Former Twitter CEO Dorsey caught RED-HANDED in perjury

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Guilty as hell but you can bet the dem-controlled DOJ will not charge him. Like our 50 million illegal aliens, democrats are above the law.

https://nypost.com/2022/12/10/jack-dorsey-told-congress-under-oath-twitter-was-not-shadow-banning/

Former Twitter boss Jack Dorsey once testified under oath in 2018 that his company never shadowbanned or censored conservative users.

The claims have blown up amid a series of disclosures by the company — now under new management by billionaire and free-speech advocate Elon Musk, who bought it in October — showing a systemic effort to silence prominent conservative voices on the platform.

Dorsey appeared before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on September 2018 to discuss “Transparency and Accountability” at the company. While there he came in for a grilling from GOP lawmakers.

“I want to read a few quotes about Twitter’s practices and I just want you to tell me if they’re true or not,” Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Penn.) said. “Social media is being rigged to censor conservatives. Is that true of Twitter?”

“No,” Dorsey responded.

“Are you censoring people?” Doyle followed.

“No,” Dorsey answered again.

“Twitter’s shadow-banning prominent Republicans… is that true?” Doyle followed.

“No,” Dorsey said a third time.

But in recent days Musk and journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss have released bombshell reports proving extensive political censorship at Twitter, based on a vast trove of internal documents.

“On its face, Dorsey has vulnerability after the latest release. Dorsey was repeatedly asked about censoring and shadow banning, which has now been confirmed in these files,” George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley told The Post.
Click to expand...
 
No, we dont know this, because we know that the WOKE Commissars took actions without the consent or knowledge of the corporate chain of command.
 
Bret said long ago "It is not clear that Jack knows what is going on in his own company (possibly paraphrase)".

He was clearly right yet again.
 
Jack only knew what he was told and he saw to it that he was told little to nothing.

So not perjury on his part but his lawyer sitting with him may not be so pristine.

Heads need to roll but he might escape it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top