obama continues the gray hair trend

Yurt said:
so everyone who settles is guilty.....?
Click to expand...


A better question, is everybody who settles innocent? Unlikely, I think it's not a bad indicator of guilt and avoidance. Letterman had the guts to look the audience in the eye rather than pay off. O'Reilly took the easy way out, buying silence rather than either confessing or defending himself. Does having enough money to buy an accuser's silence automatically connote innocense or merely wealth? Of course sexual perversion does carry a more sinister aura than plain old philandering.
The hypocrisy of the holier-than-thou Right is shining brightly in the sunshine. bush had multiple interviews with an accused sex offender and your side was silent. Now Obama grants an interview to Letterman and you all don the robes of a celibate monk screaming at the devil.. Hypocritical fakery.
 
Last edited:
TE=belme1201;541233]A better question, is everybody who settles innocent?
Click to expand...

in this instance, no, it actually is not, as you have explicitily indicated that because o'reilly settled, he must be guilty.....and this is further evidenced by your comments below.....

Unlikely, I think it's not a bad indicator of guilt and avoidance. Letterman had the guts to look the audience in the eye rather than pay off. O'Reilly took the easy way out, buying silence rather than either confessing or defending himself. Does having enough money to buy an accuser's silence automatically connote innocense or merely wealth? Of course sexual perversion does carry a more sinister aura than plain old philandering.
The hypocrisy of the holier-than-thou Right is shining brightly in the sunshine. bush had multiple interviews with an accused sex offender and your side was silent. Now Obama grants an interview to Letterman and you all don the robes of a celibate monk screaming at the devil.. Hypocritical fakery.
Click to expand...

you indicate that settling is buying silence, hence guilty.....so i again, ask my question:

is everyone who settles....guilty? the onus is on you to answer this question.
 
Yurt said:
in this instance, no, it actually is not, as you have explicitily indicated that because o'reilly settled, he must be guilty.....and this is further evidenced by your comments below.....



you indicate that settling is buying silence, hence guilty.....so i again, ask my question:

is everyone who settles....guilty? the onus is on you to answer this question.
Click to expand...

I will put it this way to you. If I was in O'Reilly's shoes, I would fight my accuser to the bitter end rather than have the stigma of perversion on me for the rest of my life. If I was innocent, my accuser could not possibly have taped evidence as claimed, therefore I would fight her.
O'Reilly chose to pay his accuser $millions, suppressing any further discussion of the case as a condition, thus leaving doubts open as to innocence or guilt. The reason he bought silence rather than fight was? Unless, of course, the "liar" wasn't lying.
 
meme said:
he's probably having it dyed that way...he sure hell hasn't done any work or shown any worries about us or our country...he is too busy gallivanting all around the world for Olympics and phony Nobel awards and around our country doing fundraisers and David Letterman..
Click to expand...
God damn! If only he had a ranch he could clear brush on, then he would be doing something and probably looking sexy in his jeans too!
 
LOL, I would doubt the Dear Leader has ever cleared brush in his life, way beneath him..Plus when does he have time...way too many parties, trips overseas, and fundraisers for his crooked friends (all on our dime) to attend..
 
belme1201 said:
So you deny that your idol O'Reillly settled a sexual harrassment case involving phone sex with an employee for $millions unnder conditions of silence. Where there's smoke, my friend. He didn't pay out big bucks for nothing.
Click to expand...
You have no idea how much he settled for, settlement amounts are not public information. He could have settled for slightly less than it would have cost to defend it in court and there are way more reasons that "guilty" to settle. How much is your image worth if you are in Olbermann's or O'Reilly's position?
 
belme1201 said:
A better question, is everybody who settles innocent? Unlikely, I think it's not a bad indicator of guilt and avoidance. Letterman had the guts to look the audience in the eye rather than pay off. O'Reilly took the easy way out, buying silence rather than either confessing or defending himself. Does having enough money to buy an accuser's silence automatically connote innocense or merely wealth? Of course sexual perversion does carry a more sinister aura than plain old philandering.
The hypocrisy of the holier-than-thou Right is shining brightly in the sunshine. bush had multiple interviews with an accused sex offender and your side was silent. Now Obama grants an interview to Letterman and you all don the robes of a celibate monk screaming at the devil.. Hypocritical fakery.
Click to expand...
LOL.

You aren't arguing that O'Reilly is guilty, just that he "took the easy way out," really?

First you are all, "do you deny"... then you are, "he took the easy way out"...
 
belme1201 said:
So you deny that your idol O'Reillly settled a sexual harrassment case involving phone sex with an employee for $millions unnder conditions of silence. Where there's smoke, my friend. He didn't pay out big bucks for nothing.
Click to expand...
You made the accusation; its not up to me to prove you wrong.
 
belme1201 said:
A better question, is everybody who settles innocent? Unlikely, I think it's not a bad indicator of guilt and avoidance. Letterman had the guts to look the audience in the eye rather than pay off. O'Reilly took the easy way out, buying silence rather than either confessing or defending himself. Does having enough money to buy an accuser's silence automatically connote innocense or merely wealth? Of course sexual perversion does carry a more sinister aura than plain old philandering.
The hypocrisy of the holier-than-thou Right is shining brightly in the sunshine. bush had multiple interviews with an accused sex offender and your side was silent. Now Obama grants an interview to Letterman and you all don the robes of a celibate monk screaming at the devil.. Hypocritical fakery.
Click to expand...

:hand: Perfect!
 
meme said:
LOL, I would doubt the Dear Leader has ever cleared brush in his life, way beneath him..Plus when does he have time...way too many parties, trips overseas, and fundraisers for his crooked friends (all on our dime) to attend..
Click to expand...

Damn that Obama. Born with a silver spoon in his mouth, educated in private schools and top tier universities, owner of how many failed businesses... what does he know about the rest of us peons?
 
belme1201 said:
I will put it this way to you. If I was in O'Reilly's shoes, I would fight my accuser to the bitter end rather than have the stigma of perversion on me for the rest of my life. If I was innocent, my accuser could not possibly have taped evidence as claimed, therefore I would fight her.
O'Reilly chose to pay his accuser $millions, suppressing any further discussion of the case as a condition, thus leaving doubts open as to innocence or guilt. The reason he bought silence rather than fight was? Unless, of course, the "liar" wasn't lying.
Click to expand...

why is it you refuse to answer my question about everyone being guilty?

o'reilly is not you, he is a major public figure and often times for them it is safer and cheaper to simply end the ordeal so it is out of the public's mind...look at OJ...even though found innocent in a criminal trial, people believe he is guilty, so it is not true that always fighting something and being declared innocent makes people believe you're innocent, much better to shut it down and get it out of the public view....

you don't know how much he paid, nice try.....
 
christiefan915 said:
Damn that Obama. Born with a silver spoon in his mouth, educated in private schools and top tier universities, owner of how many failed businesses... what does he know about the rest of us peons?
Click to expand...

obama did go the most exclusive private school in HI....and did go to top tier uni's....so yeah....he did live a life most of us don't
 
Yurt said:
but you don't know and it can't actually be proven he was guilty of anything, thanks for admitting that you have nothing on o'reilly but conjecture :clink:
Click to expand...

Nor does that fact make him innocent, merely untried. It can't be proven because money was paid to buy silence to end the case. Check the news of the day, the girl's attorney rejected $2 million, the speculation is that it was at least that or more.
 
christiefan915 said:
Damn that Obama. Born with a silver spoon in his mouth, educated in private schools and top tier universities, owner of how many failed businesses... what does he know about the rest of us peons?
Click to expand...
Good point, when applied to a man who adhered to Black Liberation Philosophy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top