Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
You've got a pornographic mind.
Scale of Brexit disaster for Brits unfolding.
- Thread starter moon
- Start date
You've got a pornographic mind.
The English should have stayed hidden amongst their European neighbors- instead of exposing themselves through Brexit to the scorn of their former colonies.
[/B]"Well who do you think you are kidding Mr Moon, if you think old England's done" ?
That's the first line from the signature song for an old English TV sit-com called "Dad's Army." (In the original, the name, "Hitler" appears where I have substituted "Moon") "Dad's Army" was a popular half-hour show that depicted the amusing misadventures of an elderly platoon of Englishmen enrolled in the Home Guard. The Home Guard was formed in May 1940 as England's final line of defence against a German invasion.
In my opinion, the real English have always been a people who preferred to live in the regional villages and towns of their country, and they have always been an innately conservative folk in terms of their general political world-view. That's not to deny that there are unfortunately , - as is the case in every Western nation today-, a sizeable number of English, who, due to being pig- ignorant, clinically, psychiatrically disturbed or irremediably deluded or Darkie immigrants who are hustling the Welfare State. I mean, thousands of people in England voted for Jeremy Corbyn to become Prime Minister just a few years ago, and in some ways Corbyn was a more dangerous and, feral leftist flake than Biden (because Biden doesn't really know where he is, or what he's actually doing, or saying at any single point in time).
Getting back to the English - the real native English - is not some dread-locked Rastafarian from Brixton or some curry-stinking Bangladeshi in the East End of London who is putting up a large, fluoro - orange banner in Aldgate that reads: [B} "WARNING YOU ARE NOW ENTERING A ZONE WHERE SHARIA LAW APPLIES["/B] When I saw this, I thought, WTF ?! This is the dead- centre of London, the ancient capital of England, and the Darkies have now got the brazen cheek to be putting up a large public notice saying English law doesn't apply in this part of central London, because we the Islamic "Floppidoodle" tribes have decided to take control. At the time , there wasn't just this one banner being hung up, there were heaps of them on display all the way down the main road to Whitechapel ! I was so mortified, before I caught the train home, I found a London Cop (a MET Officer) and asked him if the banners being hung up in the East End were legal. The cop said to me "My understanding is that, right now, the issue is in the process being investigated by MET's senior management.
The regional, native English shrugged of the media scare campaign the that were launched at them, they gave out-of-touch, Westminster political establishment and it's chief "Boo boy", then Prime Minister, David Cameron, the finger, because they had seen for themselves what Third World immigration had done to inner London, Birmingham, Manchester along with cities and towns like Luton ( now a no-go zone for whites), Slough, Leicester, Leeds, Reading, Wolverhampton and so on. The native, conservative, regional English folk were far wiser politically than a privileged, pretentious, popinjay like David Cameron. They rightly feared the mass-immigration of of uncivilised peasants and heathens into England. They knew that precipitate mass-immigration into a culturally refined, advanced Western nation has only one result. It is the inevitable result that is the expansion of every type of social pathology imaginable with the growth of the immigrant enclaves. Here is one example, it is estimated that a phenomenal number - many hundred of thousands of white English girls have been raped after being administered drugs, forcibly raped at knife-point, gang-raped by large numbers of men- all of them pakistani muslims. These men are members of so-called "grooming gangs". Although this horror, which has been going on for years has been exposed, a a thick cloak of PC silence has been through over the whole scandal. From England's politicians and press there is only....crickets. (If you doubt this appalling tragedy is true, it's very easy to check what I say on your lap-top)
I lived with my wife (she is a native Englishwoma) and our son, who was born in England for near 20 years in the town of Bishop's Stortford. I loved England and the English people. We has a week-end cottage in a village called Bramfield in Suffold. Bramfield was the iconic English village, our neighbours were great people, most of the houses had the traditional style of English garden (i.e. the kind that is not perfectly manicured, but a little overgrwn and features lots of wildly disposed, beautiful flowers in the spring and summer months), the surrounding countryside is glorious with lots of cows and horses milling about. The People were polite and respectful of each other. Outside every other house, the owner had placed a box of "unsupervised" eggs laid by their own chickens; it was an honour system whereby, if you wanted to buy some of the eggs you put into the box what you thought was a fair amount of cash for the number of eggs you took. Similarly the village church, St Andrews was built in the 14th century (the orginal was a timber church built on the same site that is mentioned in the Doomsday Book. St Andrews contains some of the rarest, most beautiful and well - preserved medieval artifacts in England. Despite this thefront doors to the church are never locked and nothing of value inside is protected from vandal or thieves. This is because the people of Bramfield and the neighbouring village TRUST that the people in their community are decent, moral human beings.
Before you scoff at the Brexiteers, Moon, you should read some history - could I suggest the year 1940 in the Second World War. If you take the time to read about the "Battle of Britain" you will learn there are some very good reasons the English have for wanting to keep their island home and its culture racially/ethnically homogenous. Mainly, it is because they are, generally speaking a fair-minded, principled and moral people, who strive to "do the right thing". If ever their were courageous and selfless young men, it was those (some only 19 years old) who took to the skies above the South of England to take on Hitler's Luftwaffe in a theatre of war where the stakes for England could not possibly have been be higher.
You point out that the Brish Empire ended around the mid-1950. Before you enjoy your giggle of schadenfreude, remember, that when the British colonised places like India, although they were certainly there to "make a buck", they also left a lot behind in terms of schools, the English language, infrastructure (sealed roads, bridges, dams, transportation systems, administrative know-how, military training, legal systems, and so on. But you will simply respond by saying . "What about the Zulu Wars ? That was pure rapacious greed in a scramble to for the Brits to get their hands on as many South African diamonds as they could., etc.
Well, I'm not going get into that argument, because it bores me. What I would rather say is this. As your map illustrates, the West is in Decline. A famous German philosopher of History, predicted the current symptoms of Western civilizational decline very accurately in a book he published in 1922; his name was Oswald Spengler, and the book was called "The Decline of the West" I mean you just have to look at America;the percentage of the population that is White and of North-Western European descent is currently about 60% and falling at an alarming rate; when it falls below a certain critical percentage, that's it. IT'S GAME OVER, BABY; because Wester Culture (which is the source of Western civilisation) is largely determined GENETICALLY (I would estimate as much as 80% of racial culture is under genetic control). When America falls, the Anglosphere will rapidly follow and with it the non - English speaking nations of North-Western Europe, like: Sweden, Denmark, Noway, Iceland, Germany, Belgium, Luxumbourg, Holland and so on. A NEW DARK AGE WILL THEN DESCEND. How long it will last, what form it will take and what will follow it, I have no idea.
So, finally, what I have to say to you , Moon, is this...IF you take a White, Western nation like England and put out the welcome mat to every:COOLIE; JUNGLE BUNNY; CHICANO; PUNKA-WALLAH, WETBACK KAFFIR;PAKI; WOG;WOP; SANDNIGGER; DAGO; PYGMI; YID; MULATTO; SPIC and so forth in the world, you will destroy that country (England). It will devolve from a nation of cultured, civilised, well-mannered and largely moral people into a barrel of vulgar, degenerate, rambunctious and ultimately violent, hairy-assed monkeys. That's not a theory - THAT'S A FACT (Again, just take a brief glimpse at America - the place is falling apart BIG TIME - and they just don't get it ??
Anyway as I'm a MAJOR Anglophile, of direct, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant descent, my reply to those wretches who denounce Brexit, and would instead turn their beautiful Island into shit-hole like "MEXIFORNIA" is as follows....
We, Moon, shall NEVER surrender it....
This royal throne of king, this sceptered isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars
This other Eden, demi-paradise
This fortress built by nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea',
Which serves it in the office of a wall,
Or as a moat defensive to a house.
Against the enve of less happier minds
This blessed plot, this Earth, this realm...this England,
This nurse, this teeming womb of Royal Kings,
Feared by their breed and famous by their birth,
Renouned for their deeds as far from home.
For Christian service and true chivalry,
As is the sepulchre in stubborn Jewry,
Of the world's ransom, blessed Mary's son,[/SIZE=4]
{SIZe]This land of such dear souls, this dear, dear, land.
Dear for reputation throughout the world,
This island, This fortress....This England.[/SIZE=4]
by William Shakespeare, 1590)
Dachshund - the Wonder Hound
DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
Last edited:
moon
Satire for Sanity
The English political theater is now almost as corrupt and redundant as the American model.
The incumbent Tories have the worst popularity figures in their history following the disaster of Brexit, their Covid slaughter of the elderly, the criminal capers of Boris Johnson, the jaw-sagging ineptitude of Thick Lizzie and now a cold and hungry country experiencing a Tory-made recession from which it might never recover.
That's the background to date. If that wasn't bad enough for Brits looking to oust their apology for a government then they will be further devastated to discover that the official opposition to the Tories is led by ........................................a Brexiteer.
Haw, haw.....................haw, haw, haw...........................haw, haw...............................haw.
Survivors of British colonialism applaud the British for their stupidity . The reckoning is becoming apparent.
Haw, haw.............................haw.
The incumbent Tories have the worst popularity figures in their history following the disaster of Brexit, their Covid slaughter of the elderly, the criminal capers of Boris Johnson, the jaw-sagging ineptitude of Thick Lizzie and now a cold and hungry country experiencing a Tory-made recession from which it might never recover.
That's the background to date. If that wasn't bad enough for Brits looking to oust their apology for a government then they will be further devastated to discover that the official opposition to the Tories is led by ........................................a Brexiteer.
Haw, haw.....................haw, haw, haw...........................haw, haw...............................haw.
Survivors of British colonialism applaud the British for their stupidity . The reckoning is becoming apparent.
Haw, haw.............................haw.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Readers might find it amusing that the confused and Brexit-humiliated Brit maggot is inviting me to comment in his ' Scale of Brexit Disaster ' ape thread ........from which I am banned.
Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw........................haw, haw..............................haw
Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw........................haw, haw..............................haw
moon
Satire for Sanity
Every strike taking place in UK this winter: updating list of dates from Royal Mail, RMT, NHS and teachers
The winter of strike action will affect services ranging from the NHS, transport, Royal Mail, teachers, to civil servants
https://www.nationalworld.com/news/...pdating-list-dates-royal-mail-rmt-nhs-3926988
The UK is facing the biggest wave of industrial action in decades this winter as workers walkout due to escalating disputes over pay, conditions and terms.
Ballots are taking place in a range of sectors while talks in some areas have come too late to avoid disruption. The winter of strike action looms across services ranging from the NHS to transport, with railways, postal services, teachers, hospital staff and civil servants among the public services that will be affected.
Listed is every sector striking this winter and the dates workers will walk out. This list will be kept updated throughout the winter.
Railways
London Tube services
Postal service
Teachers
University staff
Nurses and hospital staff
Driving examiners
Civil servants
Airport workers
Eurostar Security Staff
100,000 government workers will walk out on February 1st.
The winter of strike action will affect services ranging from the NHS, transport, Royal Mail, teachers, to civil servants
https://www.nationalworld.com/news/...pdating-list-dates-royal-mail-rmt-nhs-3926988
The UK is facing the biggest wave of industrial action in decades this winter as workers walkout due to escalating disputes over pay, conditions and terms.
Ballots are taking place in a range of sectors while talks in some areas have come too late to avoid disruption. The winter of strike action looms across services ranging from the NHS to transport, with railways, postal services, teachers, hospital staff and civil servants among the public services that will be affected.
Listed is every sector striking this winter and the dates workers will walk out. This list will be kept updated throughout the winter.
Railways
London Tube services
Postal service
Teachers
University staff
Nurses and hospital staff
Driving examiners
Civil servants
Airport workers
Eurostar Security Staff
100,000 government workers will walk out on February 1st.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Having a united Europe doesn't appeal to any ' America First ' asshole, militarily or commercially. I just don't get the notion that El Trumpo was in cahoots with the Russians though. I don't see how Russia benefited from Trump's election. ISRAEL, though, had its hands all over the US elections through AIPAC and Trump made an absolute asshole of himself , universally, by going against international law and US United Nations commitments by cow-towing to Netanyahu's demands. Actually AGREEING to Israeli annexations of somebody else's country was the action of a debtor.
The UK lost its voice in European decisions through Brexit. It's now at the mercy of any internal tyranny that wants to remove the rights of Brits which were enshrined in European law.
Last edited:
moon
Satire for Sanity
Trade down, economy sinking, support falling: is the tide finally turning on Brexit?
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...falling-is-the-tide-finally-turning-on-brexit
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...falling-is-the-tide-finally-turning-on-brexit
serendipity
Verified User
As the Remoaners cling on to their hope that Britain's got Brexit fatigue: The 10 awkward questions you should throw at the next EU 'Rejoiner' who corners you at a dinner party
Disgruntled ‘Remainers’ – those politicians, civil servants and lobbyists who have wanted to pull us backwards since we voted decisively to leave the European Union – have a spring in their step.
Last week, on the third anniversary of our departure from the EU, a survey found that some 57 per cent of Britons were now in favour of rejoining.
And little wonder! Those who we could once dismiss as ‘Remoaners’ have, in recent years, quietly morphed into something even more insidious: ‘Rejoiners.’ Every day, they tell us that Brexit has failed, defying the facts. And they think if they repeat this mantra often enough, people will believe it.
Rejoiners want us to go cap in hand to our ‘friends’ in Brussels, who, if we ask nicely, might forgive the British people for our democratic vote in 2016 and allow us back in. On their own terms, of course.
Rejoiners have complained for years that Leave voters didn’t understand what they were voting for. Well, now let them tell the country what exactly they are proposing when they insist we become part of the EU again – and what it might mean for each of us, after three years of freedom.
When you’re next confronted at a dinner party by a Rejoiner who thinks that Brexit was a mistake, just fire back with a few of these questions…
1) If we rejoined the EU, how much would Britain pay into its budget per year?
During our final year of membership in 2020, this country paid £17.4 billion to the European Union. At that time, we also had a negotiated rebate of £4.2 billion, which would no longer be an option upon rejoining.
Since Brexit, the EU budget has ballooned. Some of that money would be spent in the UK – but that would be for the EU to decide, not us. We could hardly expect our payment into that budget to be less than that of France, whose contribution is now €24 billion (£21.3 billion) a year.
Meanwhile, we’re still paying the EU for leaving. The UK has around £25 billion left to pay on its ‘divorce bill’ to the EU, which, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility, won’t be settled before 2057.
2) If free movement into the UK from the EU were to be restored, what would annual net migration be?
In May 2004, the European Union expanded to include eight former communist states in Central and Eastern Europe.
The Labour Government of the day estimated that a maximum of 13,000 people a year might come to the UK from new member states.
By 2016, the real number was more than 300,000 per year.
If free movement into the UK were to be restored – as it must, to be a member of the EU – it would also apply in due course to future member states. At present, there are eight more candidates vying for membership – they have a combined population of 145 million.
Add that to the current EU population of 447 million, and ask those would-be Rejoiners: how many do you think would come to the UK?
And how would this wave of cheap labour affect wages, housing, public services and the low productivity by which our population balloons?
3) What proportion of the global economy, and of British trade, will the EU represent in 20 years?
When we joined the European Economic Community (EEC, as it was in 1973), it represented 20 per cent of the global economy. By the time of our EU withdrawal in 2020, it was eight per cent and falling.
As EU members, our exports to the stagnant bloc barely increased in 20 years, despite us being in the Single Market. Exports outside the EU, however, grew four times faster. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) forecasts 94 per cent of world economic growth to 2040 will be outside the EU.
Three years after we left, it’s fair to say that successive Conservative administrations have failed to capitalise on our Brexit freedoms. Certainly, we have paid dearly for our departure, and without stripping away the restrictive red tape that EU membership entailed. The Government is hoping to introduce an all-encompassing ‘Brexit Freedoms Bill’ to make it easier to amend or remove those EU laws we have retained.
4) What would be the effect on future trade of abandoning our new, closer ties with the growing Pacific region?
The Indo-Pacific region is booming, and is expected to account for more than half of the world’s total growth to 2050. By the end of the decade, around half of the world’s 2.3 billion middle-class consumers will be there.
Its market for our exports is growing, too, reaching £95 billion in 2022. And we have a trading surplus. We have signed trade agreements with Australia, Singapore and Japan, and are close to a deal with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a huge free-trade area with over 500 million people which, with the UK, would be economically more significant than the entire EU.
Going back into the EU – what the Labour Party is calling ‘dynamic alignment’ – would mean throwing this away and turning our backs on future trade growth.
5) What would be the economic cost of joining the eurozone?
Another condition of our return to the EU would be to ditch the pound sterling for the euro. As many economists warned, the euro has helped to turn the EU into a zone of slow growth, and has cost most members a huge amount of wealth.
One German think-tank has calculated that, since adopting the euro, every Frenchman has lost on average €21,000, and every Italian €74,000. How much would the average British family stand to lose?
Those who we could once dismiss as ¿Remoaners¿ have, in recent years, quietly morphed into something even more insidious: ¿Rejoiners.¿ Pictured: Poeple queue to cast their vote at a polling station in southwest London
88
Those who we could once dismiss as ¿Remoaners¿ have, in recent years, quietly morphed into something even more insidious: Rejoiners.
6) Will the UK rejoin the Common Fisheries Policy?
The Common Fisheries Policy was sprung on Britain just as it was applying to join the then EEC. So disadvantageous were the arrangements to take over the fishing rights in new member states’ waters that Norway refused to sign up to the project, scuttling its membership bid, a position from which it has never budged.
By 2026, we will have regained full control over our fishing waters, to the great benefit of the North of England and Scotland. Rejoining the EU would give this away.
7) As we now have a Free Trade Agreement with the EU, what precisely would be the advantage of rejoining the Single Market and Customs Union?
Signed in 2019, the Free Trade Agreement facilitates trade between the UK and the EU. Despite unscrupulous scare stories, official statistics show that our exports to the EU have not been damaged by leaving. They even broke all records in July 2022.
Foreign investment in the UK is higher than in any EU country. So why rejoin the Single Market and the Customs Union? It would be costly, undemocratic, divisive and for little or no economic benefit.
6) Will the UK rejoin the Common Fisheries Policy?
The Common Fisheries Policy was sprung on Britain just as it was applying to join the then EEC. So disadvantageous were the arrangements to take over the fishing rights in new member states’ waters that Norway refused to sign up to the project, scuttling its membership bid, a position from which it has never budged.
By 2026, we will have regained full control over our fishing waters, to the great benefit of the North of England and Scotland. Rejoining the EU would give this away.
7) As we now have a Free Trade Agreement with the EU, what precisely would be the advantage of rejoining the Single Market and Customs Union?
Signed in 2019, the Free Trade Agreement facilitates trade between the UK and the EU. Despite unscrupulous scare stories, official statistics show that our exports to the EU have not been damaged by leaving. They even broke all records in July 2022.
Foreign investment in the UK is higher than in any EU country. So why rejoin the Single Market and the Customs Union? It would be costly, undemocratic, divisive and for little or no economic benefit.
8) Would Brussels lawmakers have priority over Parliament, and would the European Court of Justice be superior to British courts?
When we joined the EEC in 1973, European law became superior to British law, and our courts had to apply it, irrespective of the wishes of parliament. We voted in 2016 to regain control.
At present, the Government is trying to disentangle us from thousands of regulations we did not choose. If we rejoin the EU, in whatever ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ form (‘dynamic alignment’), we would again have to accept all of its laws, along with hundreds of new ones adopted since we left.
9) Would Rejoiners agree to the EU being in overall charge of our foreign and security policy?
The EU aims to be a federal state, with a foreign policy and armed forces under its control. Even in the present and dangerous wartime situation, it is meddling in what is Nato’s job. And, despite Brexit, some British civil servants are quietly entangling us in EU defence arrangements.
Yet the EU’s divisions and feebleness over the invasion of Ukraine – in contrast to Brexit Britain’s rapid and decisive aid – prove that it cannot be trusted with our national security.
10) Would Rejoiners commit to a referendum to approve the terms negotiated for a new relationship with the EU?
The largest democratic vote in our history decided that we should leave the EU. Remainers in Parliament, the courts and the Civil Service tried to block this decision. They demanded a second referendum to reverse the first.
Would they now commit to a second referendum after they have renegotiated new arrangements with the EU, whether for a soft or a hard ‘Bre-entry’? Would they let the people decide? Or would they want to do it behind our backs?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/columni...s-throw-EU-Rejoiner-corners-dinner-party.html
Disgruntled ‘Remainers’ – those politicians, civil servants and lobbyists who have wanted to pull us backwards since we voted decisively to leave the European Union – have a spring in their step.
Last week, on the third anniversary of our departure from the EU, a survey found that some 57 per cent of Britons were now in favour of rejoining.
And little wonder! Those who we could once dismiss as ‘Remoaners’ have, in recent years, quietly morphed into something even more insidious: ‘Rejoiners.’ Every day, they tell us that Brexit has failed, defying the facts. And they think if they repeat this mantra often enough, people will believe it.
Rejoiners want us to go cap in hand to our ‘friends’ in Brussels, who, if we ask nicely, might forgive the British people for our democratic vote in 2016 and allow us back in. On their own terms, of course.
Rejoiners have complained for years that Leave voters didn’t understand what they were voting for. Well, now let them tell the country what exactly they are proposing when they insist we become part of the EU again – and what it might mean for each of us, after three years of freedom.
When you’re next confronted at a dinner party by a Rejoiner who thinks that Brexit was a mistake, just fire back with a few of these questions…
1) If we rejoined the EU, how much would Britain pay into its budget per year?
During our final year of membership in 2020, this country paid £17.4 billion to the European Union. At that time, we also had a negotiated rebate of £4.2 billion, which would no longer be an option upon rejoining.
Since Brexit, the EU budget has ballooned. Some of that money would be spent in the UK – but that would be for the EU to decide, not us. We could hardly expect our payment into that budget to be less than that of France, whose contribution is now €24 billion (£21.3 billion) a year.
Meanwhile, we’re still paying the EU for leaving. The UK has around £25 billion left to pay on its ‘divorce bill’ to the EU, which, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility, won’t be settled before 2057.
2) If free movement into the UK from the EU were to be restored, what would annual net migration be?
In May 2004, the European Union expanded to include eight former communist states in Central and Eastern Europe.
The Labour Government of the day estimated that a maximum of 13,000 people a year might come to the UK from new member states.
By 2016, the real number was more than 300,000 per year.
If free movement into the UK were to be restored – as it must, to be a member of the EU – it would also apply in due course to future member states. At present, there are eight more candidates vying for membership – they have a combined population of 145 million.
Add that to the current EU population of 447 million, and ask those would-be Rejoiners: how many do you think would come to the UK?
And how would this wave of cheap labour affect wages, housing, public services and the low productivity by which our population balloons?
3) What proportion of the global economy, and of British trade, will the EU represent in 20 years?
When we joined the European Economic Community (EEC, as it was in 1973), it represented 20 per cent of the global economy. By the time of our EU withdrawal in 2020, it was eight per cent and falling.
As EU members, our exports to the stagnant bloc barely increased in 20 years, despite us being in the Single Market. Exports outside the EU, however, grew four times faster. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) forecasts 94 per cent of world economic growth to 2040 will be outside the EU.
Three years after we left, it’s fair to say that successive Conservative administrations have failed to capitalise on our Brexit freedoms. Certainly, we have paid dearly for our departure, and without stripping away the restrictive red tape that EU membership entailed. The Government is hoping to introduce an all-encompassing ‘Brexit Freedoms Bill’ to make it easier to amend or remove those EU laws we have retained.
4) What would be the effect on future trade of abandoning our new, closer ties with the growing Pacific region?
The Indo-Pacific region is booming, and is expected to account for more than half of the world’s total growth to 2050. By the end of the decade, around half of the world’s 2.3 billion middle-class consumers will be there.
Its market for our exports is growing, too, reaching £95 billion in 2022. And we have a trading surplus. We have signed trade agreements with Australia, Singapore and Japan, and are close to a deal with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a huge free-trade area with over 500 million people which, with the UK, would be economically more significant than the entire EU.
Going back into the EU – what the Labour Party is calling ‘dynamic alignment’ – would mean throwing this away and turning our backs on future trade growth.
5) What would be the economic cost of joining the eurozone?
Another condition of our return to the EU would be to ditch the pound sterling for the euro. As many economists warned, the euro has helped to turn the EU into a zone of slow growth, and has cost most members a huge amount of wealth.
One German think-tank has calculated that, since adopting the euro, every Frenchman has lost on average €21,000, and every Italian €74,000. How much would the average British family stand to lose?
Those who we could once dismiss as ¿Remoaners¿ have, in recent years, quietly morphed into something even more insidious: ¿Rejoiners.¿ Pictured: Poeple queue to cast their vote at a polling station in southwest London
88
Those who we could once dismiss as ¿Remoaners¿ have, in recent years, quietly morphed into something even more insidious: Rejoiners.
6) Will the UK rejoin the Common Fisheries Policy?
The Common Fisheries Policy was sprung on Britain just as it was applying to join the then EEC. So disadvantageous were the arrangements to take over the fishing rights in new member states’ waters that Norway refused to sign up to the project, scuttling its membership bid, a position from which it has never budged.
By 2026, we will have regained full control over our fishing waters, to the great benefit of the North of England and Scotland. Rejoining the EU would give this away.
7) As we now have a Free Trade Agreement with the EU, what precisely would be the advantage of rejoining the Single Market and Customs Union?
Signed in 2019, the Free Trade Agreement facilitates trade between the UK and the EU. Despite unscrupulous scare stories, official statistics show that our exports to the EU have not been damaged by leaving. They even broke all records in July 2022.
Foreign investment in the UK is higher than in any EU country. So why rejoin the Single Market and the Customs Union? It would be costly, undemocratic, divisive and for little or no economic benefit.
6) Will the UK rejoin the Common Fisheries Policy?
The Common Fisheries Policy was sprung on Britain just as it was applying to join the then EEC. So disadvantageous were the arrangements to take over the fishing rights in new member states’ waters that Norway refused to sign up to the project, scuttling its membership bid, a position from which it has never budged.
By 2026, we will have regained full control over our fishing waters, to the great benefit of the North of England and Scotland. Rejoining the EU would give this away.
7) As we now have a Free Trade Agreement with the EU, what precisely would be the advantage of rejoining the Single Market and Customs Union?
Signed in 2019, the Free Trade Agreement facilitates trade between the UK and the EU. Despite unscrupulous scare stories, official statistics show that our exports to the EU have not been damaged by leaving. They even broke all records in July 2022.
Foreign investment in the UK is higher than in any EU country. So why rejoin the Single Market and the Customs Union? It would be costly, undemocratic, divisive and for little or no economic benefit.
8) Would Brussels lawmakers have priority over Parliament, and would the European Court of Justice be superior to British courts?
When we joined the EEC in 1973, European law became superior to British law, and our courts had to apply it, irrespective of the wishes of parliament. We voted in 2016 to regain control.
At present, the Government is trying to disentangle us from thousands of regulations we did not choose. If we rejoin the EU, in whatever ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ form (‘dynamic alignment’), we would again have to accept all of its laws, along with hundreds of new ones adopted since we left.
9) Would Rejoiners agree to the EU being in overall charge of our foreign and security policy?
The EU aims to be a federal state, with a foreign policy and armed forces under its control. Even in the present and dangerous wartime situation, it is meddling in what is Nato’s job. And, despite Brexit, some British civil servants are quietly entangling us in EU defence arrangements.
Yet the EU’s divisions and feebleness over the invasion of Ukraine – in contrast to Brexit Britain’s rapid and decisive aid – prove that it cannot be trusted with our national security.
10) Would Rejoiners commit to a referendum to approve the terms negotiated for a new relationship with the EU?
The largest democratic vote in our history decided that we should leave the EU. Remainers in Parliament, the courts and the Civil Service tried to block this decision. They demanded a second referendum to reverse the first.
Would they now commit to a second referendum after they have renegotiated new arrangements with the EU, whether for a soft or a hard ‘Bre-entry’? Would they let the people decide? Or would they want to do it behind our backs?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/columni...s-throw-EU-Rejoiner-corners-dinner-party.html
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Donald Trump's Scottish golf course blames Brexit after £3.7m loss 
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/busines...-scottish-golf-course-blames-brexit-37m-loss/
Trump golf courses face major financial problem from Brexit
Brexit is costing Trump's UK-based golf courses millions of dollars per year.
https://thecomeback.com/golf/trump-golf-courses-face-major-financial-problem-from-brexit.html
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/busines...-scottish-golf-course-blames-brexit-37m-loss/
Trump golf courses face major financial problem from Brexit
Brexit is costing Trump's UK-based golf courses millions of dollars per year.
https://thecomeback.com/golf/trump-golf-courses-face-major-financial-problem-from-brexit.html
serendipity
Verified User
Where's McMoonshi'ite?
Russia benefitted bigly. They saw Trump as useful years earlier. Junior said Trump got all the financing that they needed from Russia. Bannon pointed out money laundering as what Trump would most likely get nailed for. Russian oligarchs were in need of those services. That is why they bought apartments and homes from Trump at inflated prices. That is also why they provided money and Trump paid cash for golf courses during covid bad times. His golf courses are bleeding money. Trump called himself the king of debt. Suddenly paying cash.
serendipity
Verified User
Will McMoonshi'ite comment about this extremely detailed article, will she fuck!!
Last edited: