The Biden administration on Wednesday took a crucial step toward approving a $8 billion ConocoPhillips oil drilling project on the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, drawing the anger of environmentalists who say the vast new fossil fuel development poses a dire threat to the climate.
The Bureau of Land Management issued an environmental analysis that says the government prefers a scaled-back version of the project, which is known as Willow. The assessment calls for curtailing the project to three drill sites from five, as well as reducing the proposed length of both gravel and ice roads, pipelines and the length of airstrips to support the drilling.
The analysis is the last regulatory hurdle before the federal government makes a final ruling on whether to approve the Willow project. If approved, it project would produce about 600 million barrels of oil over 30 years, with a peak of 180,000 barrels of crude oil a day.
Separately, Bureau of Land Management and White House officials are considering additional measures to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and environmental harm, such as delaying decisions on permits for one of the drill sites and planting trees, according to two people familiar with the discussions.
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story
The final decision could come within the next month. But, in concluding that limited drilling could occur on the land in Alaska’s North Slope, the Biden administration has already sent a strong signal that it is likely to give the project a green light, both supporters and opponents said.
The Department of the Interior issued a statement saying the agency still had “substantial concerns” about the Willow project, “including direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions and impacts to wildlife and Alaska Native subsistence.” The analysis notes that the agency might make final changes “that would be more environmentally protective” like delaying a ruling about permits to more than one drill site.
Image
The president stands at a microphone in front of a backdrop that features horizontal bands of bright green lights.
President Biden has pledged to cut United States emissions.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times
The report was greeted with relief by Alaskan lawmakers and ConocoPhillips executives, who wanted a more expansive area for drilling but were worried that President Biden, who has made tackling climate change a centerpiece of his agenda, would work to block the project entirely.
ConocoPhillips said in a statement that it welcomed the environmental analysis and said the alternative selected by the Bureau of Land Management provided “a viable path forward” for the Willow project.
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story
“We believe Willow will benefit local communities and enhance American energy security while producing oil in an environmentally and socially responsible manner,” Erec S. Isaacson, president of ConocoPhillips Alaska, said in a statement. He said the project had undergone five years of regulatory review and called on the administration to approve the plan “without delay.”
The Biden Administration’s Environmental Agenda
A New Target for Conservatives: Republicans in Congress voted to repeal a Department of Labor rule that allows retirement funds to consider climate change and other factors when choosing companies in which to invest. President Biden said he would veto any bill to overturn the rule.
Wind and Solar Projects: The energy transition promised by President Biden is facing a serious obstacle: America’s antiquated systems to connect new sources of electricity to homes and businesses.
Colorado River: The seven states that rely on the shrinking river for water have been unable to reach a deal on reductions. Now, the federal government may have to step in and make a difficult decision.
Alaska’s senators, Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, both Republicans, issued statements calling on the Biden administration to approve the project without additional restrictions beyond those outlined in alternative selected by the Bureau of Land Management.
“Thousands of good union jobs, and immense benefits that will be felt across Alaska and the nation, will hang in the balance until a positive final decision has been issued,” Ms. Murkowski said.
The option is the smallest footprint possible for the Willow project with a more limited impact on the immediate environment, but still allows the company access to the area’s vast petroleum reserves. In addition to the three drilling sites, the Bureau of Land Management’s preferred option calls for about 482 acres of gravel fill, more than 400 miles of ice roads and about 89 miles of pipelines.
The agency said the blueprint would reduce the proposed project’s footprint within the Teshekpuk Lake Special Area, a critical ecological area in the petroleum reserve that supports migratory birds and is a primary calving area and migration corridor for the Teshekpuk caribou herd.
Sign up for the Climate Forward newsletter Your must-read guide to the climate crisis. Get it with a Times subscription
Environmental activists said Mr. Biden was betraying his own climate change agenda. They noted that even reducing the number of drill sites would still allow the company to extract most of the area’s vast petroleum reserve, leading to 278 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions over the project’s 30-year lifetime, about the annual equivalent emissions of 66 new coal-fired power plants.
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story
Mr. Biden has pledged to cut United States emissions at least 50 percent below 2005 levels by the end of this decade in order to help avoid the worst consequences of global warming. He also made a promise on the campaign trail to end new federal leases for oil and gas development.
Environmental groups said they intend to work to oppose Willow despite the signal from the administration that the project will proceed.
“No other oil and gas project has greater potential to undermine the Biden administration’s climate goals,” said Karlin Itchoak, Alaska regional director for The Wilderness Society. “If this project were to move forward, it would result in the production and burning of at least 30 years of oil at a time when the world needs climate solutions and a transition to clean energy.”
Rosemary Ahtuangaruak, the mayor of Nuiqsut, an Inupiat community near the proposed Willow project, said late Tuesday evening that she was disappointed by the administration’s finding. She said delaying the approval of one or more drilling sites would only spread out the harm over time to her community of about 500 residents.
Image
Several large, boxy pieces of industrial equipment, painted blue-green, stands beside stacks of rusty pipe and other gear.
A Phillips Alaska drilling rig in Deadhorse, Alaska, in 2005.Credit...Ron Niebrugge/Alamy
Ms. Ahtuangaruak traveled to Washington recently to tell policymakers that the project encroaches on the habitat of the millions of migratory birds who use the area, as well as whales, polar bears and the more than 80,000 caribou that locals depend on for subsistence fishing and hunting. If Willow is approved, her community would be surrounded by oil and gas projects, she said.
“We have enough oil and gas development around us and enough areas that are already leased in this area that they could do work for a long time,” Ms. Ahtuangaruak said. “There’s no reason they have to go into this area. It’s about wanting to.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue reading the main story
Willow’s supporters, including Alaska’s congressional delegation, labor unions, building trade groups and some residents of the North Slope, say the project would bring much-needed crude to a market still seeking alternatives to Russian oil while bolstering America’s energy security, creating about 2,500 jobs and generating as much as $17 billion in revenue for the federal government.
A number of other Alaska Native tribal governments, organizations and corporations have voiced their support, including the Alaska Federation of Natives, Voice of the Arctic, Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope, Alaska Native Village Corporation Association, Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, and the cities of Wainwright, Atqasuk and Utqiagvik.
Image
A woman in a green winter jacket sits at a desk beside a cup of coffee.
Rosemary Ahtuangaruak, the mayor of Nuiqsut and an opponent of the Willow project. Credit...Joshua Partlow/The Washington Post, via Getty Images
“For the North Slope Inupiat, the Willow Project is a new opportunity to ensure our communities and our people have a viable future,” Nagruk Harcharek, president of the Voice of the Arctic Inupiat, a group representing Indigenous people in the region, wrote to lawmakers and members of the Biden administration.
ConocoPhillips has said it was hoping for a fast decision from the Biden administration that would allow construction to begin this winter. If spring sets in and warmer temperatures begin to melt the frozen roads, it could make it more difficult for crews to pass and construction would have to be shelved for another year.
Therein lies one of the Willow project’s ironies. Over the past 60 years, Alaska has warmed more than twice as fast as the rest of the United States and the region is expected to continue to warm by an average of 4 degrees Fahrenheit over the 30-year life of the Willow project, thawing the frozen Arctic tundra around the drilling rigs and shortening the winter season during which ice roads and bridges remain frozen.
The proposed solution: ConocoPhillips plans to eventually install “chillers” into the thawing permafrost to keep it solid enough to support the equipment to drill for oil — the burning of which will release carbon dioxide emissions that will worsen the ice melt.
Willow was initially approved by the Trump administration and the Biden administration later defended the approval in court. The project was then temporarily blocked by a judge who said that the prior administration’s environmental analysis was not sufficient and did not fully consider the potential harm to wildlife or the further impact on climate change......
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/01/climate/alaska-willow-oil-drilling-biden.html
========================================
So will Biden have Americans working and burning American oil. Or will Biden have Venezuelans working and Americans burning dirty Venezuelan oil.
