Trump lawyer: If he’s indicted ‘this is an all-out war’

SmarterthanYou said:
it's cute that you think you've got this all figured out, but you apparently do understand by admitting that NYS is doing this. I'm simply saying that other states will now go after ex presidents. Obama could be next.
Click to expand...

Simply not going to happen… There would have to be evidence of a crime.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I understand that the left hates States being separate political entities and want to do away with that status, but until they do so, you are going to have to understand that states and federal are two different things.
Click to expand...

Then why are you bitching about NY's investigation of Trump? Do you not understand that "states and federal are two different things?"
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I understand that the left hates States being separate political entities and want to do away with that status, but until they do so, you are going to have to understand that states and federal are two different things.
Click to expand...

Never said they are not. Dumbshit! Trump committed felonies, he has mis-categorized payment was a felony.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
what you can almost guarantee with this is that every state will begin their own investigation in to presidents of opposing parties and find some crime that they can be charged with........
Click to expand...

What Red State has jurisdiction over Obama?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I understand that the left hates States being separate political entities and want to do away with that status, but until they do so, you are going to have to understand that states and federal are two different things.
Click to expand...

We do? I did not know that. New York is a state and they have the goods on Trump. I agree that they should do the right thing and indict. Georgia is a state and Trump's crimes are on tape. That is tough to beat.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
They are free to do so. They are also restricted by the same US Constitution that restricts NY. Evidence of a crime is required for an indictment.
Click to expand...

And, it must be in that state. If every state begins an investigation of presidents of opposing parties, that makes those former presidents very busy little criminals to have allegedly committed crimes in so many different states.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
if the feds declined to indict trump, why would NY be able to do it? that being said, what I said was any state could go after Obama, if that state investigates and comes up with a crime that he committed..........
Click to expand...

Criminal statutes are totally different on a state and federal level. You should know that!
 
Nordberg said:
We do? I did not know that. New York is a state and they have the goods on Trump. I agree that they should do the right thing and indict. Georgia is a state and Trump's crimes are on tape. That is tough to beat.
Click to expand...

It's more accurate to say that leftist like and hate things based on political expediency. Leftists love blacks until they no longer want to stay on your plantation, "If you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black"
 
floridafan said:
Who posted this.

"if the feds declined to indict trump, why would NY be able to do it?"
Click to expand...

Because he broke NY state tax laws. He lied about the values of his real estate too. Trump had a lifetime of corruption and he appears to have to face the truth, at last.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
if the feds declined to indict trump, why would NY be able to do it? that being said, what I said was any state could go after Obama, if that state investigates and comes up with a crime that he committed..........
Click to expand...

The feds did not decline to indict Trump, but it happens all the time that a state prosecutes when the fed choses not to do so.

A state wanting to prosecute Obama would have to have some jurisdiction. What Red State has jurisdiction over anything Obama does?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so your point is that NY is going after trump with a state statute? right?

why wouldn't any other state be able to indict an ex president if found to have broken one of their state laws?
Click to expand...

If someone broke a state law, they should be held responsible regardless of who they are.
 
Jarod said:
The feds did not decline to indict Trump, but it happens all the time that a state prosecutes when the fed choses not to do so.

A state wanting to prosecute Obama would have to have some jurisdiction. What Red State has jurisdiction over anything Obama does?
Click to expand...

you aren't really a lawyer, are you?

if obama is found to have broken a Texas law, would they not have that jurisdiction?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you aren't really a lawyer, are you?

if obama is found to have broken a Texas law, would they not have that jurisdiction?
Click to expand...

To break a Texas law you would be required to have some contact with Texas with a connection to the breaking of that law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top