Russian death toll in Ukraine nearing 110,000

Trumpet said:
Here is what you posted: "I simply try to provide a balance. You are pro Azov Nazism. "

Nazism is what you posted spelled exactly the way you posted it.
Click to expand...

Correct. And this is what you posted in response;

Strumpet;Do you even know what Nazium is????????????????
Click to expand...


Oh, the fucking IRONY !


Haw, haw.........................haw.
 
moon said:
You surely know that it is the aim of the US to eliminate Russia as a military threat. US foreign policies have been insane for years. The advance of NATO is part of that strategy.
Click to expand...

Need any more evidence this is a contracted Russian bot hole?
 
Damocles said:
I think he has more Russian support than we want to believe. Russia is weirdly proud of their ability to absorb huge numbers of dead during a war, and some of the folks in Russia that I know make it very clear they believe that Ukraine is actually a fascist threat. I thought they were just afraid of giving their opinion at first, but I no longer believe that they are. Don't get me wrong, this is probably the least popular war there since Afghanistan, but it still has more support than not.
Click to expand...

I think, unsurprisingly, there will always be a core of support for Putin's war in Russia.

When this board started, there was still a substantial amount of support for the Iraq war (primarily from Republicans) even years after the excuses given for the need to invade had been debunked.

People don't like their nation to lose wars. American conservatives wanted us to stay in Vietnam and fight on to the elusive final victory.

I think think the war supporters in Russia tend to be older people who are still susceptible to Soviet style propaganda, as well as just conservative and nationalist Russians who at this point just don't want Russia to lose a war, regardless of why it started.

I personally don't know any Russian citizens who support the war, but my aqaintences tend to be the urban professional class.
 
moon said:
And you are a.........................?

Quite.
You should avoid my posts in future. I don't need your nonsense and you don't need my scorn.



Haw, haw.............................haw.
Click to expand...

Are you for real?????
 
moon said:
You've refused to accept the answer once.
Click to expand...
Well is this was your answer: "The advance of NATO is part of that strategy." You Couldn't really answer. I understand.
Ill give you another chance: Maybe you can provide documentation of nato's plan to invade and conquer Russia.
If you can't, I understand that too.
 
evince said:
Need any more evidence this is a contracted Russian bot hole?
Click to expand...

Russia was not a threat to the US militarily. They cannot beat Ukraine. When will countries learn you cannot beat people on their own turf? They have nowhere to go. They are protecting their homes and families from an invader. If you occupy a country, you will face a miserable time keeping it. We should have learned in Iraq and Vietnam. The old politicians and corporations do not have to win. They make a profit. Russia is making a terrible mistake.
 
Nordberg said:
Russia was not a threat to the US militarily. They cannot beat Ukraine. When will countries learn you cannot beat people on their own turf? They have nowhere to go. They are protecting their homes and families from an invader. If you occupy a country, you will face a miserable time keeping it. We should have learned in Iraq and Vietnam. The old politicians and corporations do not have to win. They make a profit. Russia is making a terrible mistake.
Click to expand...

Russia did this in Afghanistan back in the day too


Got stuck pouring money down that hole for nearly two decades
 
evince said:
Russia did this in Afghanistan back in the day too


Got stuck pouring money down that hole for nearly two decades
Click to expand...




My mistake


It was only one decade



24 December 1979 – 15 February 1989 (9 years, 1 month, 3 weeks and 1 day
 
Socrates said war is about money. It was then and is now. We fight so the military Industrial Complex will make money. We die in the streets so gun manufacturers prosper. It does not seem the American people are ready to stop it.
 
anonymoose said:
Well is this was your answer: "The advance of NATO is part of that strategy." You Couldn't really answer. I understand.
Ill give you another chance: Maybe you can provide documentation of nato's plan to invade and conquer Russia.
If you can't, I understand that too.
Click to expand...

Your 'understanding ' is too limited for my response.

NATO is a protection racket with US arms manufacturers at the apex . Its ' all together for war, boys ' mantra is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
Some of it is just hard-headedness and some of it is Butt-Hurtedness for sure!
Click to expand...

You are defending an establishment asshole who once fabricated a dictionary reference and posted it in support of his flailing argument.

Poor Earl.
So wrong, so weak, so lost.
 
Nordberg said:
Socrates said war is about money. It was then and is now. We fight so the military Industrial Complex will make money. We die in the streets so gun manufacturers prosper. It does not seem the American people are ready to stop it.
Click to expand...

Too narrow a view of it. The "prosperity", when it happens, is primarily an effect not a motivation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top