Palin angered by 'sexist' Newsweek cover

Onceler said:
I didn't read the article, but I don't get Newsweek's point at all; she's not a threat to the GOP, or anyone else. Her viability as a national candidate is basically over, and I don't even think she is interested in that anymore.

It looks like they just wanted an excuse to write a hit piece & ridicule her some more. I'm actually starting to feel a little bad for her...
Click to expand...
This is actually pretty much my take on it.

Other than the sorry for her part. I don't think she's aiming at the WH as so many think.
 
The religious right that has been courted over the last two decades will give her money and vote for her. They will clamour for her to run. It will be the path she sees to continued money and fame. She will run for that reason. They will vote for her SF no matter how stupid it is.

I tried to tell you the R party could not win with or without this crazy assed base they cultivated and now the chickens have come home to roost.

its going to harm my party too because the Rs wont be there to be the ones being bought buy the corps. The corps will nowe try harder to by dems and they will succede with some of them. They are merely humans and are flawed.
 
Superfreak said:
No, she will not. She is not a viable candidate. She may try to run in the primaries, but she will not have the support to get the nomination. So pretending that she is going to steal votes is ridiculous. Once the candidate is nominated, the voters who supported Palin will choose between the Rep and Obama.
Click to expand...

SHe will have the support. Republicans don't want the fascistocrats the party keeps putting up. Deal with the truth.
 
Topspin said:
Palin angered by 'sexist' Newsweek cover

Tue Nov 17, 2:41 pm ET
For the second time since Sarah Palin stepped into the national political spotlight, a photo of the former Republican vice-presidential candidate featured on the cover of Newsweek magazine is sparking controversy. Palin herself blasted the "out-of-context" cover as "sexist" on her Facebook page.


-- Brett Michael Dykes is a contributor to the Yahoo! News Blog
Click to expand...


I gotta go with the Pitbull with Lipstick on this one. That's a lame magazine cover, and what's the point of showing of her legs and bod? Except, for Cawacko's benefit.


Good christ, there's plenty of crap to complain about this appalling theocrat , without making her legs an issue.
 
Damocles said:
If she runs there will be people who would vote for her, however I do not believe that is where her map is leading her.
Click to expand...


She seeks Fame and money.

She wants fame most of all.

She will end up running because the fan base she has will demand it of her.

She will follow the paycheck and adoration
 
evince said:
The religious right that has been courted over the last two decades will give her money and vote for her. They will clamour for her to run. It will be the path she sees to continued money and fame. She will run for that reason. They will vote for her SF no matter how stupid it is.

I tried to tell you the R party could not win with or without this crazy assed base they cultivated and now the chickens have come home to roost.

its going to harm my party too because the Rs wont be there to be the ones being bought buy the corps. The corps will nowe try harder to by dems and they will succede with some of them. They are merely humans and are flawed.
Click to expand...

yeah we'll take the advice of a Progressive on how we are suppose to run as a party..
If I wanted to be a commie I would join the Democrat party..
 
Cypress said:
I gotta go with the Pitbull with Lipstick on this one. That's a lame magazine cover, and what's the point of showing of her legs and bod? Except, for Cawacko's benefit.


Good christ, there's plenty of crap to complain about this appalling theocrat , without making her legs an issue.
Click to expand...

bingo, but cypress wouldn't you relish Palin vs Obama

Or is it just me, I say Obama crushes her worse than he did the fossil
He'd beat her worse than Oregon beat USC, well maybe not that bad.
 
Damocles said:
This is actually pretty much my take on it.

Other than the sorry for her part. I don't think she's aiming at the WH as so many think.
Click to expand...

Yeah I agree with Oneceler as well. There were times before that I thought she tried to play up the victim card that I wasn't a big fan of it but this is a pretty transparent hack job. Then you throw in the AP putting 11 'fact checkers' on her book when they put zero fact checkers on many other big time politicians books and it's like damn!
 
Cypress said:
I gotta go with the Pitbull with Lipstick on this one. That's a lame magazine cover, and what's the point of showing of her legs and bod? Except, for Cawacko's benefit.


Good christ, there's plenty of crap to complain about this appalling theocrat , without making her legs an issue.
Click to expand...

I think the cover was wrong but I'm not going to lie, I did dig the picture! :)
 
Topspin said:
bingo, but cypress wouldn't you relish Palin vs Obama

Or is it just me, I say Obama crushes her worse than he did the fossil
He'd beat her worse than Oregon beat USC, well maybe not that bad.
Click to expand...

it would just be a very visible and classic case of liberal sexism. liberals are more than ready to have anyone but a white man in office while making derogatory remarks about racism when others object, but will quite willingly castigate a conservative woman while hypocritically declaring it not even closely related to objections over obama in office.
 
evince said:
She seeks Fame and money.

She wants fame most of all.

She will end up running because the fan base she has will demand it of her.

She will follow the paycheck and adoration
Click to expand...

Desh you've just described every politician on the planet.
 
meme said:
we knew it wouldn't take you Progressives very long to show the people they don't want what you all are selling...the Hugo is now below 50% approval from the American people..

think Carter and Reagan..:clink:
Click to expand...

CBS has him at 53%, Washington Post/ABC has him at 56%, CNN/Opinion Research has him at 55%, so let me guess: you're quoting Rasmussen as "the American people". :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top