I think you are forgetting that Trump was a citizen of New York, in fact, NYC, at the time these alleged crimes occurred, and it is NYC who is investigating the case.
Trump lawyer: If he’s indicted ‘this is an all-out war’
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
I think you are forgetting that Trump was a citizen of New York, in fact, NYC, at the time these alleged crimes occurred, and it is NYC who is investigating the case.
Statute of Limitations is up for campaign offices. He can go to Texas but they are going to have to show he did something illegal there.
Yawn. Tell me when someone indicts Obama. That will happen..... never. You know why? HE DIDN'T COMMIT A FUCKING CRIME YOU KNUCKLEDRAGGING MORON.
Yup, and they likely wont impeach Biden... Guess why?
Let me take a stab at this one..... he didn't commit an impeachable offense?
Why is this so hard for them? I don't get it.
Yawn. Your opinion is about as meaningless as it could possibly be. So is your fucking lame ass website. What a joke.
Like I said. Don't commit a crime, you won't be indicted. It's that fucking simple.
LOL.. First there has to be some evidence of a crime before the investigation begins. An investigation that starts with evidence of a crime will quickly be thrown out of court even if they found evidence of the crime during the course of the investigation. There is that pesky little thing called the Constitution that grants rights to everyone, even ex-Presidents.
In the case of Trump, his lawyer testified to Congress of possible crimes.
If you have evidence of a crime by Obama, by all means tell us what it is.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
and you stupidly think that everybody in the history of the nation that's ever been indicted has committed a crime??????
you truly are ignorant and naive, at best.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
another blind, ignorant, and witless fool has spoken........
No. But I am certainly not going to accept the judgement of some moron on the internet over the justice system. Stop whining, snowflake.
Yes, you are all of that.
The fact that you can't provide any evidence of a crime by Obama and claim he should be investigated without evidence shows you are all of that.
Innocent people can and do get accused of a crime. Some even get convicted of a crime they didn't commit. But they get accused of a crime that actually or allegedly occurred like being accused of murder or rape. Someone may have falsely reported the crime but the investigation by authorities isn't started without some claim of the crime occurring and evidence being found that shows the crime did occur.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
a moron like you??? I wouldn't either.
you really should take a step back and just see how willfully ignorant you are because of political leanings.............but, whatever.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
apparently you don't read very well either, because I only said that any state COULD......................
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you would be better served by staying silent and just being thought a fool instead of opening your mouth and proving it.
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/...-that-never-occurred--it-happens-all-too-oft/
Convicted of a crime that never occurred? It happens all too often, law prof says
We are used to hearing about wrongful convictions in which a murderer walked free because an innocent person was misidentified. But when Jessica S. Henry, a professor at Montclair State University in New Jersey, was researching material for her course on wrongful convictions, she discovered that in one-third of all known exonerations, the conviction was wrongful because there had not even been a crime.
This discovery paved the way for her new book, Smoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened.
In the book, Henry recounts stories of disappearances that were deemed to be murders until the living “victim” was discovered, natural deaths that were deemed suspicious because of faulty forensic science, and fabricated accusations that sent innocent people to jail.
More importantly, Henry identifies the lapses at every stage of the justice system that can allow for these injustices to occur: from dishonest police officers to careless forensic labs, overzealous prosecutors, overworked defense attorneys, and overly permissive and underinformed judges. She also examines the forces at play that pressure innocent people into agreeing to plea deals in which they plead guilty to a crime that never happened. Unsurprisingly, marginalized people are most at risk of these no-crime wrongful convictions.
Any state COULD secede from the union. It doesn't mean they will or they will succeed in doing it.
But nice attempt to walk back this statement by you..
Bear in mind when replying to Stupider Than Most that until January 7, 2021 his title under his screen name was Oathkeeper/Threeper. That tells you all you need to know about his allegiance to the United States.
Deaths are deaths.
Because someone found a natural death to be suspicious doesn't make this a crime made up out of thin air. It simply means the evidence was circumstantial.
People that are missing for a long period of time are assumed dead. There is even a legal process to get them declared dead. Once again, the evidence is circumstantial.
In both instances, the evidence of an alleged crime existed before any person was investigated.
What you are suggesting is not about starting with a death and then getting the evidence wrong. You are suggesting starting with nothing and manufacturing evidence. I would love to see where someone has been convicted of murder and the person allegedly murdered was known to be alive at the time of the conviction or even the arrest.
We litigate in court in this country. Don't like it? Get the fuck out, traitor. We don't litigate on the internet, or on some stupid fucking website. Get it, or is this concept also beyond your grasp?