Bearded Woman breaks Canadian weightlifting record held by white lib Trans a**hole

i just commented on what you posted...your interpretation of his post is incorrect....a body part can't hold a record, silly...;) So you called trans people "a.......s"...That's obvious to everyone but you, apparently...;)

Well if that's true, then in order for Bigdogturd to have called the trans person in question an asshole, it would have necessitated that he be personally familiar or aquatinted with said trans person.

Since that probably is not likely, then your interpretation of my interpretation of his remarks is equally invalid.

Based on that lack of likelihood, I merely surmised that Bigdogturd was referring to the trans person's anatomical asshole, rather than any personal traits or behavioral characteristics of his.

So then it comes down to a matter of opinion.

You have yours and I have mine.

Mine is that Bigdogturd is obsessed with the assholes of transgender people.

As to why, one can only speculate.

Oh, and BTW, it is entirely possible for a body part to hold a record.

I'm sure there have been many throughout history that have and stilloccupy space in the Guinness Book.
 
Who'd have thought that the only feminist to protest men competing in female sports ... would be a bearded manly man?
 
004_jpg-2777027-jpg.1250282
 
I hate to read stories like this,
I'll readily admit,
but they're hardly an exixtential threat to society.

I argue against the right leaning derps here constantly but this is an issue that should not be hand waved away.

Something is not right or wrong based on volume. It is either right or wrong.

The entire reason Women's sport evolved as its own separate thing was due to biological differences between men and women. To give those with a female biology a place to seek excellence.

Sporting Regulation bodies did not foresee the split between Gender and Biology (which is fine) and they made a mistake at the beginning not simply declaring 'All divisions will continue to be aligned by biology", and instead allowed the narrative that 'if it is a woman's division, that is gender and thus trans women should be allowed to compete too'.

Aligning divisions by biological sex at the onset is absolutely fair to everyone as it is the same consistent standard for everyone, and it fixes this problem.

The only argument i have heard against it, is that then the trans women would struggle to win (no is obligated to be able to win) and that it makes them 'stand out' (no one is obligated to compete).

The concept of Competitive Sport has always been one of a 'Fair Playing Field'. The biological female body has to have a place to compete against same. A reply, we here of 'the numbers or trans women are small so we should allow it' cannot be allowed as an excuse to harm the small number of biological women they are impacting. It is still unfair and wrong.
 
Something is not right or wrong based on volume. It is either right or wrong.


This is absolutely correct. The "volume," as you phrased it, is absolutely a non-factor in whether something is right or wrong.

Unfortunately, it often is a factor in the extent to which one may think about it.

Women's sports are of course important to the participants and those who choose to follow them.
They just happen to be completely irrelevant to me.
I'm a former professional athlete, and sports of any kind barely hold my attention anymore.

Thus, while I believe that there's no place for the transgendered in sport,

and that not being able to participate in competitive [as opposed to recreational] sports is no huge sacrifice

since the vast majority of all people aren't the least bit athletic anyway,

it doesn't impact my own life enough for me to understand

why it's such a hot topic here on the forum.

That's the only point that I was trying to make.
 
Would the Democrat Brown Shirts that chased and punched Riley Gaines do the same to this woman ...

FsPlPaBaEAY_zU2.jpg
 
Back
Top