobbleygook spin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top