Experts Say The Bud Light Boycott Is Totally Backfiring On The Boycotters

I don't think they'd care. You clearly don't understand (and you don't have to agree with them to understand them) the "alt right."

Someone else got some free beer as part of a promotion. No beer was taken from anyone, and no one suffered. Why should that be a crime?
 
It was my mistake though, I confused the cheap beer with another. Miller and Coors are seperateky owned.

The problem, again, is that Coors/Miller beer owner is also woke and supports LBGQT, so it’s still a woke company.

Hiring Kid Rock will not change their past and I imagine continued support.

 
Man law... :awesome:

Three things strike me about the "Man Law":
1) It is a blatant copy of the "Bro Code".
2) It is only meant as a joke. It is quite funny, but you do not have to live your life based on a comedy sketch.
3) They are meant to lesson conflict.

The last one applies here. Someone else got some free beer. This person makes life choices you would not make. Is this a cause for violent threats?

Almost certainly the Man Law would say no. Wish Mulvaney the best on her free beer, and on living a life that makes her happy. Then, move on.
 
I don't think they'd care.

You clearly don't understand (and you don't have to agree with them to understand them) the "alt right."
They care. JPP proves it daily.

Care to explain it then, Terry? Do you agree White Nationalism is a more accurate term for them?
 
Someone else got some free beer as part of a promotion. No beer was taken from anyone, and no one suffered. Why should that be a crime?

Who said it was a "crime?" I simply stated that the "alt right" beer drinkers, as you called them, want no part of stuff associated openly with trans-gay stuff. It isn't them any more than having a very feminine beer ad would be, and likely far less so. This is a case of "know your customer." Clearly the management at A-B who okayed this commercial had no clue about their customer's views, likes, and dislikes.
 
Three things strike me about the "Man Law":
1) It is a blatant copy of the "Bro Code".
2) It is only meant as a joke. It is quite funny, but you do not have to live your life based on a comedy sketch.
3) They are meant to lesson conflict.

The last one applies here. Someone else got some free beer. This person makes life choices you would not make. Is this a cause for violent threats?

Almost certainly the Man Law would say no. Wish Mulvaney the best on her free beer, and on living a life that makes her happy. Then, move on.

It also is very, highly, likely that it resonates with the target customer base buying that product. If you put on a commercial or ad campaign that doesn't positively reach your intended customer base--particularly as it already exists--then you are doing something wrong.
 
An expected reply, Terry, since you side with them all the time.

Does a single Neo-Nazi or White Supremacist think they are the "bad guys" in America?

On the other hand, you seem to think that anybody to the Right of AOC is a Neo-Nazi White supremacist...
 
On the other hand, you seem to think that anybody to the Right of AOC is a Neo-Nazi White supremacist...
I'm not a Neo-Nazi White Supremacist, Terry, but you've supported overthrowing the Federal government, racism and other bigotry. Who does that make you right of?
 
Who said it was a "crime?" I simply stated that the "alt right" beer drinkers, as you called them, want no part of stuff associated openly with trans-gay stuff. It isn't them any more than having a very feminine beer ad would be, and likely far less so. This is a case of "know your customer." Clearly the management at A-B who okayed this commercial had no clue about their customer's views, likes, and dislikes.

I do not like country music. If a product I liked made a country music commercial, it would not discourage me from buying that product. I would just be happy someone else enjoyed the product I liked.

You are so upset someone else is enjoying Bud Light, you want to destroy it. That is just sad.
 
It also is very, highly, likely that it resonates with the target customer base buying that product. If you put on a commercial or ad campaign that doesn't positively reach your intended customer base--particularly as it already exists--then you are doing something wrong.

Technically the reverse is true. If you put out an ad that only positively reaches your already existing customers, you are doing something very wrong. Ads are meant to draw in new customers.
 
Back
Top