The Verdict Is in on the ‘Top Secret’ Documents Seized by the FBI From President

She was more honest and infinitely more competent than Trump. But you are required to hate her...and that is you right.

Trump was an abomination as president.

No, she wasn't. The Hildabeast is one of the worst, if not the worst persons to run for President EVER! Trump may be a total asshole, a jerk, and a self-aggrandizing braggard, but he's not thoroughly corrupt to the bone like the Hildabeast is.
 
No, she wasn't. The Hildabeast is one of the worst, if not the worst persons to run for President EVER! Trump may be a total asshole, a jerk, and a self-aggrandizing braggard, but he's not thoroughly corrupt to the bone like the Hildabeast is.

Trump is more corrupt than almost anyone in the United States.

Hillary is more competent than Trump...and would have done better for the nation than Trump.

Sorry that bothers you...but that is so.
 
The Verdict Is in on the ‘Top Secret’ Documents Seized by the FBI From President Trump's Home

The Verdict Is in on the ‘Top Secret’ Documents Seized by the FBI From President Trump’s Home


Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter.



The Verdict Is in on the ‘Top Secret’ Documents Seized by the FBI From President Trump’s Home


Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter.
https://redstate.com/streiff/2022/1...ome-and-sane-people-are-not-surprised-n660319

THose are the documents they were able to examine. We don't know what other documents he stole that were in the empty folders, nor what other documents he stole that he is keeping in other properties.
 
The Verdict Is in on the ‘Top Secret’ Documents Seized by the FBI From President Trump's Home

The Verdict Is in on the ‘Top Secret’ Documents Seized by the FBI From President Trump’s Home


Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter.



The Verdict Is in on the ‘Top Secret’ Documents Seized by the FBI From President Trump’s Home


Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter.
https://redstate.com/streiff/2022/1...ome-and-sane-people-are-not-surprised-n660319

That blows up Espionage Act violations. All of those (except gross negligence)
require damaging the USA or advancing a foreign power's interest BY INTENT.
WAPO just showed there was no such intent buy Trump

So what are we now down to? PRA administrative law
 
Not sure why you say that. For certain Trump is the worst thing ever to happen to America...worse than our mid-19th century Civil War. And he was an abomination as a president...just as he is an abomination as a human being.
^^^^HAS the worst case of TDS on record^^^^
 
No, she wasn't. The Hildabeast is one of the worst, if not the worst persons to run for President EVER! Trump may be a total asshole, a jerk, and a self-aggrandizing braggard, but he's not thoroughly corrupt to the bone like the Hildabeast is.
Trump wanted to do right for the country. Hildabeast wanted to do right for herself.
 
Trump wanted to do right for the country. Hildabeast wanted to do right for herself.

Hahahahaha! Trump doesn't give a fucking shit about this country. Just like Hillary, he only gives a fuck about himself and how to enrich himself and how to inflate his ego even further.
 
She was fired from her position on the team investigating Richard Nixon over Watergate because she kept trying to get her fellow lawyers to use dirty tricks and lie to get Nixon.


That’s a new one to me, so I looked it up. I found this and similar:

Judiciary Committee pay records that were unearthed in 2016 by Washington Post researcher Alice Crites show that Clinton was paid through Sept. 4, 1974—after Nixon resigned on Aug. 9, 1974, and after the committee published its final impeachment report on Aug. 20, 1974.

We rate the claim that Hillary Clinton was fired from her job as a staff attorney during the during the Watergate investigation False.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...lary-clinton-wasnt-fired-during-watergate-in/

But one of her bosses certainly took a dislike to her, so we could say you’re half right. :)
 
That’s a new one to me, so I looked it up. I found this and similar:

Judiciary Committee pay records that were unearthed in 2016 by Washington Post researcher Alice Crites show that Clinton was paid through Sept. 4, 1974—after Nixon resigned on Aug. 9, 1974, and after the committee published its final impeachment report on Aug. 20, 1974.

We rate the claim that Hillary Clinton was fired from her job as a staff attorney during the during the Watergate investigation False.

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...lary-clinton-wasnt-fired-during-watergate-in/

But one of her bosses certainly took a dislike to her, so we could say you’re half right. :)

User Clip: Hillary's Bold Lie: Her Omission That She Was FIRED From Her Staff Position on the House Judiciary Committee to Impeach President Nixon

As a 27 year-old staff attorney for the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate investigation, Hillary Rodham was fired by her supervisor, Democrat Jerry Zeifman. When asked why Hillary Rodham was fired, Zeifman said in an interview, "Because she was a liar. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer, she conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the Committee, and the rules of confidentiality."
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4540...ff-position-house-judiciary-committee-impeach

I think C-Span is far, far more reliable than a hack "fact check" sight that regularly gets called out for its wrong fact checks. After all, politifact is nothing but a shill for the Democrat party.

I think the guy that fired her would know best about her firing.

Appointed to Staff of House Judiciary Committee during Watergate. She was "fired" for corrupt and unethical behavior, according to lifelong democrats in charge of the house investigation Dan Calbrese and Jerry Zeifman[1] Ziefman has since been smeared by the Hilary campaign machine (WaPo and Snopes), for the hairsplitting mistake that he technically he could not "fire her" (as she wasn't a direct report to his committee, he could only recommend she be removed). Also they claimed that all her unethical behavior might have been at the suggestion of her bosses (it's always someone else's fault).[2] The pattern of getting in the middle of scandals, being accused of questionable ethics by those closest to her, and "losing evidence" seemed to follow her through her life... along with her defenders making lame excuses for it.
https://igeek.com/Hillary_Clinton:_Fired_from_Watergate_(1974)

So, you have sites that favor and will cover for the Hildabeast saying one thing, and sites that are far more neutral saying something different. I guess you have to pick who you want to believe, "fact checkers" with obvious and inherent biases, or sites that are reporting the facts and letting you decide on your own...
 
If Hillary was fired, why was she still paid until Sept 4, 1974 - after the Nixon investigation was wound up? (That's not an opinion, it's a documented fact.)

From your link at igeek.com:
< according to lifelong democrats in charge of the house investigation Dan Calbrese and Jerry Zeifman... >

They mean Dan Calabrese, and he was in charge of nothing. He's a journalist who wrote an article about this in 2008. Zeifman is the one who allegedly fired Hillary, and he changed his story - first he said he wished he'd fired her (1999), then he said he had fired her (2008).

Still, I'm open to persuasion ...
 
Back
Top