A look at the Durham investigation

[martin]

and said there was no collusion......thanks.....but anyway, the topic is the Durham investigation......I know you would rather not talk about that, but Desh brought it up.....

We know you can't intelligently reply to an argument. Can't you even take one in, or quote one correctly? Mueller distinguished collusion from criminal conspiracy and made the point that he wasn't charged with finding collusion. His investigators did find contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. Those contacts meet the definition of collusion.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

The Republican investigation of Clinton has been going on for 32 years with nothing. Meanwhile, even Durham accidentally found trump crimes.

1) who's this investigator of Clinton that's been holding hearings the media isn't aware of....
2) and please link to indictments of Trump from Durham or anyone else.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

We know you can't intelligently reply to an argument. Can't you even take one in, or quote one correctly? Mueller distinguished collusion from criminal conspiracy and made the point that he wasn't charged with finding collusion. His investigators did find contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives. Those contacts meet the definition of collusion.

except they don't......Mueller found no collusion.......he indicated things Demmycrats could look at......they did......they found nothing they could indict Trump on........you've had years and come up with nothing.......why do you continue shoving your thumb up your ass when you know it hurts and it accomplishes nothing?.......