Religious conservative attacks, Police!

evince said:
Without warning?



They were telling them to cease and desist idiot


She disobeyed a police command during the commission of massive crimes
Click to expand...
Prove that SHE was told to halt or he would shoot. Moron. A video would be proof. Videos were being made.
 
ExpressLane said:
Halt or I will shoot would have worked for me. He just murdered her. There is no cop in any city other than the political DC that would have got away with that. The DC cop panicked and shot her to death.
Click to expand...

So when she saw police officers being beaten and attacked, when she saw a mob of violent insurrectionists trying to breach the inner sanctum of the Capitol while screaming "hang Mike Pence!", you're saying she felt it was okay for her to kick in a window to gain access to hundreds of U.S. congressman and Senators who were supposed to be meeting in closed session?
 
Cypress said:
The Capitol police were fighting for their lives to keep these Republican terrorists from breaching the Capitol and it's inner sanctum. 140 police officers were injured trying to prevent the insurrectionists from gaining entry.

How much more warning did she need that she shouldn't be there?
Click to expand...
Halt or I will shoot, would be fine.
Trespassing isn't a capital offense
 
https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/p...rnal-investigation-january-6-officer-involved



USCP Completes Internal Investigation into the January 6 Officer-Involved Shooting
August 23, 2021 Press Release
After interviewing multiple witnesses and reviewing all the available evidence, including video and radio calls, the United States Capitol Police has completed the internal investigation into the fatal shooting of Ms. Ashli Babbitt, which occurred in the Speaker’s Lobby on January 6.

USCP’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) determined the officer’s conduct was lawful and within Department policy, which says an officer may use deadly force only when the officer reasonably believes that action is in the defense of human life, including the officer’s own life, or in the defense of any person in immediate danger of serious physical injury.

The officer in this case, who is not being identified for the officer’s safety, will not be facing internal discipline.

This officer and the officer’s family have been the subject of numerous credible and specific threats for actions that were taken as part of the job of all our officers: defending the Congress, Members, staff and the democratic process.

The actions of the officer in this case potentially saved Members and staff from serious injury and possible death from a large crowd of rioters who forced their way into the U.S. Capitol and to the House Chamber where Members and staff were steps away. USCP Officers had barricaded the Speaker’s Lobby with furniture before a rioter shattered the glass door. If the doors were breached, the rioters would have immediate access to the House Chambers. The officer’s actions were consistent with the officer’s training and USCP policies and procedures.

On April 14, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia announced it would not pursue criminal charges based on insufficient evidence. The case was investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Metropolitan Police Department. The administrative investigation was launched after the criminal investigation was closed.
 
Jarod said:
Attempted murder, (she shouted her intent, “Hang Mike Pence”), is a capital offense.
Click to expand...
She did? Where is your proof? Let's see it or admit you are lying...again.


BTW: Capital punishment is abolished in the District of Columbia.

I would think a lawyer would know that.
 
evince said:
https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/p...rnal-investigation-january-6-officer-involved



USCP Completes Internal Investigation into the January 6 Officer-Involved Shooting
August 23, 2021 Press Release
After interviewing multiple witnesses and reviewing all the available evidence, including video and radio calls, the United States Capitol Police has completed the internal investigation into the fatal shooting of Ms. Ashli Babbitt, which occurred in the Speaker’s Lobby on January 6.

USCP’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) determined the officer’s conduct was lawful and within Department policy, which says an officer may use deadly force only when the officer reasonably believes that action is in the defense of human life, including the officer’s own life, or in the defense of any person in immediate danger of serious physical injury.

The officer in this case, who is not being identified for the officer’s safety, will not be facing internal discipline.

This officer and the officer’s family have been the subject of numerous credible and specific threats for actions that were taken as part of the job of all our officers: defending the Congress, Members, staff and the democratic process.

The actions of the officer in this case potentially saved Members and staff from serious injury and possible death from a large crowd of rioters who forced their way into the U.S. Capitol and to the House Chamber where Members and staff were steps away. USCP Officers had barricaded the Speaker’s Lobby with furniture before a rioter shattered the glass door. If the doors were breached, the rioters would have immediate access to the House Chambers. The officer’s actions were consistent with the officer’s training and USCP policies and procedures.

On April 14, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia announced it would not pursue criminal charges based on insufficient evidence. The case was investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia and the Metropolitan Police Department. The administrative investigation was launched after the criminal investigation was closed.
Click to expand...

This Republican Party hates all cops



Except the ones who kill black Americans illegally
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top