Look how these Stanford law school students treat a judge

Yakuda said:
Then explain why you said the two things were different? I'm talking about disruptive behavior in both cases. You would whine if someone disrupted a drag show. Deny it. I dare you.
Click to expand...

One is, presumably styled as a political discussion, the other is a performance on stage.
 
Jarod said:
Right, the video cuts that portion out. Why did they act the way they did?
Click to expand...

Because they are whiny leftist bitches who have been taught their feelings matter more than anything else. It's like asking me why pigs oink.
 
Yakuda said:
Because they are whiny leftist bitches who have been taught their feelings matter more than anything else. It's like asking me why pigs oink.
Click to expand...

See, you are judging without the facts. Were those people pissing on the Capitol whiny Trumpist bitches who have been taught their feelings matter more than anything else?
 
Jarod said:
See, you are judging without the facts. Were those people pissing on the Capitol whiny Trumpist bitches who have been taught their feelings matter more than anything else?
Click to expand...

So let me ask you, what would the judge have had to say to make you so "uncomfortable" that you had to disrupt the whole event? I can tell you that unless he was physically threatening me there is no reason to disrupt the event. They were trespassibg and are sufferning the consequences. Any of the whiny bitches in that room facing any consequences??
 
Yakuda said:
He thinks the retarded cow was "skillful"
Click to expand...

Well I'm not a fan of anyone using the r word .. that being said , I am confused that he sees her response as anything but unacceptable for an administrator... in no way was it "skillful"....
 
Last edited:
Toddler-Tantrum.jpg


Poor little snowflake.
 
TOP said:
Well I'm not a fan of anyone using the r word .. that being said , I am confused that he sees her response as anything but unacceptable for an administrator... in no way eas ot "skillful"....
Click to expand...

Sorry the r word makes you uncomfortable but something is intellectually wrong with peopme who think the way leftists think. They are significantly impaired and they are treated as functioning adults. They aren't. Look at the arguments put forth by then here. They actually think there is a justifiable reason to do what they did. And what is that reason? They were "uncomfortable". Really? So I'm uncomfortable about the price of chicken in the marmet can I disrupt their business? These people need to be called what they are and treated based on their behavior. Being polite doesn't work with leftists. They are like bullies they only understand a punch in the mouth.
 
TOP said:
So you agree that their behavior and the behavior of the dean was unacceptable?
Click to expand...

I do not know because I do not have enough data to make a comment on the behavior of the students. I think the Dean was acceptable, in fact skilled at making sure the "Judge" got a chance to speak.
 
Yakuda said:
So let me ask you, what would the judge have had to say to make you so "uncomfortable" that you had to disrupt the whole event? I can tell you that unless he was physically threatening me there is no reason to disrupt the event. They were trespassibg and are sufferning the consequences. Any of the whiny bitches in that room facing any consequences??
Click to expand...

Who was trespassing? If you would be submissive in almost any scenario, so be it, that does not make it the right thing for everyone.
 
Jarod said:
I now see what this issue likely was, I still do not know what he said or how he said it just prior to the objections from the students.

It appears that in his ruling that he went further than necessary to make the ruling and added unnecessary dicta insulting the request and the person who made the request. He was behaving as an activist judge.
Click to expand...
Do you mean he did his job?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top