ExpressLane
Verified User
So you admit the Times and the Guardian mislead Trump.The Times and Trump both lied. I read the Times and Guardian articles, neither one was based on any solid sources.
So you admit the Times and the Guardian mislead Trump.The Times and Trump both lied. I read the Times and Guardian articles, neither one was based on any solid sources.
Trump should have known better than to believe the lying New York Times.![]()
So you admit the Times and the Guardian mislead Trump.
How much do you love the fact that the Democrats are Kicking your asses in the elections?![]()
A person should not be misled by a story that says "A Manhattan grand jury could decide whether to indict Donald J. Trump in the says ahead." Especially when it is in a source he says is fake news. I don't think he was misled. I think he just tried to use the story for publicity. The Times obviously based the story on some source who did not accurately gage the situation.
Nobody could accurately say if an indictment would occur since they do not know how grand jury members will vote.
The fact that we are discussing it now shows both Trump and the Times achieved their objective--a good story with legs.
I like how you have to change the subject. Start a thread and we'll talk there. Otherwise just admit that after 7 fucking years you have NOTHING on trump. Either he's a master mind or you idiots just like stepping on your dicks. It stated out being funny but now just sad to watch you idiots. You're like a punch drunk fighter shadow boxing with yourself.
None of that concerns Democrats! Sorry about you losing focus!
What concerns Democrats is winning elections and Keeping America Great!
Every trump thread in this site is started by giu retards.
Like this Trump thread? Liar!
Every trump thread in this site is started by giu retards. Stop pretending. We know what concerns you and it's not America.
Sir! You seem to be struggling with being in the minority of voters now!
You may want to ask yourself how that happened, instead of continuing to send more voters our way!
The fake news press is trying to spin this as scheduled but that's BS. They have no case and trump outsmarted them a couple weeks back when he said they were planning to arrest him.
You should change the subject
Indeed, Grok.
They are probably looking to replace the jurors on the Grand jury.
The present ones seem to think it's a nothing-burger.
This didn't age well at allThe fake news press is trying to spin this as scheduled but that's BS. They have no case and trump outsmarted them a couple weeks back when he said they were planning to arrest him.
Only about half the states use them. We can't get rid of them at the federal level because the 5th Amendment requires them.
1. The constitution can be amended
2. The 5A says a grand jury is required only for a "capital, or otherwise infamous crime."
3. Trump was indicted by the state not the feds. In fact Bragg is just a county DA!!!