The removal of Donald Trump from Twitter

Twitter=Deep state controlled propaganda, Disinformation, and opinion shaping racket. Until Musk stepped in that is. Could have told you Twitter was an op years ago as it was obvious but who would listen. People need to see things for themselves.

That is what 150 former intelligence officials and many others said about the Hunter Biden laptop stories. Turned out they were mostly right. So far, they have not found any involvement or wrongdoing by Joe but many people believe he committed some crime. Obviously social media spreads disinformation.
 
Gonna be an interesting January !

Since the house has no money to spend, no need spend time on spending bills. Its can be all investigations, all the time !

Can let the Pentagon see about trying all the traitors and not trouble the DoJ with it. Maybe they can set up a gallows and webcam so America can see how traitors are managed !
 
tenor.gif

:rofl2: :rofl2:
 
I am not the one who spelled "think" wrong...or who is to stupid to capitalize the first word in a sentence, AssWipe.

You misunderstood. That poster said the ayatollah was never banned. In fact, he was banned two years ago.

No he wasn't stop disseminating bullshit.

'Ban Khamenei from Twitter': Users tell Elon Musk
An online petition was started by Israeli-American journalist Emily Schrader and CEO of digital marketing agency Social Lite Creative, and other Twitter users

https://www.firstpost.com/world/ban-khamenei-from-twitter-users-tell-elon-musk-11611561.html

 
Twitter is a privately-owned and run corporation.
They should be able to ban or un-ban, ANYONE they wish.


Anyone who says otherwise is against free enterprise.

Period
.



Once again, I DESPISE, both parties.
 
Last edited:
I am not the one who spelled "think" wrong...or who is to stupid to capitalize the first word in a sentence, AssWipe.

Twitter is a privately-owned and run corporation.
They should be able to ban or un-ban ANYONE they wish.


Anyone who says otherwise is against free enterprise.

Period
.



Once again, I DESPISE, both parties.

If you extend that argument further then they ought to be able to ban gays, blacks or any political persuasion they don't like.

In law, there is a doctrine that essentially says if you open your business to the public, you are, for all intents and purposes, a quasi-public business, similar to the old “town square” where folks would go to let their voice be heard. If you become quasi-public, you also take on some important responsibilities, such as no longer being allowed to silence certain kinds of protected speech.
 
Twitter is a privately-owned and run corporation.
They should be able to ban or un-ban ANYONE they wish.


Anyone who says otherwise is against free enterprise.

Period
.



Once again, I DESPISE, both parties.

When it is controlled by government it is not free, Idiot.
 
That is what 150 former intelligence officials and many others said about the Hunter Biden laptop stories. Turned out they were mostly right. So far, they have not found any involvement or wrongdoing by Joe but many people believe he committed some crime. Obviously social media spreads disinformation.
no. those 51 were parroting the laptop story from NYPosts was "classic Russian disinformation"..it was NOT, and the FBI knew it was real because they had the laptop a year earlier.
Those 51 dweebs never even bothered to check with the NYPost to se the original documents.
They just Deep Stated it - political hacks
 
I am not the one who spelled "think" wrong...or who is to stupid to capitalize the first word in a sentence, AssWipe.

no. those 51 were parroting the laptop story from NYPosts was "classic Russian disinformation"..it was NOT, and the FBI knew it was real because they had the laptop a year earlier.
Those 51 dweebs never even bothered to check with the NYPost to se the original documents.
They just Deep Stated it - political hacks

Flash is just a flash in the pan!
 
Flash is just a flash in the pan!

The FBI had 15 ex members in Twitter management along with general counsel Baker who gave the go ahead to suppress by misrepresenting the Hunter laptop as "state actor " or "hacked" material

They knew it wasnt hacked.the FBI told FB also it was a "Russian dump" (large file)

They also were spying on Guillianai, so they knew when the NYP ( by reading texts from Guilliani to Miranda of NYP) was going to go public.

I think the 51 intelligence dweebs just went along for the ride
 
If you extend that argument further then they ought to be able to ban gays, blacks or any political persuasion they don't like.

In law, there is a doctrine that essentially says if you open your business to the public, you are, for all intents and purposes, a quasi-public business, similar to the old “town square” where folks would go to let their voice be heard. If you become quasi-public, you also take on some important responsibilities, such as no longer being allowed to silence certain kinds of protected speech.

No. Discrimination against protected groups is illegal whether you're privately held, publicly held, or in the public sector. That's why all corporations make their employees and managers undertake anti-discrimination and anti-harassment training.
 
If you extend that argument further then they ought to be able to ban gays, blacks or any political persuasion they don't like.
They can. Would have to use a different reason. Just being in one of the little leftist identity boxes doesn't exempt someone from being banned, fired, etc. from a private operation.
 
Twitter is a privately-owned and run corporation.
They should be able to ban or un-ban, ANYONE they wish.


Anyone who says otherwise is against free enterprise.

Period
.



Once again, I DESPISE, both parties.

Yes, Twitter should be free to ban or un-ban, should be seen as "free enterprise". Just don't make the mistake of seeing it as the "public square" it pretends to be.
 
Live by the sword die by the sword. :rofl2: :attaboy:

Yup, made a mistake...and did not proofread. Should not have made the mistake...and should have proofed the post before posting it.

I was wrong. And I acknowledged being wrong immediately.

That is what you two do when you are wrong...just acknowledge it, right?
 
Back
Top