Man charged in shooting of Black teen at his front door

martin said:
He wouldn’t win the case. You don’t shoot someone for no discernible cause other than ringing your doorbell.
Click to expand...

The alt right loses the case on the facts, so they must make up absurd claims to try to reverse that.
 
Walt said:
The alt right loses the case on the facts, so they must make up absurd claims to try to reverse that.
Click to expand...

All the facts are not in, Walter but with your racism, you prefer to ignore that the shooter says he is innocent.
 
The shooter's grandson was interviewed on television yesterday, said the old man sat in his chair all day watching FOX News and was steeped in Right wing paranoia.
 
martin said:
The shooter's grandson was interviewed on television yesterday, said the old man sat in his chair all day watching FOX News and was steeped in Right wing paranoia.
Click to expand...

So, Marty, you convict a man because he watches FOX?

Nice, Marty...nice.

How about CNN, do you get convicted for watching CNN?

The epidemic of crime in cities controlled by far left Democratic Socialists is not paranoia, Marty, it's a fact.
 
Earl said:
All the facts are not in, Walter but with your racism, you prefer to ignore that the shooter says he is innocent.
Click to expand...

The kid went to the wrong address to pickup his brothers. He rung the front doorbell, and was shot. There is no way you can make the kid a criminal, even though he has black skin.
 
Walt said:
The kid went to the wrong address to pickup his brothers. He rung the front doorbell, and was shot. There is no way you can make the kid a criminal, even though he has black skin.
Click to expand...

The kid's guilt or innocence will be determined by the courts, Walter, not by you. Or by his skin color. You appear to be obsessed with skin color, Walter.

The police also said that it is not a racial issue, why are you trying to make it a racial issue, Walter?

That's raacist (sic) Walter.

Why are you a racist, Walter, that's unattractive.
 
Walter, along with being a racist, is also a misogynist.

He supports men participating, unfairly, in women's sports and men in little girl's bathrooms.

Poor Walter.
 
Last edited:
Walter is furiously typing, trying to deny the obvious...that he is a racist and a misogynist.

Walter, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...it's probably a duck.
 
Earl said:
The kid's guilt or innocence will be determined by the courts, Walter, not by you.
Click to expand...

Probably not. He is not even accused of a crime. There is no crime on the books that could apply to him. We are left with the alt right desperately claiming his brothers might not exist, which is not a court case. No, I just do not see a case against this poor kid ever going to court.

Can you even name a crime that the kid could be charged with?

Earl said:
The police also said that it is not a racial issue, why are you trying to make it a racial issue, Walter?
Click to expand...

No, they did not. The prosecutor said, "I can tell you there was a racial component to this case."

What I am saying is that the alt right racism does not change the basic facts of this case. There is no crime that the kid could be charged with. He went to pickup his brothers. He rung a front doorbell. These are all legal actions.

Earl said:
Why are you a racist, Walter, that's unattractive.
Click to expand...

Seriously, if the 6 year old girl had been Black, and her shooter was white, would you be saying that we have to prove her innocent in court before we can even say shooting her was wrong?
 
Earl said:
Walter, along with being a racist, is also a misogynist.

He supports men participating, unfairly, in women's sports.
Click to expand...

I support sports leagues figuring out for themselves what rules to put in place. These things should not be decided by Congress. Seizing all sports is fascist.
 
Earl said:
Walter is furiously typing, trying to deny the obvious...that he is a racist and a misogynist.

Walter, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...it's probably a duck.
Click to expand...

It really makes Earl angry when I confront racism.
 
Walt said:
Probably not. He is not even accused of a crime. There is no crime on the books that could apply to him. We are left with the alt right desperately claiming his brothers might not exist, which is not a court case. No, I just do not see a case against this poor kid ever going to court.

Can you even name a crime that the kid could be charged with?



No, they did not. The prosecutor said, "I can tell you there was a racial component to this case."

What I am saying is that the alt right racism does not change the basic facts of this case. There is no crime that the kid could be charged with. He went to pickup his brothers. He rung a front doorbell. These are all legal actions.



Seriously, if the 6 year old girl had been Black, and her shooter was white, would you be saying that we have to prove her innocent in court before we can even say shooting her was wrong?
Click to expand...

Wrong, Walter, the kid could have made a terrorist threat against the homeowner. That's illegal.

Your president said to buy a shotgun and shoot through the door.

Was he wrong...Walter?
 
Earl said:
Wrong, Walter, the kid could have made a terrorist threat against the homeowner. That's illegal.
Click to expand...

There are two witnesses to the events, including Lester the homeowner. Both say that did not happen. It makes no sense that someone coming to pickup their brothers would suddenly for no reason start threatening people. AND NO ONE SAYS IT HAPPENED!!!

But Earl is so racist, that he thinks that just because Yarl is Black, he is probably a criminal.

So tell us Earl, is there a chance that the white victims might have made terrorist threats against their shooters? Is this sudden "anything is possible" belief limited to Blacks?

If we applied Earl's crazy legal theory without regard to race, we would have to call off the manhunt for the guy who shot the 6 year old girl, because "maybe she did something to provoke it", and "we are not allowed to make any accusations against the shooter, until the victim has been proven innocent in court."
 
Walt said:
We are a country that sentences 18 year olds to life without parole, so why not sentence an 85 year old to life without parole? Who is more likely to reform their lives, an 18 year old, or an 85 year old? Or put another way, that 18 year old will one day be a 85 year old who will have to spend the rest of his life in prison for something he did 67 years before.
Click to expand...

Fine. Drag his raggedy ass into the street and shoot him in the head like a rabid dog.

IMO, he's demented and unlikely to be rehabilitated. If you feel better about executing him or throwing him into a hole, fine. I'm more concerned about 1) making sure he's rendered harmless and 2) the cost to society.

Prison costs about $30K/year for each inmate. It's a drain on society to needlessly imprison people.
 
Walt said:
There are two witnesses to the events, including Lester the homeowner. Both say that did not happen. It makes no sense that someone coming to pickup their brothers would suddenly for no reason start threatening people. AND NO ONE SAYS IT HAPPENED!!!

But Earl is so racist, that he thinks that just because Yarl is Black, he is probably a criminal.

So tell us Earl, is there a chance that the white victims might have made terrorist threats against their shooters? Is this sudden "anything is possible" belief limited to Blacks?

If we applied Earl's crazy legal theory without regard to race, we would have to call off the manhunt for the guy who shot the 6 year old girl, because "maybe she did something to provoke it", and "we are not allowed to make any accusations against the shooter, until the victim has been proven innocent in court."
Click to expand...


Huh?
 
Walt said:
There are two witnesses to the events, including Lester the homeowner. Both say that did not happen. It makes no sense that someone coming to pickup their brothers would suddenly for no reason start threatening people. AND NO ONE SAYS IT HAPPENED!!!

But Earl is so racist, that he thinks that just because Yarl is Black, he is probably a criminal.

So tell us Earl, is there a chance that the white victims might have made terrorist threats against their shooters? Is this sudden "anything is possible" belief limited to Blacks?

If we applied Earl's crazy legal theory without regard to race, we would have to call off the manhunt for the guy who shot the 6 year old girl, because "maybe she did something to provoke it", and "we are not allowed to make any accusations against the shooter, until the victim has been proven innocent in court."
Click to expand...

There is no manhunt for the shooter of the six year old White girl Walter.

He surrendered in Florida, a DeSantis state.

He also has an extensive rap sheet Walter.

Why do you continue with the racist posts, Walter?

That's unattractive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top