Florida principal fired after display of Statute of David.

Third time...what is it with these far left loons wanting to show genitalia to six year olds?


“Whatever you do, do not let them known about the drawn dicks in textbooks.”

Tgat loon can not conjugate a verb.
 
Last edited:
Concart said:
More from the school board representative. It all makes sense now:

'We don’t have safe spaces for kids so they won’t be offended by a Halloween costume. We don’t use pronouns. We teach them phonics. We teach Singapore math. They learn to speak Latin. Every student learns a musical instrument. And by the way, a large number of our students are Title I, from poor families, underprivileged families. It’s not just rich white people. We don’t even pick our students; it’s a lottery. The mission of the school shows that standards are important—even poor people have standards.'

EVEN POOR PEOPLE HAVE STANDARDS.

Wow, could this jackass get more offensive?
Click to expand...

Something tells me that "poor people" is a dog whistle for "non-white people," esp. since he had to add "It's not just rich WHITE people."

And to answer your question, no, it is hard to see how he could get more offensive.
 
Poverty rate in the United States by ethnic group 2021

Statista
https://www.statista.com › ... › Economy
Sep 30, 2022 — In 2021, 19.5 percent of Black people living in the United States were living below the poverty line. This is compared to 8.2 percent of white people.
 
Earl said:
Classical learning, a teaching philosophy centered on a traditional Western liberal arts education does not include showing genitalia to six year olds...as the principal found out.
Click to expand...

It was sixth graders, who are ~12 or so, not 6-year-olds. You can't even get your self-righteous judgy attitude right. :laugh:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Something tells me that "poor people" is a dog whistle for "non-white people," esp. since he had to add "It's not just rich WHITE people."

And to answer your question, no, it is hard to see how he could get more offensive.
Click to expand...

Yep, I picked up on that too. And of course, he makes sure to say that they don't select the kids because.... well.... you know.

This Bishop guy is a racist scumbag who is obviously sexually repressed.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
It was sixth graders, who are ~12 or so, not 6-year-olds. You can't even get your self-righteous judgy attitude right. :laugh:
Click to expand...

The far left loons tried to teach perversion and porn to six year olds in Virginia and other states.

They failed as did this peincipal.
 
Fourth time...why do the far left loons want to show genitalia to six year olds...or 12 year olds?
 
the fascists are at it again

Why can't parents raise their kids in the manner they see fit?

If you want your kids to see art that shows the naked body - you can. You can't tell other parents what their values are though - that would be very fascist of you
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Oh for crying out loud. I remember looking at that when I was in grade school. We had a set of Encyclopedia Britannica that had lots of photos of classical sculpture and art. There were breasts and packages and behinds galore.
Click to expand...
So you were fascinated with the Encyclopedia.
 
The school boards can tell principals that they can not show statues with genitalia to 12-year olds.
 
Earl said:
The far left loons tried to teach perversion and porn to six year olds in Virginia and other states.

They failed as did this peincipal.
Click to expand...

You are certifiably insane, pEarl. Now you're so desperate to defend an idiot fellow racist that you're trying to claim that what (didn't) happen in some other state justifies freaking out over a classical piece of art in FL.

"Peincipal" looks a lot like penis. How very Freudian, pEarl. Thanks for illustrating where your desires lie. :laugh:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
You are certifiably insane, pEarl. Now you're so desperate to defend an idiot fellow racist that you're trying to claim that what (didn't) happen in some other state justifies freaking out over a classical piece of art in FL.

"Peincipal" looks a lot like penis. How very Freudian, pEarl. Thanks for illustrating where your desires lie. :laugh:
Click to expand...

You haven’t seen a penis since you turned 80, old woman.

Homosexuals are perverted deviants...abominations.

Virginia did stop the perverts from teaching their perversion to six year olds.
So has Florida.

Oh, look, the far left loon is calling someone a homosexual...as an ad hom.
 
Earl said:
You haven’t seen a penis since you turned 80, old woman.
Click to expand...

In an odd way that is true, since I'm not 80... or 70, yet. lol

Homosexuals are perverted deviants...abominations.

Virginia did stop the perverts from teaching their perversion to six year olds.
So has Florida.

Oh, look, the far left loon is calling someone a homosexual...as an ad hom.
Click to expand...

Why did you bring homosexuals into this conversation, pEarl? The word "penis" triggered you again? :rofl2:
 
guno said:
Wow I remember going on a school trip in grade school to the Metropolitan Museum of Art

oh the horror of it all!!!!!!! naked statues :eek:


https://www.metmuseum.org/
Click to expand...

Warped you for life, didn't it? lol

The last time we went to the Art Museum in St. Louis, they had a display of African art. One piece was a bare-breasted woman cupping her breasts and lifting them out as an offering. The plaque said that it was a depiction of hospitality, as symbolically she was offering her milk to her guests. There was a field trip of young to mid teenagers there, giggling at it. But no one quickly tossed a jacket over the exhibit. pEarl would have swooned in horror. :rofl2:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Warped you for life, didn't it? lol

The last time we went to the Art Museum in St. Louis, they had a display of African art. One piece was a bare-breasted woman cupping her breasts and lifting them out as an offering. The plaque said that it was a depiction of hospitality, as symbolically she was offering her milk to her guests. There was a field trip of young to mid teenagers there, giggling at it. But no one quickly tossed a jacket over the exhibit. pEarl would have swooned in horror. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

They read National Geographic to get off. It's certainly not for the articles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top