California cities rattled by prostitution, human trafficking in broad daylight as cop

E

Earl

Well-known member
California cities rattled by prostitution, human trafficking in broad daylight as cops pin blame on new law

https://www.foxnews.com/us/californ...ficking-broad-daylight-cops-pin-blame-new-law

A road in the heart of San Francisco’s Mission District has become lined with prostitutes and pimps, prompting city officials to install barricades as residents sound off that not only do they feel less safe – especially at night – but that they are worried about the women working the streets.

"From the window right there, I’ll see three [people] ganging up on a girl," one San Francisco resident told the Chronicle while pointing toward a bay window that overlooks an intersection. "They’ll be hitting her."

"I call the cops; no one comes. There’s nothing I can do," the unidentified woman said.

The issue isn’t isolated to just San Francisco, with other major cities such as Los Angeles and Oakland reporting the same.
...
Police departments and Republican leaders in the state are pinning blame for the overt prostitution on a new law that went into effect on Jan. 1. Senate Bill 357 repealed a previous law that banned loitering with the intent to engage in prostitution.
This supposedly well-intentioned law benefits pimps and other sex-traffickers and harms the trafficked - including trafficked minors - by forbidding police scrutiny that could detect trafficked women and girls. Whether Wiener's intentions really were "good" is a valid question ... perhaps the consequence to the trafficked was intended.
 
"From the window right there, I’ll see three [people] ganging up on a girl," one San Francisco resident told the Chronicle while pointing toward a bay window that overlooks an intersection. "They’ll be hitting her."

"I call the cops; no one comes. There’s nothing I can do," the unidentified woman said.

The issue isn’t isolated to just San Francisco, with other major cities such as Los Angeles and Oakland reporting the same.
...
 
Earl said:
Whether Wiener's intentions really were "good" is a valid question ... perhaps the consequence to the trafficked was intended.
Click to expand...

Of course it was intended.
They openly side with violent criminals now.
Why not the rest of the criminals?
 
EARL,



You're right that the extreme Left (Democrats) have destroyed California; and the damage is now irreparable.



The instrument of desruction they used was mass-immigration from South of the border - i.e; encouraging the illegal immigration of Hispanics from Mexico.



It happened like this....



In 1994, the Governor of California was a Republican called Pete Wilson.



Illegal immigration was already costing the state a fortune, and White Californians weren't happy with the large number of illegals pouring in from Mexico for a number of reasons.



There was a gunerbernatorial election in 1994 and a measure called "Proposition 187" was placed on the election ballot.



"Proposition 187 "stated hat any illegal immigrants in California would be prohibited from receiving ANY state benefits in the form of schooling, health - care, public housing or any other social/Welfare benefits of any kind.



Prop 187 was extremely controversial as it targeted a racial group (Hispanics) and their were a series of large, raucous, street demonstrations , etc; before polling day.



Despite this racial unrest, Wilson was re-elected as Governor with an emphatic majority. In addition, Proposition was passed with a clear majority (61%)
.


Two days later, however, belligerent Immigrant groups and Democrat lawyers filed a law suit against Proposition 187. To cut a long story short the law suit against Prop 187 fell into the hands of lefist Judges who held up the implementation of 187 indefinitely (a neat example example of outrageous, left-leaning Judicial activism in America that has grown even worse over the years to date) Proposition 187 was never implemented, and in 1999 it was effectively was effectively terminated by a leftist-liberal Appeals Court Judge.




Immediately after Prop 187 was held up in Court - just itwo days after Pete Wilson's re-election - a furious, anti-Republican political "blow-Back" began to gather momentum in California. Immigrant Hispanics and Latinos (legal and illegal) viewed "Proposition 187" as racist measure. This was music to the ears of California's Democrats and when Pete Wilson's second term expired, the gubernational election to select a new Governor of Californornia put the Democrats in power. It was hardly surprising given the red-hot back-lash generated by the Republican Party's unified support for Pete Wilson's Prop 187 ballot measure in 1994 The Democrats exploited this in their 'election campaign which promised Hispanics/latino voters that immigration laws would be relaxed (to put it mildly) and migrants (wink, wink, nudge,nudge: UNDOCUMENTED immigrants to Californiia) would be fully entitled to generous state benefits and services and so on.



The Democrats regained control of the state after Wilson's second term expired and they promptly opened the floodgates to illegal immigration from Mexico into California. They also set about established the first "Sanctuary Cities" in the US. In sum, California was over-run with illegal Mexicans/Latinos.



It turned out that they would cost the state billions in Welfare revenue. I forget exactly what the yearly bill for state government services/benefits provided to illegal Hispanic/latino immigrans is in California today, but I know that it's astronomical.



The Republican Party is unelectable in California today in large part due to the lingering bitter resentment of Mexicans and Latinos in the state who have never forgotten nor forgiven them for the racist attempt to implement Prop 187 back in 1994.



That's ONE reason that the Democrats currently have a "Super-Majority" in the State Assembly in Sacramento today. And it is also why the Democrats have managed to control the state for decades while implementing a broad range of insane socialist/progressive policies. They are pandering to their base (who hate the racist-"Prop 187" Republicans with a passion - i.e. the population of low-IQ, Welfare-dependent non-English - speaking, uneducated and unskilled Mexican peasants who now constitute something like 45% of the state's population.




Dachshund - the Wonder Hound

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!


This - i.e; unfettered illegal immigration that has been ongoing for decades, is one of the main reasons that California is now - as Trump would say - a s**t-hole, (a failed American state)


...
Click to expand...
 
Shocker, Murdoch has another crime is rampant narrative, rampant in Blue States of course, when is the last time Fox ever did a report on what are actually America's most crime ridden States?

"10 Most Dangerous States in the US: 2023"
Alaska
New Mexico
Tennessee
Arkansas
Arizona
Louisiana
Missouri
South Carolina
South Dakota
(https://propertyclub.nyc/article/most-dangerous-states-in-the-us)
(https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/crime-rate-by-state)
(https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...n-america-violent-crime-murder-rate/40968963/)
(https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-have-the-least-and-most-crime/)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top