Irrelevant. Also, no one invited any of the scumbags he shot either.
Wrong and wrong. You don't have to like Wisconsin's law but it was legal for him to be carrying that rifle. He wasn't legally allowed to purchase it, but according to the letter of the law he was allowed to possess it. Feel free to make a dumb comment about how he was hunting people, since it was a hunting law that made it legal for him to carry the rifle. Also, he fired in self defense so it was legally discharged. He was found not guilty, remember that? You were pretty butthurt about it, no?
Again, irrelevant. Take it up with the cops who were dealing with a riot.
So you admit his life was in danger. Thank you.
I know the full story, far better than you do, apparently. You clearly don't understand Wisconsin's hunting laws regarding minors possessing rifles, or why Kyle was found not guilty. You just have your crybaby, pro riot, anti gun
feelings. I'm sure you would have preferred to see him beaten to death by that mob of rioting maniacs, but he wasn't. He used his second amendment right to protect himself, and there is one less child rapist and one less woman abuser because of it.