HOUSE POLITBURO IS TERRIFIED OF TRUMP TESTIFYING LIVE BEFORE AMERICA

Flash said:
Not according to the WI Supreme Court. Violating a state law does not violate the constitution (state or U. S.).

Again, try reading the decision.
Click to expand...

why do you keep whining......I've already proved you are a mindless fool.....it's unconstitutional....according to the WI SC.....regardless of how hard you deny it......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
why do you keep whining......I've already proved you are a mindless fool.....it's unconstitutional....according to the WI SC.....regardless of how hard you deny it......
Click to expand...

You idiot. You proved nothing other than you have not read the WI court case and have no clue what it says. Out of 68 court cases about the election not one said anything was unconstitutional.

We are still waiting for you to show one case where a court said anything was unconstitutional. Illegal is not the same thing.

We are still waiting for you to name one county that had more votes than registered voters.

Repeating a lie does not make it true, something you and Trump have not learned.
 
Flash said:
You idiot. You proved nothing other than you have not read the WI court case and have no clue what it says. Out of 68 court cases about the election not one said anything was unconstitutional.

We are still waiting for you to show one case where a court said anything was unconstitutional. Illegal is not the same thing.

We are still waiting for you to name one county that had more votes than registered voters.

Repeating a lie does not make it true, something you and Trump have not learned.
Click to expand...

for the third or fourth time.....the US Constitution provides that only the state legislature can set the rules for an election......The WI court found that the WI election was conducted in a way which was not set by the state legislature......this is per se a violation of the US constitution.......you don't care, we understand that.....but it doesn't change the fact that the Pasty Faced Pedophile is the first man put in office by an election not conducted in accordance with the constitution.......that will still be true long after you and I die......in my case of old age, in your case the result of an unfortunate accident resulting from some random, stupid act that you should have avoided......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
for the third or fourth time.....the US Constitution provides that only the state legislature can set the rules for an election......The WI court found that the WI election was conducted in a way which was not set by the state legislature......this is per se a violation of the US constitution.......you don't care, we understand that.....but it doesn't change the fact that the Pasty Faced Pedophile is the first man put in office by an election not conducted in accordance with the constitution.......that will still be true long after you and I die......in my case of old age, in your case the result of an unfortunate accident resulting from some random, stupid act that you should have avoided......
Click to expand...

You think this was the first time a state did not follow all of the rules established by the legislature for an election? Study some history--and none of those found the election to be unconstitutional.

We are still waiting for you to show us where the WI Supreme Court ruled the 2020 election was unconstitutional. You cannot because they never made such a ruling. Hint: You have to read it first, but that would destroy your fantasy.

It was also the first time a president tried to violate the Constitution by attempting to overturn an election.
 
Last edited:
Flash said:
You think this was the first time a state did not follow all of the rules established by the legislature for an election? Study some history--and none of those found the election to be unconstitutional.
Click to expand...

you are welcome to present any evidence you have.....

It was also the first time a president tried to violate the Constitution by attempting to overturn an election.
Click to expand...

you are welcome to present any evidence you have.....
 
Last edited:
my work here appears to be done......Flash is reduced to recycling his failed attempts at disruption and even TL is supporting my proofs.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Same state, same system, same problem. Post #173

But your willful ignorance won't let you see beyond your Maga myopia, and you'll just parrot the SOS ad nausea.

Funny how you intellectually impotent MAGA minions are always projecting your short comings onto others.
Click to expand...



point taken......again it was the WEC trying to do something not allowed under state law......they were again stopped.....thanks!
Click to expand...

What are you, 10 years old? Do you actually think your childish editing wins you "points"? Or are you demonstrating how limited your reading comrehension and cognitive reasoning skills are.

You keep repeting something that you cannot prove....as Flash pointed out in Posts #191 & #191, your statement couldn't be proven by a court of law or in the Constitution. YOU PRODUCE NOTHING BUT A FAILED MAGA TALKING POINT REPEATED AD NAUSEA.

Not surprising. Carry on.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
my work here appears to be done......Flash is reduced to recycling his failed attempts at disruption and even TL is supporting my proofs.....
Click to expand...

And there you have it, dear readers. This Post Modern Fool is so insecure that he can't stand being logically and factually proven wrong on any point. So he just brays his revisionism to cover his failures, then scurries away, secure in his fantasy. But the chronology of the posts (like sunlight to a vampire for folk like PMP) will always be his undoing to the objective, rational and logical reader. Sad, but not unexpected.
 
Taichiliberal said:
What are you, 10 years old? Do you actually think your childish editing wins you "points"? Or are you demonstrating how limited your reading comrehension and cognitive reasoning skills are.

You keep repeting something that you cannot prove....as Flash pointed out in Posts #191 & #191, your statement couldn't be proven by a court of law or in the Constitution. YOU PRODUCE NOTHING BUT A FAILED MAGA TALKING POINT REPEATED AD NAUSEA.

Not surprising. Carry on.
Click to expand...

odd....first time in my life I found you saying something right and you deny you said it........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
What are you, 10 years old? Do you actually think your childish editing wins you "points"? Or are you demonstrating how limited your reading comrehension and cognitive reasoning skills are.

You keep repeting something that you cannot prove....as Flash pointed out in Posts #191 & #191, your statement couldn't be proven by a court of law or in the Constitution. YOU PRODUCE NOTHING BUT A FAILED MAGA TALKING POINT REPEATED AD NAUSEA.

Not surprising. Carry on.
Click to expand...


odd....first time in my life I found you saying something right and you deny you said it........
Click to expand...

Stop BS'ing, man! Name the post number where this happened (easy enough to do). All you've agreed upon is my not voting for Biden, because we all know damned well you can't/won't agree with me on anything else in our exchanges. If you insist on claiming otherwise without proof, that makes you a liar and put right back on the ignore list.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top