Schiff says Ukraine invasion ‘likely’

Schiff, Biden, Blinken were way out in front warning us that Putin was preparing to invade Ukraine.

It turns out that competent people make competent decisions. Who would have thought it? Just about anyone paying attention.
 
The Ukrainians are nearly useless, and our military is rapidly becoming shit.

The second rate European country Ukraine has fought a world superpower to a standstill and is slowing clawing back it's territory - and NATO weapons, training, and organization have proved themselves vastly superior to Russian weaponry and military doctrine.
 
Biden and Schiff were correct when they said Russia was going in. Rightys in this board criticized them for being stupid enough to believe it. There were threads on it. The rights should post apologies. Our intelligence had it all correct.
 
Biden and Schiff were correct when they said Russia was going in. Rightys in this board criticized them for being stupid enough to believe it. There were threads on it. The rights should post apologies. Our intelligence had it all correct.

MAGAs weren't just wrong about Biden's Intel leading up to the war...they continued to be catastrophically wrong after the war started.

The Ukraine will be totally over run within days.
Soon the Ukrainian Army will be all but destroyed.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, will be murdered soon. The Russian Federation will install a puppet government.The entire country of the Ukraine will be part of the Russian Federation.
^^ You are probably 100% correct.
Ukrainian army- leaderless, deserting, unsupported .
"YOU DO NOT POKE THE RUSSIAN BEAR!"
 
McCarthy Ejects Schiff and Swalwell From Intelligence ...

The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
Jan 24, 2023 — WASHINGTON — Speaker Kevin McCarthy on Tuesday unilaterally exiled Representatives Adam B. Schiff and Eric Swalwell from the House ...

Good riddance to those far left loons.
 
I have links all day, I just need to know what sources you consider reputable so you don't say the source is bad.

This was your request.

If Sarah Palin specifically predicted in 2006 that Russia would launch and invasion of conquest in Ukraine it would have been reported all over the mainstream media, and you could have found a mainstream news source link in ten seconds instead of playing word games
 
If Sarah Palin specifically predicted in 2006 that Russia would launch and invasion of conquest in Ukraine it would have been reported all over the mainstream media, and you could have found a mainstream news source link in ten seconds instead of playing word games

“After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next,” said Palin.

A blog post from American magazine Foreign Policy described such a scenario as “extremely far-fetched”, noting that Russia already held significant influence over Ukraine (presumably in the form of now ousted President Viktor Yanukovych) and that the magazine “didn’t see why violence would be necessary to bring Kiev to heel.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ade-ukraine-if-obama-was-elected-9167833.html
 
That's not a full scale invasion of conquest, which is what I asked you.


And having to wait 17 years for a prediction of conquest to come true doesn't even qualify as a good prediction. It's not actionable Intel.

Russia is not conducting a full scale invasion for conquest.

They retook the regions in the east comprised of Russian people.

And the fact that Palin could predict this 17 years before it happened means she has insight.
 
Russia is not conducting a full scale invasion for conquest.

They retook the regions in the east comprised of Russian people.

And the fact that Palin could predict this 17 years before it happened means she has insight.
The Donbass is 39%Russian. There are more Ukrainians in the Donbass than Russians.
 
Back
Top