I must say I am glad tomorrow is Election Day,

archives

Verified User
if I have to watch one more commercial, receive one more piece of literature, get another pop up on my phone, or robo calls, I think that would be it, at this point, it is nauseating.

And we can thank the Roberts Court’s Citizens United fiasco for it all. Anyone who doesn’t think foreign nations and entities are pouring millions into this or any election via secret donors is totally naive
 
We can certainly agree on not missing this barrage of useless information.

But if you think Citizens United was the beginning of foreign money, you are mistaken.

Sadly, there is zero chance that any legislation will ever get signed into law to return sanity into campaign spending.
 
We can certainly agree on not missing this barrage of useless information.

But if you think Citizens United was the beginning of foreign money, you are mistaken.

Sadly, there is zero chance that any legislation will ever get signed into law to return sanity into campaign spending.

Citizens United wasn’t the beginning, but it made it easier, secret and anonymous donors weren’t a thing prior to Citizens United
 
Citizens United wasn’t the beginning, but it made it easier, secret and anonymous donors weren’t a thing prior to Citizens United

Easier, yes. But its been a thing for quite a long time. Currying favor on an economy as big as ours has been worth wild for a long time.

But easier is better for them, certainly.
 
We can certainly agree on not missing this barrage of useless information.

But if you think Citizens United was the beginning of foreign money, you are mistaken.

Sadly, there is zero chance that any legislation will ever get signed into law to return sanity into campaign spending.

Sorry to disappoint you but the Democratic Party can fix the mess you made
 
Dark money
Article Talk
Language
Watch
Edit
For other uses, see Dark Money (disambiguation).
In the politics of the United States, dark money refers to spending to influence elections where the source of the money is not disclosed to voters. In the United States, groups that may spend on campaigns without disclosing who their donors are are some nonprofit organizations. The most common type of dark money group is the 501(c)(4) (often called social welfare organizations).[3][4] Such organizations can receive unlimited donations from corporations, individuals and unions. Proponents of dark money maintain it is protected under the First Amendment, while critics complain recipients of dark money (as with any contribution) "knows exactly who he owes a favor", but voters are kept in the dark about connections between donor and politician when favors are paid back.[5] Dark money first entered politics with Buckley v. Valeo (1976), when the United States Supreme Court laid out "Eight Magic Words" that define the difference between electioneering and issue advocacy -- exempting the latter from election finance laws. Dark spending increased from less than $5.2 million in 2006 to well over $300 million in the 2012 presidential cycle, and more than $174 million in the 2014 midterms,[3] $216 in the 2014 midterm elections,[5] The 2010 landmark case, Citizens United v. FEC, marked the turning point when dark money contributions surged, and some political groups began contending that they were not required to register with the FEC as any sort of PAC because their primary purpose was something other than electoral politics.[6]
 
if I have to watch one more commercial, receive one more piece of literature, get another pop up on my phone, or robo calls, I think that would be it, at this point, it is nauseating.

And we can thank the Roberts Court’s Citizens United fiasco for it all. Anyone who doesn’t think foreign nations and entities are pouring millions into this or any election via secret donors is totally naive
I bet it hurts enduring all that while knowing you are going to get shellacked.
 
Easier, yes. But its been a thing for quite a long time. Currying favor on an economy as big as ours has been worth wild for a long time.

But easier is better for them, certainly.

Never been done on the level it is now, preciously it was illegal for a candidate to accept illegal money, now, with secret donors, anything goes
 
I bet it hurts enduring all that while knowing you are going to get shellacked.

“I am going to get shellacked?”

Sorry pal, I have a life, and seemingly unlike you, it doesn’t revolve around who gets elected to what, I have already lived thru all kinds of power changes, and before I die, I am sure I will love thru quite a few more
 
Never been done on the level it is now, preciously it was illegal for a candidate to accept illegal money, now, with secret donors, anything goes

making it easier has certainly opened the floodgates (look at published numbers on 2022 campaign spending) but just because it was harder doesn't mean it didn't occur and in rather large quantities.
 
r
“I am going to get shellacked?”

Sorry pal, I have a life, and seemingly unlike you, it doesn’t revolve around who gets elected to what, I have already lived thru all kinds of power changes, and before I die, I am sure I will love thru quite a few more

:laugh: Classic "The grapes were sour anyway" statement.:rofl2: Enjoy tomorrow because you deserve it. ;).
 
Our old republic is toast,
and instead of figuring out how to replace it,
we're wasting our time trying to save it in two totally different ways,
neither of which can possibly succeed.

Partition or dystopia--that's our REAL choice.
 
Our old republic is toast,
and instead of figuring out how to replace it,
we're wasting our time trying to save it in two totally different ways,
neither of which can possibly succeed.

Partition or dystopia--that's our REAL choice.

Read history idiot



It’s not over you silly Russian
 
Back
Top