Matt Dillon
Retardium User
So tell us which law makes it a crime to have classified information you don't know you have.
That is what I keep asking and no one has yet informed me of such a law.
Ignorance is no excuse when it comes to the law.
So tell us which law makes it a crime to have classified information you don't know you have.
That is what I keep asking and no one has yet informed me of such a law.
They were declassified. He declassified them when he declassified everything pertaining to the Russiagate scam
When you willfully smuggle it out of the SCIF you commit a felony. Now you tell me how Biden got it out of a SCIF accidentally. BAM you have been informed!
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924
the one you want to use against Trump......
Why has Trump refused to say in a court of law that he has declassified them?
By the way, if you bothered to read the law then you would know having information that can be used to harm the US is the crime. It doesn't need to be classified. But the biggest problem for Trump is his refusal to comply with the subpoena which asked for documents with classification markings. If the document contains classification markings it is covered by the subpoena even if he had declassified it.
Ignorance is no excuse when it comes to the law.
Trump de-classified the documents and he hasn't been asked in a court of law, dummy.
But Dearie said that if Trump’s lawyers will not actually assert that the records have been declassified, and the department of justice makes an acceptable case that they remain classified, he will be inclined to regard them as classified.
“As far as I’m concerned,” he said, “that’s the end of it.”
Trump has claimed publicly that he declassified the government records that were taken from Mar-a-Lago. Trump’s legal team has not made such an argument in ongoing litigation surrounding access to the documents, and in court filings on Monday his team said they opposed having to shortly disclose “specific information regarding declassification,” as the Justice Department (DOJ) had requested,
Correct. Ignorance of the law is no excuse when people claim a law was broken. Perhaps they need to stop being ignorant of the law and actually read the law.
Someone can't be found guilty of a law that requires willful intent if you can't prove willful intent.
Trump de-classified the documents and he hasn't been asked in a court of law, dummy.
Interesting guy, said he really liked trumps policies but, “wow what an asshole”.
I don’t agree with him on a lot, but he was refreshingly, honest for a Washington insider. I was impressed by that.
He said he doesn’t think they can get him on anything related to January 6, but he is in bad trouble on the classified documents.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/specific_intent
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/specific-and-general-intent-crimes.html
specific intent crimes will require a prosecutor to prove that a defendant had both the desire to commit the act as well as the knowledge or intent that committing the act would achieve the end result.
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/blog/what-are-specific-intent-crimes/
While PC 470 uses the language, “intent to defraud,” other common intents listed in statutes include that the defendant acted:
knowingly,
purposely,
willfully, or
with recklessness.
If an accused did not break the law with one of these intent elements, then he/she cannot be found guilty of a specific intent offense.
Well, them classified documents back from when Biden was a Senator didn't find their way to his garage by osmosis.
Well, them classified documents back from when Biden was a Senator didn't find their way to his garage by osmosis.
No, they got there in boxes. Did you have a point, Sheriff?
No, they got there in boxes. Did you have a point, Sheriff?
Yeah. Why were they there, hmm?
That they were in a box and no one knew they were there isn't a crime. For it to be a crime there has to be specific intent. Willfully and knowingly are the terms in the law.
Bullshit. Biden took them and put them there. It's the only logical explanation.
That they were in a box and no one knew they were there isn't a crime. For it to be a crime there has to be specific intent. Willfully and knowingly are the terms in the law.