Shooting at Texas mall leaves multiple people injured

Jarod said:
Depends on the wording, it would not have to… But it certainly could. We had a ban on such rifles after it passed during the Clinton years.
Click to expand...

I have stayed out of this thread waiting and watching for the uninformed to post of which you have done a couple of times. You, having little or no knowledge of firearms, in an effort to keep yourself from speaking further on the topic should wait and watch. Being the full time lawyer you claim to be, your knowledge as to how to change the 2nd amendment leads me to believe you are an unemployed wannabe.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Hmm.. It seems you don't know much about guns.

Lever action, pump action and revolvers are not semi-automatic and none of them are considered single shot.

But I suppose you will be telling us that "The Rifleman" proves that a lever action can shoot just as fast as a semi-automatic.
Click to expand...

Go away and consult with the Subway sandwich boy until you can bring something accurate to the table.


 
Jarod said:
The United States of America.
Click to expand...

Uh huh.

If the Senate proposed a national referendum to test public opinion, red states by and large would not go along, blue states by and large would go along, the NRA would have a shit fit. In any case, there is no law that forbids it.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
preserved for posterity.......we'll see if you post again if this isn't true.....
Click to expand...

Dude, I have lived in Texas long enough to know how our Republican governor and Republican Mayors work together to suppress information they do not want the public to know after a mass shooting here in Texas.

Had this been a Black or Mexican Shooter and White people were killed, it would have been MEGAPHONED out to the public within minutes by these same Republican State and Local GUNTARDED and RACIST Leaders with the blood of the murderer's fresh on their hands. Because they know damn well that their lax gun laws here, put in place by the governor, is what is making all of these Mass Shootings possible, likely, and obvious to everyone. And they are equally to blame for these mass shootings as the one behind the trigger.

Next!
 
Last edited:
martin said:
Uh huh.

If the Senate proposed a national referendum to test public opinion, red states by and large would not go along, blue states by and large would go along, the NRA would have a shit fit. In any case, there is no law that forbids it.
Click to expand...

How are you going to pass a procedure for a national referendum when the Reds are against it? How would you give the referendum any legal effect?
 
Jarod said:
How are you going to pass a procedure for a national referendum when the Reds are against it? How would you give the referendum any legal effect?
Click to expand...

It would not have legal effect. I agree it wouldn't happen, only suggested that if it did happen the guns would lose.
 
martin said:
It would not have legal effect. I agree it wouldn't happen, only suggested that if it did happen the guns would lose.
Click to expand...

Horse mierda, Marty.

If the left thought that they could amend the Constitution and void the Second Amendment, you would have already done so.

Those 400 million plus guns that are owned by Americans are an indication that guns are desired by Americans.

If you doubt this, amend the Constitution…if you can.
 
Last edited:
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Looks like I was right and you aren't willing to admit you said what we all saw you say.
Click to expand...

What I posted is true.

Hand levered guns fire one shot, until they are levered again.

This is the definition of a semi-automatic, the trigger must be pulled again.

Those one shots, until levered, would be banned because they would be considered semi-automatics, just like the AR’s.

I own a true one shot gun, a shotgun, a .410. A beautiful gun for quail hunting, the pattern is good, up to 30-40 yards. Beyond that, the pattern is so broad, it is nearly ineffective.
 
Last edited:
Earl said:
Horse mierda, Marty.

If the left thought that they could amend the Constitution and void the Second Amendment, you would have already done so.

Those 400 million plus guns that are owned by Americans are an indication that guns are desired by Americans.

If you doubt this, amend the Constitution…if you can.
Click to expand...

The gun manufacturers deliberately misread the 2nd to sell more guns. The gun-lust people accepted that lie because that love, love, them some guns. The 2nd does not require an amendment, but simply an honest reading.
 
Earl said:
Horse mierda, Marty.

If the left thought that they could amend the Constitution and void the Second Amendment, you would have already done so.

Those 400 million plus guns that are owned by Americans are an indication that guns are desired by Americans.

If you doubt this, amend the Constitution…if you can.
Click to expand...

Popular opinion will not void or have any effect on the Second Amendment, nor has banning "semi assault" weapons, which under several state laws that encompass and ban AR-15's, changed the Second Amendment. One significance of those laws has been the absence of any attempt supported by the NRA or any gun group to overturn them at the Supreme Court. Similarly the national ban for many years, now expired, was never appealed to the Court. I don't wonder why.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top