Lowest unemployment since the moon landing.

so what goal post are you moving now?

Not a single one because my "claim" is that spending was cut in some areas but increased in others.

The link proves that.

So I'm still waiting for any kind of evidence that indicates cutting taxes leads to increased savings.
 
you claimed education spending was down. it was not.

It was down in the original metric you used...and then when you realized that, you shifted your goalposts to gross dollars and tried to get me outraged at those.

But I don't care about gross dollars, and neither should you since they have nothing to do with your dogma.
 
you are dismissed. I am not going to waste time on looking into more of your nonsense when you are a proven liar in this very thread.

Again, you running away from your dissonance is a dismissal but it's not the kind of dismissal you think.

The message you're sending isn't that you've won anything, it's that you've lost quite a lot and your ego is suffering from it.

So you "dismiss" it in order to avoid it.
 
It was down in the original metric you used...and then when you realized that, you shifted your goalposts to gross dollars and tried to get me outraged at those.

But I don't care about gross dollars, and neither should you since they have nothing to do with your dogma.

dollars are what we are discussing - inflation adjusted dollars. you said it went down.
 
ou did not say we are spending less in relation to GDP on education. You simply said education spending is down.

I never said that either.

What I said was that tax cuts are almost always made up for with cuts to social spending...and you helped me make that argument by posting the %-to-GDP for education spending.

Only after you realized you got it backwards did you suddenly start caring about gross dollars.
 
Again, you running away from your dissonance is a dismissal but it's not the kind of dismissal you think.

The message you're sending isn't that you've won anything, it's that you've lost quite a lot and your ego is suffering from it.

So you "dismiss" it in order to avoid it.

I am not running away from a thing. I just find you to be a bore and a waste of time

I reply so others see through your bullshit

In the mid 1950s education spending began a rapid increase, from a low of 2.6 percent in 1953. Education spending peaked at 5.7 percent in 1976

In 2022 education spending was 7.1 percent GDP.


you are lying again.

Remember my link - stop looking at pretty pictures and read!

https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/education_spending
 
I never said that either.

What I said was that tax cuts are almost always made up for with cuts to social spending...and you helped me make that argument by posting the %-to-GDP for education spending.

Only after you realized you got it backwards did you suddenly start caring about gross dollars.

spending is up. we are not cutting spending . that is a lie
 
those are two sets of activities

So now you're going to argue that they're mutually exclusive????

How can that be the case when you just got done saying earlier that "letting you keep more of what you earned" will affect the personal savings rate???

Or are you now going to say that the personal savings rate has nothing to do with the tax rates??? If that's the case, then why are you even making an argument for tax cuts? You have nothing to show for them!

You're really bad at this.

You create all these conflicts within your own argument for no good reason...
 
How much money did I keep out of my paycheck? when taxes are cut, my take home pay goes up. So I am right. it is an axiom x+y > x when y>0.

The economy is more than just you, you know.

You keep pushing your dogma out here but the problem is that the data doesn't support you.

So until you can get the data to support your argument that cutting taxes increases personal savings, you're going to keep making arguments that are easily beaten back by invoking the data you shared.

Do you realize that?
 
So now you're going to argue that they're mutually exclusive????

How can that be the case when you just got done saying earlier that "letting you keep more of what you earned" will affect the personal savings rate???

I did not say that.

I said I will take home more money if you cut taxes.

it is axiomatic moron :laugh:


me said:
when people are feeling the pinch, tax cuts are well received.


Allowing me to keep more of my money does not increase my or anyones personal debt.

for my savings to deplete, it is not because I took more money home, it is because I spent more then I took home. quite simple for a non-retard Those are two seperate activiies.

earnings and spending. and they are not joined at the hip
 
Last edited:
How much money people save is based on other factors as well

So there's no path to seeing how tax cuts fit in here.

They don't incentivize anyone, you just confirmed it here.

So you think tax cuts are an incentive to save but you won't explain how.


Such as the incentive to save, vs the incentive to spend.

What incentives are you talking about?

You do this all the time...you speak very vaguely and generally and then whenever anyone attempts to clarify, you get touchy, shrill, and defensive.

"incentives"...jesus fucking christ.

You're looking for incentives but you're ignoring the data.

Turns out that when you "give people more of what they earned", those people end up in debt.
 
What is not true is your claim that we are spending less on education, and that is why people don't save. that was retarded, and I debunked it.

It's YOUR CLAIM that we are spending less on education because you provided data that showed exactly that!

I didn't bring any of that up, YOU DID.

You ran your big mouth and now that you put your foot in it, are trying to change the parameters of what you meant after the fact.

Had you been accurate from the beginning, this conversation would probably go a different way.

But you have this compulsion that you can't control, so you have to spend all your time convincing yourself that you're "winning".
 
you lost.

You proved gross spending on education grew, but you also proved that education spending as a percentage of GDP declined.


sorry you are retarded and losses to you feel like wins.

I can always tell when one of my attacks really hits home because you all start using them against me.

But the problem is that you're not very original by doing that, and it speaks to your inability to confront the things about your personal beliefs that result in dissonance.
 
In the mid 1950s education spending began a rapid increase, from a low of 2.6 percent in 1953. Education spending peaked at 5.7 percent in 1976

OMFG...that is what I've been saying this entire time that you have been disagreeing with because you take things so personally on JPP.

It didn't take that long for you to eventually take the position you were arguing against.

You're all backwards and confused...I am convinced you don't even know what you're saying anymore.

You're just reacting to things I post because you can't form any kind of argument since you have nothing to support it.


In 2022 education spending was 7.1 percent GDP.

What is education spending for 2023? And what was education spending for 2021?

So you're magnifying a one time boost that is surrounded on both sides by lower numbers.

This is what you have been reduced to now.
 
Back
Top