San Francisco teacher sparks outrage with disturbing tweets

[QP!]

Who are you to decide for others who they love and who they can marry? What harm does it do to you if someone married a child?

PEDOPHILIA IS FINE AS LONG AS YOU SAY YOU LOVE THE CHILD YOU ARE FUCKING AND WANT TO MARRY THEM!



Can't make this shit up when it comes to derps.

 

[Yakuda]

PEDOPHILIA IS FINE AS LONG AS YOU SAY YOU LOVE THE CHILD YOU ARE FUCKING AND WANT TO MARRY THEM!



Can't make this shit up when it comes to derps.

You can squeal like the little bitch you are all you like but the questions remain, who the fuck are to to decide who someone can love and marry? And how are you hurt by their doing it?

 

[QP!]

You can squeal like the little bitch you are all you like but the questions remain, who the fuck are to to decide who someone can love and marry? And how are you hurt by their doing it?

I am not deciding who anyone can love and marry. What a stupid thing you are saying.

I can however recognize pedophilia and say 'even if you love and marry the person that does not change it being pedophilia'.

Lets be clear you are saying 'Pedophilia is fine with me as long as...'


And then you just finish that sentence with your reasoning.

 

[LV426]

sexual abuse victimcs often disassociate and come to believe their abuser is good.

All abuse victims do that, which is why you think Trump is good.

 

[LV426]

I am not deciding who anyone can love and marry. What a stupid thing you are saying.

I can however recognize pedophilia and say 'even if you love and marry the person that does not change it being pedophilia'.

Lets be clear you are saying 'Pedophilia is fine with me as long as...'

And then you just finish that sentence with your reasoning.

These are the same people who think it's perfectly OK for a 14 year old to get married and have kids.

 

[Yakuda]

I am not deciding who anyone can love and marry. What a stupid thing you are saying.

I can however recognize pedophilia and say 'even if you love and marry the person that does not change it being pedophilia'.

Lets be clear you are saying 'Pedophilia is fine with me as long as...'


And then you just finish that sentence with your reasoning.

I never NEVER said it was fine. Show where I did. I said who the duck are you to decide who someone loves and who they marry. And how does it harm you?

 

[QP!]

I never NEVER said it was fine. Show where I did. I said who the duck are you to decide who someone loves and who they marry. And how does it harm you?

Explain what this quote means by you?

...What harm does it do to you if someone married a child?

Seems pretty clear you defending adults marrying children, which is a defense of pedophilia. You are saying you are ok with pedophilia and will not judge them as long as .... ' __________'.


YOu have some reasons you fill in that blank that make pedophilia acceptable to you.

 

[Yakuda]

Explain what this quote means by you?




Seems pretty clear you defending adults marrying children, which is a defense of pedophilia. You are saying you are ok with pedophilia and will not judge them as long as .... ' __________'.


YOu have some reasons you fill in that blank that make pedophilia acceptable to you.

Are you really this retarded? I not defending anyone I'm asking what harm comes to you if someone else marries a child. the object of the question is you not the actions of others. So again who the fuck are you to decide who someone can love and who they can marry.

 

[QP!]

Are you really this retarded? I not defending anyone I'm asking what harm comes to you if someone else marries a child. the object of the question is you not the actions of others. So again who the fuck are you to decide who someone can love and who they can marry.

How can you keep asking such a stupid question.

If i say "I am against Drunk Driving and think it should be a crime', I am NOT deciding for anyone what they can or cannot do when it comes to drunk drive. THEY CAN, and THEY DO. and the law decides whether they should be prosecuted for it or not.


IF i say "I am against pedophilia" and think it should not be done and should be a crime, I am NOT deciding for anyone what they CAN or CANNOT DO. If someone still wants to be a pedophile they can.


So you would agree i have every right to be against Pedophilia, but what you are saying is 'as long as the pedophlie is in love with and eventually marries his victim no one should judge them'.

That last bit is your reason or logic on when you think pedophlia is ok and shoould not be judged. I do not agree with you and do not have to. I think pedophila is always wrong, and you saying 'but whatabout if the Pedophile does...', does not change my voiew.

I suspect you have many potentially reasons as to why you support pedophilia and I won't agree with any of them. What the pedophlie does or does not do, will NEVER justify the act for me, as it does for you.

 

[Yakuda]

How can you keep asking such a stupid question.

If i say "I am against Drunk Driving and think it should be a crime', I am NOT deciding for anyone what they can or cannot do when it comes to drunk drive. THEY CAN, and THEY DO. and the law decides whether they should be prosecuted for it or not.


IF i say "I am against pedophilia" and think it should not be done and should be a crime, I am NOT deciding for anyone what they CAN or CANNOT DO. If someone still wants to be a pedophile they can.


So you would agree i have every right to be against Pedophilia, but what you are saying is 'as long as the pedophlie is in love with and eventually marries his victim no one should judge them'.

That last bit is your reason or logic on when you think pedophlia is ok and shoould not be judged. I do not agree with you and do not have to. I think pedophila is always wrong, and you saying 'but whatabout if the Pedophile does...', does not change my voiew.

I suspect you have many potentially reasons as to why you support pedophilia and I won't agree with any of them. What the pedophlie does or does not do, will NEVER justify the act for me, as it does for you.

Again you want to decide who someone can love and also they can marry. You're a fucking hater. Just accept it Adolf.

 

[QP!]

Again you want to decide who someone can love and also they can marry. You're a fucking hater. Just accept it Adolf.

You stupidity knows no bounds. Congrats on that.

My position is simple. - I AM AGAINST PEDOPHILIA. Full stop.


Your position is also simple. - YOU ARE OK WITH PEDOPHILIA UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS WHERE YOU WOULD NOT JUDGE IT.

You are saying you have certain reasons where you do not think people should judge pedophilia as wrong to do, and on that we will not agree.

 

[Scott]

Let's stop right there for now. I believe the term sexual abuse, like rape, is a word that has become so politically charged and ambiguous that it's generally best to use alternatives if possible such as unlawful sexual interaction. For evidence to its ambiguousness, I'll quote wordnik.com:

**

[1] from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.

noun Criminal sexual activity, especially that involving a victim below the age of sexual consent or incapable of sexual consent.

[2] from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

noun Any sexual activity that is undesired by one participant but forced by another participant nonetheless.

[3] from WordNet 3.0 Copyright 2006 by Princeton University. All rights reserved.

noun a statutory offense that provides that it is a crime to knowingly cause another person to engage in an unwanted sexual act by force or threat
**

Source:
https://www.wordnik.com/words/sexual abuse

The astute observer will have noted a few things:

1- The first definition can lead one to believe that it is only sexual abuse if one of the participants is essentially not allowed to engage in sexual activity with someone else by law. No mention of desirability, threat or force is mentioned.

2- The second and third definitions could lead on to believe that it only involves sexual interactions that are undesired by one of the participants and is forced upon them.


For those who prefer Merriam Webster, their definitions are here:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/sexual abuse

Like the definitions quoted, they run into the same types of problems.



Often according to whom? At this point, I think we need studies rather than statements without supporting evidence. In post #5, I referenced a summary of a study that gets into how young males and females who have had sexual experiences with adults reported said experiences. Quoting from said article:

**
Importance of age difference

In minor-older sex, partner age difference mattered for girls but not boys. Boys reacted positively, equally so for minor-peer and minor-older sex (77 vs. 78% at the time). Girls involved with older persons reacted positively slightly more than a third of the time (35–36%), which was just over half as often as girls involved with peers for reactions at the time (61%). Adolescent (12+) girls sexually involved with adult males 5 to 7 years older, however, reacted no more negatively than when involved with peer-aged males.

Girls in younger age groups, going from 15–17 to 12–14 to under 12, progressively reacted more negatively and less positively. For boys, on the other hand, those in the adolescent range (12–14 and 15–17) reacted nearly the same, with only younger boys (under 12) showing more negative and less positive reactions.

Boys with adults reacted negatively at the time (9.8%) significantly less often than boys with older minors (28.6%). They also reacted positively at the time more often than boys with older minors (83.0% vs. 66.7%).
**

Source:
https://mirror.amapin.love/download/rind-2022-your-5-minute-guide/

Near the end of the article, the following statement is made that I think is rather important:

**
. No adult-adult comparison.
• The importance of surveying adult-adult reactions is demonstrated by the Kinsey samples. Unlike the minor- peer reactions in the present study (which were the same or superior to minor-adult reactions), these adult- adult reactions were the same or inferior to the minor-adult reactions.
**

this is settled law.

I was talking about the ambiguous meaning of sexual abuse and a large study that reported on the feelings of minors engaging in sexual interactions with others. At no point did I mention any law, so I'm really not sure what you're referring to.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I was talking about the ambiguous meaning of sexual abuse and a large study that reported on the feelings of minors engaging in sexual interactions with others. At no point did I mention any law, so I'm really not sure what you're referring to.

Like Pedo Don molesting little girls?

 

[Matt Dillon]

A San Francisco Bay area teacher went viral on Twitter last weekend after posting a lengthy thread arguing that sex between a child and an adult is not “intrinsically harmful.” Zara Degeneres, a self-described “pagan witch,” faced widespread condemnation from parents. According to her LinkedIn page, she specializes in “teaching sex-positive values to middle and high school students through sex education.

She argued that child-adult sex is only “inappropriate” because of outdated Christian morals. According to the “sex educator,” children are only harmed because of the guilt and shame imposed by “highly religious parents.” Degeneres said she believes that children are fully capable of consenting to sex with adults.



https://floridajolt.com/san-francis...g-tweets-in-support-of-inappropriate-conduct/


This is today's Lib teacher!

Q1:volsrock thread, is it racist?

A1: It's not today! It's a San Fran freakazoid being San Fran-ish.

 

[Scott]

Again you want to decide who someone can love and also they can marry. You're a fucking hater. Just accept it Adolf.

You stupidity knows no bounds. Congrats on that.

My position is simple. - I AM AGAINST PEDOPHILIA. Full stop.


Your position is also simple. - YOU ARE OK WITH PEDOPHILIA UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS WHERE YOU WOULD NOT JUDGE IT.

You are saying you have certain reasons where you do not think people should judge pedophilia as wrong to do, and on that we will not agree.

Based on what Yakuda has said in the past, I suspect that Yakuda's just yanking your chain. Near the start of the thread, I too took his words at face value, in post #7 to be precise.

His response in post #11, plus Express Lane's response in post #12, made me realize that he can be pretty sarcastic at times.

 

[Scott]

I was talking about the ambiguous meaning of sexual abuse and a large study that reported on the feelings of minors engaging in sexual interactions with others. At no point did I mention any law, so I'm really not sure what you're referring to.

Like Pedo Don molesting little girls?

No, the study was on what the minors themselves felt after their first sexual interaction, either with minors or adults. I've never been a fan of Trump. I strongly suspect that the allegations that he raped a 13 year old in 1994 are true. An article on that from 2019 here:

Trump Teen Rape Allegation Resurfaces, Ronan Farrow Claims National Enquirer Tried to Protect Him in New Book | newsweek.com

 

[Dutch Uncle]

No, the study was on what the minors themselves were felt after their first sexual interaction, either with minors or adults. I've never been a fan of Trump. I strongly suspect that the allegations that he raped a 13 year old in 1994 are true. An article on that from 2019 here:

Trump Teen Rape Allegation Resurfaces, Ronan Farrow Claims National Enquirer Tried to Protect Him in New Book | newsweek.com

Notice how many Trump fans are willing to let Pedo Don get away with raping girls. They talk about Biden but not a Trump. Why?

There is something definitely wrong with Dutch that he has to post "pedo" so much:

Cowards post callout threads then block the person being called out.

 

[Scott]

No, the study was on what the minors themselves felt after their first sexual interaction, either with minors or adults. I've never been a fan of Trump. I strongly suspect that the allegations that he raped a 13 year old in 1994 are true. An article on that from 2019 here:

Trump Teen Rape Allegation Resurfaces, Ronan Farrow Claims National Enquirer Tried to Protect Him in New Book | newsweek.com

Notice how many Trump fans are willing to let Pedo Don get away with raping girls. They talk about Biden but not a Trump. Why?

I don't know. It seems pretty clear to me that both of them are attracted to minors and have behaved innapropriately with several of them. A point in Biden's favour, though, I've never heard even a rumour that he's raped anyone, let alone a minor.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I have to be honest......I suspected this was from Babylon Bee when I saw her name was Degeneris......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I don't know. It seems pretty clear to me that both of them are attracted to minors and have behaved innapropriately with several of them. A point in Biden's favour, though, I've never heard even a rumour that he's raped anyone, let alone a minor.

lib'rul rumors of rape brought by Demmycrats against Republican candidates are a dime a dozen.......but amazingly, after the election is over these unnamed accusers evaporate.....