The Art of Ignoring the 800lb Gorilla

ice dancer, I am sorry I called you a dipshit. You didn't get personal with me so I wont get personal with you. I take it back

Well, you know what they say asshole....once spoken can't be undone...OH, did I call you an asshole??? I'm sorry you got personal and I just reacted...:cof1:
 
and for the record, no one has to project anything regarding what dixie says. Dixie usually makes a fool of himself easily on his own.

Ice dancer, he doesn't believe 1/3rd exists. No, we are not taking anything out of context. You can ask him yourself.

You are completely out of context. I never have said that 1/3 doesn't exist, that is stupid... so stupid it doesn't deserve response. I have said on many occasions, and apparently, much to the amazement of pinheads, that 1 can't be divided evenly by 3, and to the best of my knowledge, this simple division problem still produces a remainder. So you can continue claiming I have said something else, as Ice Dancer said, all you can do is PROJECT something into what I say, and refute that. Mentally vacant assholes!
 
yup dixie, good job. I agree.

Lets just get it out in the open, muslims are backwards thinking inferiors.


I am not making that generalization, and I disagree with it because it is a generalization. Let's just get out in the open that radical Muslims are at war with us, and when a radical Muslim attacks and kills innocent Americans, it is indeed an act of war against us. There is no need to sugar coat it, or to avoid the obvious... it's an 800 lb gorilla in the room, let's not be afraid to acknowledge him.

To be honest, I firmly believe the restraints on mentioning his name, admitting this was a terrorist attack, and facing the 800 lb gorilla, is a direct reflection of this administration and their politically correct attempt to deflect any possible criticism directed at them. Let's not mention he is Muslim and this was a terror attack, it might make Obama look bad... like he wasn't on the ball... asleep at the switch.... you know, all the shit you threw at GWB after 9/11. Problem is, America ain't stupid! We know terrorism when we see it, don't piss up our leg and tell us it's raining.
 
Actually, he's off target as usual. Dixie doesn't listen to alternative news media unless it's capsulized by the denizens of ABC Talk Radio or in the WND. Had he done such, he would would have noticed that they were one step ahead of the MSM in getting the details. Hasan was conflicted about his faith to the point were he was being reported on by his fellow officers in 2007. Essentially, the system that should have tagged and removed this guy from active duty failed. Hasan had made numerous statements regarding his reluctance to go to Iraq, and had even had legal representation on that issue. All the evidence indicates that this guy had more personal issues than allegiance to a cause.

he broke over the though of u s of a muslims killing other muslims

yet, he overlooked the number of muslims killing other muslims around the world in terrorist acts
 
No it isn't. He specifically tied "radical islamic beliefs" to what he said. He also indicated that the trouble with the story of Ft Hood is the ridiculous commentary that ignores this fact.

The trouble you and others have with much of what Dixie posts is that you project all kinds of BS into what he actually says. Disagree with what he actually says not with what you project he says.

Not in the beginning, though. When news of the incident first broke, all that mattered was that he had a Muslim affiliation; that was it.
 
Normally I would expect some flak for the "muslims are inferior comment." But whenever I do my "christians are retards" speech I get a bunch of pats on the back and "lol go grind!"

I think all religious people are backwards inferiors, a detriment to our society, and that we would all be better off without such wastes of sperm and eggs.

It never lets me give you rep for what you say. But this is fucking awesome.
 
This past week, I have seen these boards and the mainstream news, constantly trying to downplay the incident at Ft. Hood. We were told, almost immediately, this was not an act of terrorism. We have been lectured for a week about how this doesn't reflect on the Islamic religion or all Muslims. TV journalists were initially hesitant to even mention Maj. Hussan's name, because "it could be problematic", one anchor said.

It seems we are now walking around on eggshells, trying to ignore the 800 lb gorilla in the room. Pretending Hussan's religious background and ties to radical Islamic beliefs, had nothing to do with what he did, and persecuting anyone who dares to acknowledge the 800 lb gorilla. The man was screaming "allah akbar" as he murdered US soldiers in cold blood. If that isn't terrorism, we need to sit down and have a fundamental debate over what constitutes terrorism, because apparently, some people just don't get it.

Now, if Maj. Hussan were listening to Rush, and looked like Tim McVeigh, I am certain the left would already have him convicted of domestic terrorism, and would be pushing to have right-wing talk radio banned, to protect us from future terror attacks like this. If Bush had waffled around on his war strategy in either Iraq or Afghanistan, and something like this happened on his watch, the left would certainly blame him, and immediately debunk the claims of how Bush had kept us safe for 8 years.

It must take a lot of effort to continue to ignore the gorilla.

Who said this was not an act of terrorism?
 
So explain this to me...The President's first reaction to the Henry Gates' arrest was, "I don't know all the facts." and then, "the Cambridge police acted stupidly..."

His first reaction to the shooting at Ft. Hood was, "We don't yet know all the details at this moment." and then "We don't know all the answers yet and I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we know all the facts,"

In both instances, the President readily admits that all of the facts are not known. In the case of his friend, Professor Gates, he afforded himself the luxury of jumping to a conclusion, but in the case of our friends at Ft. Hood, we are not to be allowed the same luxury. Why?

Just curious...



Looks like the president learned from the gates incident.
 
You are completely out of context. I never have said that 1/3 doesn't exist, that is stupid... so stupid it doesn't deserve response. I have said on many occasions, and apparently, much to the amazement of pinheads, that 1 can't be divided evenly by 3, and to the best of my knowledge, this simple division problem still produces a remainder. So you can continue claiming I have said something else, as Ice Dancer said, all you can do is PROJECT something into what I say, and refute that. Mentally vacant assholes!

So 1/3 + 1/3 +1/3 = ?????
 
This past week, I have seen these boards and the mainstream news, constantly trying to downplay the incident at Ft. Hood. We were told, almost immediately, this was not an act of terrorism. We have been lectured for a week about how this doesn't reflect on the Islamic religion or all Muslims. TV journalists were initially hesitant to even mention Maj. Hussan's name, because "it could be problematic", one anchor said.

It seems we are now walking around on eggshells, trying to ignore the 800 lb gorilla in the room. Pretending Hussan's religious background and ties to radical Islamic beliefs, had nothing to do with what he did, and persecuting anyone who dares to acknowledge the 800 lb gorilla. The man was screaming "allah akbar" as he murdered US soldiers in cold blood. If that isn't terrorism, we need to sit down and have a fundamental debate over what constitutes terrorism, because apparently, some people just don't get it.

Now, if Maj. Hussan were listening to Rush, and looked like Tim McVeigh, I am certain the left would already have him convicted of domestic terrorism, and would be pushing to have right-wing talk radio banned, to protect us from future terror attacks like this. If Bush had waffled around on his war strategy in either Iraq or Afghanistan, and something like this happened on his watch, the left would certainly blame him, and immediately debunk the claims of how Bush had kept us safe for 8 years.

It must take a lot of effort to continue to ignore the gorilla.
If they admit it is terrorism, they have to admit it happened on Obama's "watch" and people will expect him to actually do something about it.
 
If they admit it is terrorism, they have to admit it happened on Obama's "watch" and people will expect him to actually do something about it.


Let's concede for the sake of argument that this is "terrorism," what do you want Obama to do about it?
 
If they admit it is terrorism, they have to admit it happened on Obama's "watch" and people will expect him to actually do something about it.

This is silly, it was not an organized attack.

What did Bush do about the Anthrax attacks? Were they terrorism?

Depending on your defination of terrorism this was the act of an insane wannabe terrorist.

If it was "terrorism" what are you going to do? Was what Timothy McVeigh did "terrorism"? Did the public demand President Clinton "do" something?

Come on Damo, your posts are usually more intelegent than that!
 
BTW, who has denied it was terrorism? Dixie claims everyone is saying it was not terrorism? Who?
 
This is silly, it was not an organized attack.

What did Bush do about the Anthrax attacks? Were they terrorism?

Depending on your defination of terrorism this was the act of an insane wannabe terrorist.

If it was "terrorism" what are you going to do? Was what Timothy McVeigh did "terrorism"? Did the public demand President Clinton "do" something?

Come on Damo, your posts are usually more intelegent than that!
Right, because lone suicidal gunmen couldn't possibly be proceeding with Jihad like a lone suicidal bomber...

Inane.

And the reality is we were not at war in two theaters based on a terrorist attack from McVeigh and Company at that time.

We learned, or should have, from Clinton that treating this as a "crime" only let people plan and implement truly horrific acts. People would expect him to act, and a bit more than trying to tell everybody that it is unimportant that the gentleman was practicing the art of Jihad all by himself with nothing else that could possibly have attributed to that act.
 
Actually, pathetic is simply posting this after any post you disagree with me on.

Clearly, others had the same reaction. Your post was a loser response, and not well thought out at all.

Now, I have no doubt that you'll try to defend it for a few pages here, but trust me - it was pathetic.
 
Back
Top