Covid booster cuts risk of infection by half

[Into the Night]

Never saw it. Please name them if you aren't lying.

Lie. You even commented on it!

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Why? They're my friends.
i guess that's a foreign concept for you.

Of course they are.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Lie. You even commented on it!

You don't know, do ya, Sybil? LOL

 

[Walt]

It is not 'too complex'.

It CAUSES Covid19.

It is not a vaccine.

A spike protein is one part of a Covid19 virus. It is much more complex to build the entire Covid19 virus. But even if you were correct, and it did give you the entire Covid19 virus somehow, that would make it a vaccine, not a treatment.

 

[Walt]

We know EXACTLY how Malaria was eradicated - DDT.

No, Malaria was eradicated in the USA before DDT, and has remained eradicated after DDT. DDT has never eradicated malaria anywhere. DDT is a small area killer of mosquitos, so cannot eradicate malaria.

Malaria was eradicated through water control. It is a solution that requires the government to control what happens on private property. There cannot be sitting puddles of water on private property at certain times of year. That requires regulations and inspectors.

The problem here is the alt right does not know how things work, and do not like how things work.

 

[Into the Night]

A spike protein is one part of a Covid19 virus. It is much more complex to build the entire Covid19 virus. But even if you were correct, and it did give you the entire Covid19 virus somehow, that would make it a vaccine, not a treatment.

Apparently you don't know what 'vaccine' means either. Too bad you never learned the language.

 

[Into the Night]

No, Malaria was eradicated in the USA before DDT, and has remained eradicated after DDT.

It was never eradicated. However, I will call this argument 1.

DDT has never eradicated malaria anywhere.

I will call this argument 2. You are now locked in another paradox.

DDT is very effective against areas with malaria problem, since it kills the mosquitoes that carry this disease. It can be used over a wide area, is cheap, and properly applied, is nontoxic to humans and animals.

DDT is a small area killer of mosquitos, so cannot eradicate malaria.

Argument 2.

Malaria was eradicated through water control.

Argument 1.

It is a solution that requires the government to control what happens on private property. There cannot be sitting puddles of water on private property at certain times of year. That requires regulations and inspectors.

Not possible.

The problem here is the alt right does not know how things work, and do not like how things work.

Hey...it's YOUR paradox. YOU are the one making it. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox. It's irrational.

 

[Walt]

It was never eradicated.

We used to expect 1% of cities like Washington or New Orleans to die every year from Malaria... When was the last time you heard of anyone even getting Malaria in the USA?

DDT is very effective against areas with malaria problem, since it kills the mosquitoes that carry this disease. It can be used over a wide area, is cheap, and properly applied, is nontoxic to humans and animals.

The lack of logic in your statement is amazing. If it is nontoxic to animals, how does it kill mosquitoes(an animal)? How were we able to defeat Malaria in the USA, before DDT? Why have we continued to defeat Malaria after DDT?

DDT is somewhat effective in small areas surrounded by Malaria mosquitoes, but only in reduction. You are not going to get the great results that you would get from water control. DDT will make things actually worse if sprayed over large areas, because it drives the mosquitos towards the humans.

 

[Into the Night]

We used to expect 1% of cities like Washington or New Orleans to die every year from Malaria... When was the last time you heard of anyone even getting Malaria in the USA?

About 2000 cases occur in the States each year. Source: CDC

The lack of logic in your statement is amazing. If it is nontoxic to animals, how does it kill mosquitoes(an animal)?

Divisional error fallacy.

How were we able to defeat Malaria in the USA, before DDT?

It has not been defeated.

Why have we continued to defeat Malaria after DDT?

It has not been defeated. DDT is still used in many parts of the world.

DDT is somewhat effective in small areas surrounded by Malaria mosquitoes, but only in reduction. You are not going to get the great results that you would get from water control. DDT will make things actually worse if sprayed over large areas, because it drives the mosquitos towards the humans.

It does not drive mosquitoes anywhere. Dead mosquitoes don't fly.

You are still locked in paradox. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox. It is irrational. The only way to clear a paradox is to choose ONE of the conflicting arguments and utterly discard the other.

 

[Walt]

About 2000 cases occur in the States each year. Source: CDC

Almost all those cases are people who get Malaria somewhere else, and return to the USA with it. Local transmission is rare, and a local outbreak has not happened in a while.

If Republicans get their way, we might be able to sustain local outbreaks again, but it is not happening right now.

 

[Into the Night]

Almost all those cases are people who get Malaria somewhere else, and return to the USA with it.

Lie. Besides, the US is not the world.

Local transmission is rare, and a local outbreak has not happened in a while.

Lie.

If Republicans get their way, we might be able to sustain local outbreaks again, but it is not happening right now.

Try English. It works better.

You are still locked in paradox. You are still being irrational.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Your socks are Into the Night, IBDaMann and gfm7175.

Who are my socks, Sybil?

What evidence do you have that any of those are "sock" accounts?

I see that sock accounts are allowed here - actually doesn't look there are any rules at all on this board.

I have no sock accounts, barely have time to post using this one.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

What evidence do you have that any of those are "sock" accounts?

I see that sock accounts are allowed here - actually doesn't look there are any rules at all on this board.

I have no sock accounts, barely have time to post using this one.

The manifesto linked in their signatures.

There are rules. You agreed to have read and abide by them when you registered.

If you say so.

 

[Uncensored2008]

No, Malaria was eradicated in the USA before DDT,

False.

Progress had been made in combating malaria, but the eradication was a result of DDT and the mosquito that spread it. But Rachel Carson took care of that. I wonder if she is ultimately responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler?

and has remained eradicated after DDT. DDT has never eradicated malaria anywhere. DDT is a small area killer of mosquitos, so cannot eradicate malaria.

That is just ignorant. Are you a democrat?

https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/malaria

Malaria was eradicated through water control.

You think WATER spreads malaria? LMAO

No, mosquitoes spread malaria.

Killing mosquitoes is the key to containing the disease. The problem is killing the mosquitoes without killing people and livestock that consume the same water.

That's where DDT came in - it's harmless to people and other mammals.

Carson claimed - on dubious evidence, that it softened the shells of raptors - almost humorous given the way the eco-wackos chop them up in wind farms.

It is a solution that requires the government to control what happens on private property. There cannot be sitting puddles of water on private property at certain times of year. That requires regulations and inspectors.

The problem here is the alt right does not know how things work, and do not like how things work.

Government is the solution to every problem for the left. DDT is far more effective.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The manifesto linked in their signatures.

There are rules. You agreed to have read and abide by them when you registered.

If you say so.

There were rules in 2018.

You abide by none of those rules. Doesn't bother me - I kind of like the free for all here.

 

[gfm7175]

I have been vaxxed and boosted twice, and I have never, ever had COVID.

almost just like me, except I was vaxxed and boosted twice and I have had Covid......

And here I am, unjabbed (thus unboosted) and I have never ever had COVID.

 

[zymurgy]

And here I am, unjabbed (thus unboosted) and I have never ever had COVID.

I have been jabbed and boosted twice and had covid twice

first time I lost smell - but was hardly sick

second time I felt like it was a bad cold, but did not lose smell.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

There were rules in 2018.

You abide by none of those rules. Doesn't bother me - I kind of like the free for all here.

I came here in 2020.

I abide by the rules and like to point them out to people like you.

 

[Yakuda]

What evidence do you have that any of those are "sock" accounts?

I see that sock accounts are allowed here - actually doesn't look there are any rules at all on this board.

I have no sock accounts, barely have time to post using this one.

Funny seeing that come from "Doc Dutch" like we don't know who that really is.

 

[gfm7175]

It is not a live vaccine,

The COVID mRNA jabs are not vaccines. What's the difference between a "live vaccine" and a "vaccine"?

so you do not get Covid

Yes, you do. Those jabs effectively instruct your body to produce COVID.

from the Covid vaccine.

No such vaccine exists.

It creates particles that are similar to the particles in Covid, but are not Covid.

IOW, according to you, it ISN'T a COVID vaccine, yet it IS a COVID vaccine? You are now in paradox.

It is a vaccine, not a treatment.

It is a treatment (and is apparently habit forming for certain people).

It does no good given after infection.

It essentially IS an infection, dude. It is instructing your body to infect itself.

No it does not. It creates a particle used in Covid, but not the entire Covid virus.

This is a rewording of your paradox from earlier.