Woke!

I didn't invent the slang.
I know.
The Black community did.
Thats nice.
You are a racist.
I know. I once advocated a healthy diet and have never repented.
And why the hell are you talking about "trashcan"?
He is the one who reinforced me being a racist for advocating a healthy diet. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?85435-Aloysious-Racist&p=2049399#post2049399 He started that thread after I got him banned from APP.
I have no idea who that fool is.
Now you know. But you are correct. He’s a fool. He rarely posts except in APP. Thinks he’s too good for the rest of us even though I got him banned from there.
 
I know. Thats nice.
I know. I once advocated a healthy diet and have never repented.
He is the one who reinforced me being a racist for advocating a healthy diet. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?85435-Aloysious-Racist&p=2049399#post2049399 He started that thread after I got him banned from APP.Now you know. But you are correct. He’s a fool. He rarely posts except in APP. Thinks he’s too good for the rest of us even though I got him banned from there.

There is no context. Try again.
 
The context is still not clear. What is your point of advocating healthy diet for the Black community?
I wasn’t. Nowhere is that said. I just advocated a healthy diet in general when stating Taoism concepts in DCJ, a now defunct forum. McSlobber and IQ64 said I was a racist for that. trashcan5 agreed (which is why he got banned from APP)
And you assuming I only advocated a healthy diet for blacks makes YOU the racist. As usual.
 
Last edited:
I wasn’t. Nowhere is that said. I just advocated a healthy diet in general when stating Taoism concepts in DCJ, a now defunct forum. McSlobber and IQ64 said I was a racist for that. trashcan5 agreed.
And you assuming I only advocated a healthy diet for blacks makes YOU the racist. As usual.

Assume? I can only attempt to get clues out of what little context there is.

So you advocate for a healthy diet for everyone and you claimed (no proof of that anywhere) that those people (Antifa) accused you of being a racist becausr of that with no reason at all.

1. Anonymoose advocates a healthy diet for everyone.
2. You claimed "they" accused you of being racist with zero proof or context.

Is that about the gist of it?
 
Assume? I can only attempt to get clues out of what little context there is.

So you advocate for a healthy diet for everyone and you claimed (no proof of that anywhere) that those people (Antifa) accused you of being a racist becausr of that with no reason at all.

1. Anonymoose advocates a healthy diet for everyone.
2. You claimed "they" accused you of being racist with zero proof or context.

Is that about the gist of it?
I thought it was in my links but I’ll summarize for you:
Back in the day in DCJ I stated that anyone (no mention of blacks) who followed tenets of Taoism, one of which was a healthy diet, their lives would be for the better.
McSlobber stated that was racist because the staple diet of blacks is fried chicken, fried catfish and chitlins, all presumably unhealthy. IQ64 agreed.
To advocate a healthy diet was therefore racist.
trashcan5 also agreed and badgered me for being a racist for that very same reason. Therefore he got kicked out of APP and subsequently started a thread about me. Pretty much out of character for him who considers himself quite the intellectual.
 
I thought it was in my links but I’ll summarize for you:
Back in the day in DCJ I stated that anyone (no mention of blacks) who followed tenets of Taoism, one of which was a healthy diet, their lives would be for the better.
McSlobber stated that was racist because the staple diet of blacks is fried chicken, fried catfish and chitlins, all presumably unhealthy. IQ64 agreed.
To advocate a healthy diet was therefore racist.
trashcan5 also agreed and badgered me for being a racist for that very same reason. Therefore he got kicked out of APP and subsequently started a thread about me. Pretty much out of character for him who considers himself quite the intellectual.

Okay cool story. Why should I care?
 
Okay cool story. Why should I care?

You shouldn’t but you asked.
So now you know why I’m rayciss for advocating a healthy diet. :)
BTW, not one leftist here has disagreed with that.
I guess they agree that blacks eat fried chicken and chitlins as their staple diet.
 
You shouldn’t but you asked.

I didn't. It was you who brought up "trashcan" and the claim that you were accused of racism as if it has any bearing with our discussion.

Now that your "cool story" is clarified, will you stop keep bringing it up?
 

Nope I didn't. I finally had to ask because you kept pushing that dumb story as if it means anything and as if it's relevant to our conversation.

Not until the lefties here repudiate it. Which they won’t. I really believe that they (and you, as one of them) believe their logic.
So I’ll continue to bring it up occasionally.

I still have no clue what your "story" is so for you to tell me that I believe their "logic" of a non existent "story" tells me all is needed about you.

Posters here, including you yourself, have accused me of being racist. Do you see me bringing that up all the time? No? Well then.
 
Nope I didn't. I finally had to ask
. So you admit you did ask. Good boy.

I still have no clue what your "story" is so for you to tell me that I believe their "logic" of a non existent "story"
How does it not exist? I just related it. That makes it exist. tells me all is needed about you.

Posters here, including you yourself, have accused me of being racist.
Either that or your logic of me being racist is upside down. Could be both, in which case you are definitely a racist.
Posters here, including you yourself, have accused me of being racist. Do you see me bringing that up all the time? No?.
Yes.
You have not shown me the history of "woke", racist.

We all do, including you. It’s the “go to” argument here. “You’re a racist because…. blah , blah”.
Diesel claims I’m a racist because I consider woke to be a dumb word.
The truth is, very few of us here are other tha TDAK et al.
 
. So you admit you did ask. Good boy.

No I didn't. Bad boy.

How does it not exist? I just related it. That makes it exist. tells me all is needed about you.

You made up the story.

Either that or your logic of me being racist is upside down. Could be both, in which case you are definitely a racist.


Nope. Stop lying.
You advocating healthy diet for everyone does not make you racist, dumbass. You lied and made up that story.

We all do, including you. It’s the “go to” argument here. “You’re a racist because…. blah , blah”.
Diesel claims I’m a racist because I consider woke to be a dumb word.
The truth is, very few of us here are other tha TDAK et al.

You were mocking Black people. Even going as far as mocking them for being illiterate and bad in English. That makes YOU racist. Deal with it.
 
.
Michael Shellenberger comes to the rescue!!

Wokeism Is A Poster

A little over a year ago, I flew from San Francisco to New York to speak at a book event with John McWhorter. HarperCollins had just published San Fransicko, and Penguin had just published McWhorter’s Woke Racism. In both Apocalypse Never and San Fransicko, I argue that progressive politics has become a religion. In Woke Racism, McWhorter argues the same thing.

Detecting a pattern, I opened up my journal and wrote a set of religious categories across the top, including “Original Sin,” “Guilty Devils,” “Myths,” and along the left-hand side wrote a set of progressive issue concerns: climate change, trans, crime, racism, etc. I started filling in each of the boxes with relative ease.

Upon landing, I transferred my rough notes to a Google Sheet and showed it to my friend Peter Boghossian. Peter immediately grew excited by the project and with the help of a few others, we spent the next few weeks filling out all of the boxes. Lo and behold, we discovered we had created a Woke Religion Taxonomy.

I wrote an article, “Why Wokeism Is a Religion,” to accompany the release of the taxonomy, and it was, until I wrote about the attack on Paul Pelosi, the most popular article on my Substack.

Many complained that they couldn’t read the Taxonomy because the type was too small, and they encouraged us to create a poster out of it. I’m happy to announce that we’ve done just that, and the poster came out looking great. We printed it on thick, high-quality paper that will last 100 years or longer.

Please consider buying one for yourself and giving away a few copies. It will make a great holiday gift for someone you love. If you like, I’ll sign it and dedicate it, too. Shoot me an email if you’d like me to write something specific. Othewise I’ll sign it over to you and use the email that you use through the Substack payment service, Stripe.

Figures YOU would take this clown seriously. Here's an appropriate take down of your hero:


Book review: Bad science and bad arguments abound in ‘Apocalypse Never’ by Michael Shellenberger
A new book that critiques environmentalism is ‘deeply and fatally flawed


https://yaleclimateconnections.org/...and-bad-arguments-abound-in-apocalypse-never/
 
Back
Top