Future of social media is infront of the SCOTUS this week

Both of the cases you posted are irrelevant, both 30years old, and were used at the time to create 230, not what the Court has facing them this week


Try to keep up “big chiwawa”

Of course they are relevant. They illustrate the difference between a distributor and a publisher.
 
Of course they are relevant. They illustrate the difference between a distributor and a publisher.

If they were relevant the Court wouldn’t be deciding on the two cases this week

As I explained, they are thirty year old cases used when 230 was instituted, when social media was in its infancy, and if they throw it out, it won’t matter what you are, the sites will be vulnerable to legal action on whatever they run
 
If they were relevant the Court wouldn’t be deciding on the two cases this week

As I explained, they are thirty year old cases used when 230 was instituted, when social media was in its infancy, and if they throw it out, it won’t matter what you are, the sites will be vulnerable to legal action on whatever they run

Now the internet mega corps are claiming a "distributor" defense. The fact that they are also "publishers" is bound to come up. Can they really be both?
 
Not at all, the “big chiwawa” was citing cases from thirty years ago which created 230, irrelevant to the exchange

Right they created it. Fact remains if you decide what you will show people that's a choice. You are responsible for that chose. Period. Tell me why that's a difficult concept for you to accept.
 
Back
Top