“Woke”

[Flash]

I accused you of lying because you refused to verify any of it, just like how you refuse to verify this discrimination your wife faces that apparently I will never know...not because of my ignorance but because you won't tell anyone.

That's why I think it's fake...you felt compelled to invoke it because you couldn't invoke anything empirical.

See how you lie or forget. Only 2 hours ago you invoked my wife and in this post you claim I invoked her:

[LV426]"Right, we know how you refuse to accept that institutional racism exists, even though your "wife" has "faced more than will ever know".

Then, you lie and never admit you were wrong. You do not debate issues or facts but try to make others look bad by lying, making up stuff they said, or switching from the real issue to get lost in trivia. Try to show some honesty and integrity and treat fellow humans with some respect and love.




3

 

[SmarterthanYou]

NO, attempting to shut down racism.

it is idiocy to attempt to shut down racism by labeling everyone of a certain color 'racist' from the get go.

 

[Jarod]

it is idiocy to attempt to shut down racism by labeling everyone of a certain color 'racist' from the get go.

Silly

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Silly

it should be, and it would be, if the leftists wouldn't continue insisting on it. No matter how often you push the lies, water is still wet.

 

[Jarod]

it should be, and it would be, if the leftists wouldn't continue insisting on it. No matter how often you push the lies, water is still wet.

It’s just not true, you fell for more Fox propaganda

 

[SmarterthanYou]

It’s just not true, you fell for more Fox propaganda

highly doubtful...hows your bliss these days?

 

[LV426]

Only 2 hours ago you invoked my wife and in this post you claim I invoked her:

Flash, that was me invoking YOUR invocation of your wife, whose discrimination you've yet to articulate.

 

[cawacko]

There is a difference between an upfront blatant racist and one who has some latent racist attitude or action that he hasn’t even realized yet or is trying to change.

It can be argued there is a difference but to the person on the receiving end does it really matter? We all know the obvious kind of racism; a non-black person using the N-word being at the top of the list.

Let's take something maybe slightly more subtle. People will argue single family zoning was racist at its founding because its intention was to keep poor (read: largely minority) people out of their neighborhoods. Anyone who claims to be woke would recognize that history and fight to change/eliminate single family zoning today. Yet even in some of the most progressive areas of the country people fight tooth and nail to keep their neighborhoods from changing and by leaving the single family zoning designation in place.

Is this latter form of racism acceptable? When the NFL puts 'End Racism' in the endzone during their games does this get included? It's easy to proclaim oneself to be woke or tell others to be woke but why do those same people then do things like the above?

 

[Yakuda]

It can be argued there is a difference but to the person on the receiving end does it really matter? We all know the obvious kind of racism; a non-black person using the N-word being at the top of the list.

Let's take something maybe slightly more subtle. People will argue single family zoning was racist at its founding because its intention was to keep poor (read: largely minority) people out of their neighborhoods. Anyone who claims to be woke would recognize that history and fight to change/eliminate single family zoning today. Yet even in some of the most progressive areas of the country people fight tooth and nail to keep their neighborhoods from changing and by leaving the single family zoning designation in place.

Is this latter form of racism acceptable? When the NFL puts 'End Racism' in the endzone during their games does this get included? It's easy to proclaim oneself to be woke or tell others to be woke but why do those same people then do things like the above?

You mention the intention of single family zoning was "argued" to be racist. How is that verified? Is the argument that blacks can't afford single family homes? Is that argument racist? I wonder if lebron would welcome rednecks moving in next door to him? Would it be racist if he didn't? Racism is difficult to identify. Maybe it's like beauty, in the eye of the beholder.

 

[Flash]

Flash, that was me invoking YOUR invocation of your wife, whose discrimination you've yet to articulate.

Nope. You are a liar and a phony.

The first mention of my wife was in post #93 at 1:07 p.m. on Monday in this post:

Originally Posted by Flash
To me "woke" has relatively little to do with race.

[LV426] Right, we know how you refuse to accept that institutional racism exists, even though your "wife" has "faced more than will ever know".

You invoke my wife and then lie and claim I was the first to mention her. You lie and then argue against your own lies. Why would I describe a personal situation when you said several times you do not believe personal examples.

You previously lied and told another poster I said my wife was Asian. When I caught you in that lie you blamed it on my lack of articulation. Since I never discussed her background I did not articulate anything that could be misunderstood.

Go ahead. Show us a previous post prior to #93 from this thread in which I invoked my wife. Your lies are always easy to destroy.

 

[LV426]

You claimed Trump was going to cancel the 2020 election and did not verify it.

NOPE.

I said he would "try to" cancel the election, and I even linked to that post.

You couldn't link to that post because you didn't do the work, nor did you even recollect what was said.

You're one of the most dishonest people on JPP and you always seem to have an excuse for it.

You did not say "try" and cancel it.

I sure as shit did, and I even linked to the post several times.

You saw that and ran away from that thread completely because you're a piece of shit and you'll ALWAYS be a piece of shit.

Here it is:

Oh, I still believe Trump and the GOP are going to try to cancel the election.

Whether they are successful really depends on how much benefit of the doubt you, personally, are willing to give them.

And then there's this, which completely and totally destroyed Flash's attempt to drag me down to his shitty level: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...rriage-or-birth-control&p=5181374#post5181374

 

[Flash]

NOPE.

I said he would "try to" cancel the election, and I even linked to that post.

You couldn't link to that post because you didn't do the work, nor did you even recollect what was said.

You're one of the most dishonest people on JPP and you always seem to have an excuse for it.

I sure as shit did, and I even linked to the post several times.

You saw that and ran away from that thread completely because you're a piece of shit and you'll ALWAYS be a piece of shit.

Here it is:

And then there's this, which completely and totally destroyed Flash's attempt to drag me down to his shitty level: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...rriage-or-birth-control&p=5181374#post5181374

And I also linked to the posts in which you said he would cancel the election without using the word "try" and your lame excuse was you said "try" first.

However, you were clearly talking about canceling the election prior to it occurring, not afterward. He made no effort to cancel the election beforehand.

As your evidence, you claimed he had already cancelled some of the primaries. When I pointed out he did not cancel any primaries but state law provides for the cancellation of primaries when there is no competition you swore I was wrong and didn't know what I was talking about.

For once you did some research and admitted I was correct.

 

[LV426]

Nope. You are a liar and a phony.

Stop stealing my lines unless you're gonna pay me royalties.

Way back, you invoked your wife in the discussion about institutional racism, which you said doesn't exist, and the evidence you presented was the anecdotal "discrimination" your "wife" faced, which was "more than [I'll] ever know".

I guess that is literally the case because you won't share any details.

So you made a claim about your wife in an attempt to undermine the argument about institutional racism, but you didn't bother to verify the claim and any attempts to get specifics about the claim result in you hiding and stalling.

So what conclusion am I supposed to draw from that?

 

[LV426]

You invoke my wife and then lie and claim I was the first to mention her.

You were the first to mention her, WAAAAAAAY back on that thread about institutional racism...every attempt you made to discredit it failed, which is why your temper got the better of you and you blurted out that your wife would know more about discrimination than I ever would...and then you didn't elaborate further.

So the only reason your wife was dragged into this was because YOU DRAGGED HER IN when you were trying to disprove the existence of Institutional Racism.

But without telling us what kind of discrimination she faced, we are left to guess because you won't provide any more detail...so basically, you're asking everyone to take your word for it.

Why should they?

 

[LV426]

And I also linked to the posts in which you said he would cancel the election without using the word "try" and your lame excuse was you said "try" first.

So you scream about context all the fucking time, but when context doesn't work out in your favor, suddenly it must be dismissed.

Is time linear?

 

[LV426]

However, you were clearly talking about canceling the election prior to it occurring, not afterward.

I don't know how much clearer this could be:

Oh, I still believe Trump and the GOP are going to try to cancel the election.

Whether they are successful really depends on how much benefit of the doubt you, personally, are willing to give them.

I know you saw this post, too, and at the time you didn't seem to think it was what you're trying to say it now is.

 

[LV426]

As your evidence, you claimed he had already cancelled some of the primaries.

I didn't claim that, that actually happened.

He made no effort to cancel the election beforehand.

Of course he did!

Trump floats delaying election despite lack of authority to do so
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/30/politics/trump-delay-election-no-authority/index.html

When I pointed out he did not cancel any primaries but state law provides for the cancellation of primaries

Right, but who is the one actually canceling the primary? Is it the state, or the party?

 

[LV426]

And I also linked to the posts in which you said he would cancel the election without using the word "try" and your lame excuse was you said "try" first.

However, you were clearly talking about canceling the election prior to it occurring, not afterward. He made no effort to cancel the election beforehand.

As your evidence, you claimed he had already cancelled some of the primaries. When I pointed out he did not cancel any primaries but state law provides for the cancellation of primaries when there is no competition you swore I was wrong and didn't know what I was talking about.

For once you did some research and admitted I was correct.

Also, the whole "I won't share personal details of my anecdotes because you'll use them against me later on", is some serious consciousness of guilt right there.

 

[moon]

I don't know how much clearer this could be:



I know you saw this post, too, and at the time you didn't seem to think it was what you're trying to say it now is.

I didn't claim that, that actually happened.




Of course he did!

Trump floats delaying election despite lack of authority to do so
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/30/politics/trump-delay-election-no-authority/index.html




Right, but who is the one actually canceling the primary? Is it the state, or the party?

Also, the whole "I won't share personal details of my anecdotes because you'll use them against me later on", is some serious consciousness of guilt right there.

Your avalanches of shit impress nobody.

What we need here is a posse to run you out of Forumtown on a pole.

 

[Yakuda]

Your avalanches of shit impress nobody.

What we need here is a posse to run you out of Forumtown on a pole.

Avalanches of shit is a good phrase as I sometimes get as many as 7or 8 replies to just one of my posts from that wing nut. That one is REALLY unhinged.