Biden Suspicious Banking Activity Reports being hidden

ExpressLane said:
So now and investigation is proof? What happened with the Mueller investigation. Oh yeah there was no proof that Trump colluded.
Click to expand...

Dear fucking so low your ass scrapes the ground


I was proving he is being investigated lie bag

Fuck you very much
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I just explained it to you. The previous rules said Treasury would release any SAR congress wanted to any member of congress. Now they are saying they'll only do it if there is a "bipartisan" request from a committee.
Click to expand...

So let's see it. Link to the previous rules, link to the changed rules, and quote to us the differences between the two.
 
floridafan said:
I am just wondering why you are so fixated on Hunter Biden and not the $2 billion the Trumps son in law received from the Saudi's. Thats where you hypocrisy falls into place.
Click to expand...

Because Trump's son made that deal after Trump left office. At least Kushner has actual experience in real estate development, unlike Biden.

Aside from that, you are really only offering a tu quoque. Investigate Kushner thoroughly. Do the same to Biden. My bet is Bagman Biden will come up looking like Pigpen from the Peanuts cartoon. Bagman has no background in anything he was doing in business. He was trading totally on his father's name, while his father was in office.
 
Damocles said:
Yeah. The lefties want you to focus on the overtly partisan special prosecutor. Stop paying attention to actual evidence of crimes that they don't want you to investgate... you jerk.
Click to expand...

Exactly how does the left direct the focus of people who only consume right-wing info? Trump is in court for several crimes ranging from tax and loan schemes to planning an insurrection. The rightys have congress and they will embarrass themselves doing what you want. Do you just dismiss all that Trump has done? Can you whitewash what he did in Georgia asking the Secty of state to change the election results? Can you close your eyes to Trump's 1-6 insurrection that resulted in 150 injuries and some deaths? Trump's people tried to overthrow a fair and honest election, and you want us to ignore that? They created their own electors and wanted to replace the legal ones for them. Do you care about America at all?
 
Gondwanaland said:
So let's see it. Link to the previous rules, link to the changed rules, and quote to us the differences between the two.
Click to expand...

I gave a link earlier. You are just unsatisfied with my answer so you demand more proof. If I proffer it, you are unsatisfied with my answer, so you demand more proof. That's just a reductio ad absurdum. No matter how much proof I offer, your response will be to demand more.

Maybe you should start by parsing what proof I've given and offer a logical rebuttal instead.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I gave a link earlier. You are just unsatisfied with my answer so you demand more proof. If I proffer it, you are unsatisfied with my answer, so you demand more proof. That's just a reductio ad absurdum. No matter how much proof I offer, your response will be to demand more.

Maybe you should start by parsing what proof I've given and offer a logical rebuttal instead.
Click to expand...

No, you did not give a link showing the text of the suppose previous rule and the text of the supposed new rule.

Given your post here I will assume it is because you're a dumb cunt who made things up and now cannot support your claim.

PS: I suggest you go back to whatever school taught you about logical fallacies and get a refund because that's not remotely what a reductio ad absurdum is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top