Democrats & Blacks Should Pay Reparations to White Republicans

Libhater

Libhater

Verified User
San Fran-Sicko proposes a $5 million lump-sum payment for each eligible Black person which could make San Fran-Sicko the first major
U.S. city to fund reparations.

So lets take a deep look into why any reparations are to be paid for past dirty deeds of black slavery, and to whom exactly should be
receiving those payments.

It was a White Republican president (Lincoln) who pushed policy ahead to abolish the Democrats' stronghold on their slavery agenda by
issuing The Emancipation Proclamation. That act alone by Lincoln makes it a more qualified reason to have the newly freed Blacks and the
hostage-crime taking of slaves by Democrats to pay we White republicans for the Black freedom they now enjoy.

Second: Blacks of today should not only be thankful for the White Republican Lincoln's abolition policy, but should also be thankful for the
U.S. fighting a civil war where over 600,000 mostly White men lost their lives to ensure that Blacks would indeed be free from their
Democrat slave-holding masters, so in retrospect, they (Blacks & Democrats) should rightly be paying reparations to all White people with
the majority of them being of course Republicans.

Look, I'm not greedy as those are in Kalifornicator where each Black would receive $5 million for criminal acts done by Democrats. No, I
would gladly accept a one-time payment of a cool $1 million dollars. Surely the race baiter obama or the communist billionaire George
Soros could help fund those reparations to we White Republicans.

Blacks of today should also be appreciative of the fact that it was an entire group of WHITE Colonists/Founders that created this greatest
nation on earth, and gave their Black immigrants who left their 3rd world nations to enjoy the freedoms here in America that were given
to them by all White men.

If you're a Black Republican then you get a much deserved free pass in paying reparations to we White Republicans. I'm always looking
after all freedom loving Americans of any stripe.
 
From his early 20s, Lincoln always believed that slavery was an immora institution and that it should be prohibited in the US.

However he made a distiction between Black slaves being liberated and liberated Black slaves being integrated into the mainstream of White American culture.

He did not believe that freed Black slaves were capable of harmoniously assimilating peacefully in mainstream American society. In one speech, he stated that freeing Black slaves was one thing, but granting then full civil and political rights was another proposition altoghter and he did not support it. He even alluded in one of his speech to there being a "physical" difference between White Americans and Blacks. He was referring , I think, to what we would now describe as a genetic difference between the two races.

It's worth remembering that Lincoln's 1863 "Proclamation of Emancipation" was NOT a moral document; rather it was strictly a war policy (most Americans don't know this). Lincoln needed more troops in 1863, as the Civil War was beginning to turn against the Union army. By emancipating the nation's Blacks and offering them a place to fight in the Union Army, he hoped to bolster his manpower. The strategy was successful and materially helped turn the tide of war against the South.


After the war, Lincoln decided that it would be best for all concerned if the freed Blacks in America were repatriated to a suitable foreign country (like Liberia) and he actually began to implement this policy. Unfortunately he was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth (a crazy Democrat) and his repatriation project died with him.



If you look back over the history of race relations between Blacks and White Americans since Lincoln's death, it has been one long litany of hatred, violence, rioting, bitter greivance and political/social strife and conflict of all kinds. Lincoln predicted this would be the case and he was dead right. Of course, by daring to point this out, I will be branded a racist/Nazi/Fascist but the truth is on my side. It not a pleasant truth but it is the truth all the same: the Black psych/culture is not compatible with the more advanced White Anglo-American psyche and its culture. It's as simple as that - you can't mix oil and water, no matter how hard you try.



Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!
 
Dachshund said:
From his early 20s, Lincoln always believed that slavery was an immora institution and that it should be prohibited in the US.

However he made a distiction between Black slaves being liberated and liberated Black slaves being integrated into the mainstream of White American culture.

He did not believe that freed Black slaves were capable of harmoniously assimilating peacefully in mainstream American society. In one speech, he stated that freeing Black slaves was one thing, but granting then full civil and political rights was another proposition altoghter and he did not support it. He even alluded in one of his speech to there being a "physical" difference between White Americans and Blacks. He was referring , I think, to what we would now describe as a genetic difference between the two races.

It's worth remembering that Lincoln's 1863 "Proclamation of Emancipation" was NOT a moral document; rather it was strictly a war policy (most Americans don't know this). Lincoln needed more troops in 1863, as the Civil War was beginning to turn against the Union army. By emancipating the nation's Blacks and offering them a place to fight in the Union Army, he hoped to bolster his manpower. The strategy was successful and materially helped turn the tide of war against the South.


After the war, Lincoln decided that it would be best for all concerned if the freed Blacks in America were repatriated to a suitable foreign country (like Liberia) and he actually began to implement this policy. Unfortunately he was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth (a crazy Democrat) and his repatriation project died with him.



If you look back over the history of race relations between Blacks and White Americans since Lincoln's death, it has been one long litany of hatred, violence, rioting, bitter greivance and political/social strife and conflict of all kinds. Lincoln predicted this would be the case and he was dead right. Of course, by daring to point this out, I will be branded a racist/Nazi/Fascist but the truth is on my side. It not a pleasant truth but it is the truth all the same: the Black psych/culture is not compatible with the more advanced White Anglo-American psyche and its culture. It's as simple as that - you can't mix oil and water, no matter how hard you try.



Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!
Click to expand...

Couple of things: You are basically correct in most of what you posted here. Lincoln did want to send the Blacks to Liberia where they
wouldn't be subjected to any more of the democrat slave mastering. But the Democrat party/politics remains today where they (the politicians)
and the help of the government have kept minorities (mostly Blacks) and poor people enslaved by an overpowering govt that gives them
freebies that makes them ever dependent (cradle to grave) on them--similar to black slaves being dependent on their democrat masters to even
survive back in the days of the mid 19th century.

So again, if there are to be reparations made for slavery, shouldn't the monies be paid out by blacks and or especially democrats as a whole?
Blacks paying we Whites for saving them from slavery and hangings by the democrats, and the democrats for being the anti black racists and
slave masters that they were, and for keeping them down on the slave-style govt plantation of hopelessness in today's culture?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I actually think San Fran should do this. This would entice so many blacks to move there and completely bankrupt SF forever.
Click to expand...

Not happening, but if it did, one would have to prove they were born there and resided there for the majority of their lives, try to keep up
 
I believe that before we address these minor issues,
every Italian-America in the United states should get a one time lump sum payment of five million dollars
because of how we've been portrayed as criminals on television and in motion pictures.

In truth, with only a very few exceptions like Ron DeSantis, Rudy Giuliani, and Steve Scalise,
it's virtually impossible to name even one real Italian-American criminal.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I believe that before we address these minor issues,
every Italian-America in the United states should get a one time lump sum payment of five million dollars
because of how we've been portrayed as criminals on television and in motion pictures.

In truth, with only a very few exceptions like Ron DeSantis, Rudy Giuliani, and Steve Scalise,
it's virtually impossible to name even one real Italian-American criminal.
Click to expand...

Minor issues? Every black kalifornicator citizen to get a lump sum payment of $5 million dollars just for having a
black skin color is considered to be minor? And what ethnicity of people do you suppose made up the criminal
Mafia mobsters here in America? Most of them were Italians robbing and murdering to get millions of dollars, and
you say they should get payment reparations for being wealthy criminals? LOL!
 
Last edited:
4gj40l.jpg
 
Dachshund said:
From his early 20s, Lincoln always believed that slavery was an immora institution and that it should be prohibited in the US.

However he made a distiction between Black slaves being liberated and liberated Black slaves being integrated into the mainstream of White American culture.

He did not believe that freed Black slaves were capable of harmoniously assimilating peacefully in mainstream American society. In one speech, he stated that freeing Black slaves was one thing, but granting then full civil and political rights was another proposition altoghter and he did not support it. He even alluded in one of his speech to there being a "physical" difference between White Americans and Blacks. He was referring , I think, to what we would now describe as a genetic difference between the two races.

It's worth remembering that Lincoln's 1863 "Proclamation of Emancipation" was NOT a moral document; rather it was strictly a war policy (most Americans don't know this). Lincoln needed more troops in 1863, as the Civil War was beginning to turn against the Union army. By emancipating the nation's Blacks and offering them a place to fight in the Union Army, he hoped to bolster his manpower. The strategy was successful and materially helped turn the tide of war against the South.


After the war, Lincoln decided that it would be best for all concerned if the freed Blacks in America were repatriated to a suitable foreign country (like Liberia) and he actually began to implement this policy. Unfortunately he was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth (a crazy Democrat) and his repatriation project died with him.

Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!
Click to expand...

Your check is in the mail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top