Reminder: you need evidence for election fraud

BartenderElite

Verified User
Election fraud is a serious allegation.

There has to be more to it than "this seems pretty suspicious." I heard some conservatives in AZ are claming fraud because other Republicans did much better than Lake. I mean, how could that be? Every voter has to vote straight party-line like partisans do...right? No one actually thinks independently, and splits their vote among the parties?

And all the "he/she had bigger rallies/more Twitter followers/more enthusiasm!" is ridiculous. Has absolutely nothing to do w/ how people vote.

Also, just another reminder: Kari Lake lost to Katie Hobbs. The main reason she probably lost - aside from the fact that she lies a great deal of the time - is because she told a large segment of her own party to "get the hell out," and they did.
 
Election fraud is a serious allegation.

There has to be more to it than "this seems pretty suspicious." I heard some conservatives in AZ are claming fraud because other Republicans did much better than Lake. I mean, how could that be? Every voter has to vote straight party-line like partisans do...right? No one actually thinks independently, and splits their vote among the parties?

And all the "he/she had bigger rallies/more Twitter followers/more enthusiasm!" is ridiculous. Has absolutely nothing to do w/ how people vote.

Also, just another reminder: Kari Lake lost to Katie Hobbs. The main reason she probably lost - aside from the fact that she lies a great deal of the time - is because she told a large segment of her own party to "get the hell out," and they did.
McCain people, how stupid was that…
 
Election fraud is a serious allegation.

There has to be more to it than "this seems pretty suspicious." I heard some conservatives in AZ are claming fraud because other Republicans did much better than Lake. I mean, how could that be? Every voter has to vote straight party-line like partisans do...right? No one actually thinks independently, and splits their vote among the parties?

And all the "he/she had bigger rallies/more Twitter followers/more enthusiasm!" is ridiculous. Has absolutely nothing to do w/ how people vote.

Also, just another reminder: Kari Lake lost to Katie Hobbs. The main reason she probably lost - aside from the fact that she lies a great deal of the time - is because she told a large segment of her own party to "get the hell out," and they did.

Good luck with this one. All our MAGA members need to know is "they hate Biden so how could he have won?".

And that's it! No amount of hard evidence or lack thereof will convince them. I'm working on our MAGA members, coldjoint right now in another thread and getting nowhere.
 
Election fraud is a serious allegation.

There has to be more to it than "this seems pretty suspicious." I heard some conservatives in AZ are claming fraud because other Republicans did much better than Lake. I mean, how could that be? Every voter has to vote straight party-line like partisans do...right? No one actually thinks independently, and splits their vote among the parties?

And all the "he/she had bigger rallies/more Twitter followers/more enthusiasm!" is ridiculous. Has absolutely nothing to do w/ how people vote.

Also, just another reminder: Kari Lake lost to Katie Hobbs. The main reason she probably lost - aside from the fact that she lies a great deal of the time - is because she told a large segment of her own party to "get the hell out," and they did.

Strawman fallacies. Election fraud by Democrats occurred in AZ, including counting after hours without observers, machines that mysteriously 'failed' on election day, voting by people who aren't even citizens, mathematical improbabilities, etc.
 
Strawman fallacies. Election fraud by Democrats occurred in AZ, including counting after hours without observers, machines that mysteriously 'failed' on election day, voting by people who aren't even citizens, mathematical improbabilities, etc.

I wonder whose sock this one is.

:bigthink:
 
Strawman fallacies. Election fraud by Democrats occurred in AZ, including counting after hours without observers, machines that mysteriously 'failed' on election day, voting by people who aren't even citizens, mathematical improbabilities, etc.

Why is it a "mystery" why machines fail? There are hundreds of thousands of voting machines in America.

Do you think it's mysterious if there is anything but a 0% fail rate? Can you cite another mechanical device that has a 0% fail rate with such high frequency deployment and usage?
 
Strawman fallacies. Election fraud by Democrats occurred in AZ, including counting after hours without observers, machines that mysteriously 'failed' on election day, voting by people who aren't even citizens, mathematical improbabilities, etc.

Your opinion means nothing, you have no proof and never will.
 
Why is it a "mystery" why machines fail? There are hundreds of thousands of voting machines in America.

Do you think it's mysterious if there is anything but a 0% fail rate? Can you cite another mechanical device that has a 0% fail rate with such high frequency deployment and usage?

It wasn't just one or two machines, dumbass. No, you don't get to deny election fraud by Democrats that way!
 
Back
Top