David Paterson Does the Right Thing and Drops the Rock

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
Today is a historic day for New York, the day that the Rockefeller Drug Law reforms kicked in, setting in motion the release of 1,500 low-level nonviolent drug offenders. The new law also gives judicial discretion back to judges, who can now determine whether someone should get treatment for their addiction instead of a jail cell.

I went to Brooklyn's Supreme Court and attended a public event to mark the milestone. The court room was full of activists, politicians and service providers that have been working for years to make this reform happen.

As an activist who has felt the sting of the Rockefeller laws firsthand -- serving 12 years under a 15-years-to-life sentence for a first time nonviolent offense -- I understand the full meaning of these changes. For years the Rockefeller Drug Laws became a political hot potato that was thoroughly debated, but nothing was ever done. Bills were submitted, arguments were made and each political party blamed the other for the impasse. In the meantime, those imprisoned were rotting away in the gulags of New York state. No better off were the family members of the incarcerated, whose hopes and aspirations slowly died as nothing was done.

Governor Paterson deserves thanks and praise for getting the job done. He has been instrumental and worked tirelessly, first as a state senator from Harlem and then as governor, to make these reforms happen. He said that "today was a day for second chances." For me, the governor's statement summed up the purpose of the new reforms. For years the Rockefeller Drug Laws were a symbol of a purely punitive approach to the problems of the drug war in New York state, one based on the archaic and outdated criminal justice mentality of "lock 'em up and throw away the key." Now, under the guidance of Governor Paterson, New York has abandoned that failed strategy and committed itself to a new approach that emphasizes addiction treatment instead of incarceration.

Now that the laws have been reformed, we have to make sure the changes are done right. Advocates and service providers have jumped in and have been working diligently to prepare for implementation. Legal aid and public defender agencies are providing legal counsel. Hundreds of social service agencies around the state have volunteered to provide a broad range of services to individuals who will be released from prison as a result of drug law reform. In New York City alone, more than 100 social service groups have agreed to work with legal aid and public defender agencies to provide services such as housing, job training and drug treatment to people returning from prison as a result of the reform.

For 35 years, New York was known as the state with the worst drug laws. It's time to change directions and make New York known for having the best practices, based on public health and safety.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anthony-papa/david-paterson-does-the-r_b_313058.html

Good for Patterson .. who Obama doesn't want to see re-elected.
 
Luv it
I'm saying Obama has indeed change the climate a lot.
When he said he wanted to decrim on the campaign trail, and then to have Holder say he would not use fed funds to raid Cali people following state law that kicked it up another notch. NAWLINS is one of the most assbackwards places in the country and even they are looking to go parking ticket for MJ possession.
 
Luv it
I'm saying Obama has indeed change the climate a lot.
When he said he wanted to decrim on the campaign trail, and then to have Holder say he would not use fed funds to raid Cali people following state law that kicked it up another notch. NAWLINS is one of the most assbackwards places in the country and even they are looking to go parking ticket for MJ possession.

Obama is against David Patterson and I'm betting that he is against ending draconian Rockefeller drug laws.
 
Today is a historic day for New York, the day that the Rockefeller Drug Law reforms kicked in, setting in motion the release of 1,500 low-level nonviolent drug offenders. The new law also gives judicial discretion back to judges, who can now determine whether someone should get treatment for their addiction instead of a jail cell.

I went to Brooklyn's Supreme Court and attended a public event to mark the milestone. The court room was full of activists, politicians and service providers that have been working for years to make this reform happen.

As an activist who has felt the sting of the Rockefeller laws firsthand -- serving 12 years under a 15-years-to-life sentence for a first time nonviolent offense -- I understand the full meaning of these changes. For years the Rockefeller Drug Laws became a political hot potato that was thoroughly debated, but nothing was ever done. Bills were submitted, arguments were made and each political party blamed the other for the impasse. In the meantime, those imprisoned were rotting away in the gulags of New York state. No better off were the family members of the incarcerated, whose hopes and aspirations slowly died as nothing was done.

Governor Paterson deserves thanks and praise for getting the job done. He has been instrumental and worked tirelessly, first as a state senator from Harlem and then as governor, to make these reforms happen. He said that "today was a day for second chances." For me, the governor's statement summed up the purpose of the new reforms. For years the Rockefeller Drug Laws were a symbol of a purely punitive approach to the problems of the drug war in New York state, one based on the archaic and outdated criminal justice mentality of "lock 'em up and throw away the key." Now, under the guidance of Governor Paterson, New York has abandoned that failed strategy and committed itself to a new approach that emphasizes addiction treatment instead of incarceration.

Now that the laws have been reformed, we have to make sure the changes are done right. Advocates and service providers have jumped in and have been working diligently to prepare for implementation. Legal aid and public defender agencies are providing legal counsel. Hundreds of social service agencies around the state have volunteered to provide a broad range of services to individuals who will be released from prison as a result of drug law reform. In New York City alone, more than 100 social service groups have agreed to work with legal aid and public defender agencies to provide services such as housing, job training and drug treatment to people returning from prison as a result of the reform.

For 35 years, New York was known as the state with the worst drug laws. It's time to change directions and make New York known for having the best practices, based on public health and safety.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anthony-papa/david-paterson-does-the-r_b_313058.html

Good for Patterson .. who Obama doesn't want to see re-elected.

Glad to see New York making some progress.
 
Obama said "yes I inhaled frequently, that was the point".
A lot will change and Has changed. We both know the powerful are not going to just let go overnight. More has changed in MJ liberalization since he took office than the 8yrs prior. My thoughts are it's way down on his list and it's something the rightwing nazi's would try to beat him over the head with if he were staunchly supporting. I think he's happy to let the grass roots movements grow in power and let Holder pull back the NAZI ahh DEA reigns.
 
Obama said "yes I inhaled frequently, that was the point".
A lot will change and Has changed. We both know the powerful are not going to just let go overnight. More has changed in MJ liberalization since he took office than the 8yrs prior. My thoughts are it's way down on his list and it's something the rightwing nazi's would try to beat him over the head with if he were staunchly supporting. I think he's happy to let the grass roots movements grow in power and let Holder pull back the NAZI ahh DEA reigns.

My brother .. what part of this don't you understand .. OBAMA OPPOSES PATTERSON.

Where is the difficulty?

Drug laws may indeed change, but it won't have shit to do with Obama who is going to sit on the sidelines. Obama had NOTHING to do with this .. and in fact, Eric Holder has long been a PROPONENT of the Rockefeller laws.
 
again grasshopper you must learn to not just stay down in the weeds.
Look at the big picture, his stance has changed the mj liberalization movement more than anything in a decade. I don't think that's even disputable.
 
again grasshopper you must learn to not just stay down in the weeds.
Look at the big picture, his stance has changed the mj liberalization movement more than anything in a decade. I don't think that's even disputable.

His stance on what?

He doesn't have a stance on anything .. other than getting elected.

His rhetoric-driven mindfuck inspired a nation that was sick to death of a hapless non-English speaking George Bush. Obama jumped on everything that was wrong with Bush and created an image that was the opposite of everything Bush.

How many do you think still believe he is everything not Bush? Only morons believe that bullshit.

In the end, his failures to get anything done may be the worst thing that could have happened to the progressive movement.
 
Grasshopper anger is a killer emotion.
Fact, Obama took action by saying DEA raids on state approved dispenceries would stop. Now your not obsessed with this issue like me but that was a SIESMIC SHIFT in policy.
 
Grasshopper anger is a killer emotion.
Fact, Obama took action by saying DEA raids on state approved dispenceries would stop. Now your not obsessed with this issue like me but that was a SIESMIC SHIFT in policy.

For you good brother ...

Obama’s big Paterson blunder

The White House stepped in it when it began to pressure New York Gov. David Paterson, a Democrat, to bow out of the 2010 governor’s race. As of now, Gov. Paterson’s decision to stick with his re-election plans creates a daily embarrassment for the White House, and a schism for Republicans to exploit. Last night, a panel on the Sean Hannity Show used the flap to play up Obama’s machiavellian streak and lack of party loyalty.

More than any other political incident of Obama’s first year, his betrayal of Gov. Paterson takes the mask off on the president’s claim to a higher ethical and moral standard in politics. The mistaken political calculus behind this has nothing to do with Gov. Paterson’s ethnicity or the fact he’s legally blind. It’s simply foolish for the Obama administration to let go one of its own when there’s so much partisan battling going on nationally.
In fact, trying to nudge aside Paterson, New York’s first black governor, may have already backfired politically within the Empire State. A poll of New Yorkers cited by David Gregory on Sunday’s “Meet the Press” found 62 percent of New Yorkers disagree with the White House decision to intervene. Not only that, but Rep. Charlie Rangel of Harlem also lashed back: “The whole thing to me was not presidential,” Rangel said to the Daily News. “It wasn’t good for the President, and it wasn’t good for the governor.”

With Democrats divided, Republicans will find it easier to retake this key governorship next year. If Paterson does ultimately step aside in favor of Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, the new candidate will have a hard time finding his footing with political blood on the floor.

It’s true Paterson faces abysmally low poll numbers. But he took the reins of the state’s governorship after former Gov. Eliot Spitzer resigned in the prostitution scandal, and just as New York’s economy tumbled into the abyss. Not only that, but Gov. Paterson faced an in-house mutiny in the state legislature. None of this is Paterson’s fault.

An economic recovery next year could have easily resuscitated his poll numbers. But now, New York’s fickle voters already have watched Obama hypocritically call Paterson a “wonderful man,” even after having signed off on his political death sentence. Next year, New Yorkers may turn aside from all the Democrats– Obama, Cuomo, even Paterson– in disgust.
http://trueslant.com/marceloballve/...d-trying-to-push-new-york-gov-paterson-aside/

This is what Obambi is doing for the progressive movement.
 
I could give two shits about Patterson, and I know there was plenty dirt that came out on him. If Obama calculated he didn't like the dirt fine.
I'm not going against Obama for something that was hunderds of items down the priority list. Now if he keeps up the occupations and killing thousands of muslims then fuck him.
 
I could give two shits about Patterson, and I know there was plenty dirt that came out on him. If Obama calculated he didn't like the dirt fine.
I'm not going against Obama for something that was hunderds of items down the priority list. Now if he keeps up the occupations and killing thousands of muslims then fuck him.

By the way .. do you have the one and only Rick James Concert DVD that was filmed in Germany?

Not the greatest sound quality, not the worst either .. but it was done in 1982 when he was happy and on top of the world.

I'm sure that with you being his white alter-ego and everyting you'll love it as much as I do. :0)
 
By the way .. do you have the one and only Rick James Concert DVD that was filmed in Germany?

Not the greatest sound quality, not the worst either .. but it was done in 1982 when he was happy and on top of the world.

I'm sure that with you being his white alter-ego and everyting you'll love it as much as I do. :0)

I might check it out as I like your taste, I was using the tag as more of a kudo's to Dave Chapelle
 
I could give two shits about Patterson, and I know there was plenty dirt that came out on him. If Obama calculated he didn't like the dirt fine.
I'm not going against Obama for something that was hunderds of items down the priority list. Now if he keeps up the occupations and killing thousands of muslims then fuck him.

Wait a damn minute :0) .. how could you not give two fucks about a politician who has the balls to address your number one issue?
 
I might check it out as I like your taste, I was using the tag as more of a kudo's to Dave Chapelle

I know your were saluting Chapelle, but you're a brother ain't you? :0)

You know you like Rick James.

You might also want to get George Clinton: Mothership Connection .. when he was landing the big ass mothership on stage nd firing up the doobie, giving shotguns, while they performed.
 
Wait a damn minute :0) .. how could you not give two fucks about a politician who has the balls to address your number one issue?

My bad you know I suck at debating. I luv anybody who's for the freedom of God's/Jah's plant.
I mean the decision of Obama too him.
 
I know your were saluting Chapelle, but you're a brother ain't you? :0)

You know you like Rick James.

You might also want to get George Clinton: Mothership Connection .. when he was landing the big ass mothership on stage nd firing up the doobie, giving shotguns, while they performed.

I'm a brother in spirit, if you saw me dance you'd disown me.:clink:
 
I'm a brother in spirit, if you saw me dance you'd disown me.:clink:

:lmao:

.. you funny

Here's a secret .. I bet you can dance better than my brother.

I may lose my card for this but .. <whisper> all black people can't dance.

:0)

... you still a brother.
 
:lmao:

.. you funny

Here's a secret .. I bet you can dance better than my brother.

I may lose my card for this but .. <whisper> all black people can't dance.

:0)

... you still a brother.

No but most white people can't. LOL
Is Samuel L Jackson the coolest guy ever or maybe Dave Chapelle
 
Today is a historic day for New York, the day that the Rockefeller Drug Law reforms kicked in, setting in motion the release of 1,500 low-level nonviolent drug offenders. The new law also gives judicial discretion back to judges, who can now determine whether someone should get treatment for their addiction instead of a jail cell.

I went to Brooklyn's Supreme Court and attended a public event to mark the milestone. The court room was full of activists, politicians and service providers that have been working for years to make this reform happen.

As an activist who has felt the sting of the Rockefeller laws firsthand -- serving 12 years under a 15-years-to-life sentence for a first time nonviolent offense -- I understand the full meaning of these changes. For years the Rockefeller Drug Laws became a political hot potato that was thoroughly debated, but nothing was ever done. Bills were submitted, arguments were made and each political party blamed the other for the impasse. In the meantime, those imprisoned were rotting away in the gulags of New York state. No better off were the family members of the incarcerated, whose hopes and aspirations slowly died as nothing was done.

Governor Paterson deserves thanks and praise for getting the job done. He has been instrumental and worked tirelessly, first as a state senator from Harlem and then as governor, to make these reforms happen. He said that "today was a day for second chances." For me, the governor's statement summed up the purpose of the new reforms. For years the Rockefeller Drug Laws were a symbol of a purely punitive approach to the problems of the drug war in New York state, one based on the archaic and outdated criminal justice mentality of "lock 'em up and throw away the key." Now, under the guidance of Governor Paterson, New York has abandoned that failed strategy and committed itself to a new approach that emphasizes addiction treatment instead of incarceration.

Now that the laws have been reformed, we have to make sure the changes are done right. Advocates and service providers have jumped in and have been working diligently to prepare for implementation. Legal aid and public defender agencies are providing legal counsel. Hundreds of social service agencies around the state have volunteered to provide a broad range of services to individuals who will be released from prison as a result of drug law reform. In New York City alone, more than 100 social service groups have agreed to work with legal aid and public defender agencies to provide services such as housing, job training and drug treatment to people returning from prison as a result of the reform.

For 35 years, New York was known as the state with the worst drug laws. It's time to change directions and make New York known for having the best practices, based on public health and safety.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anthony-papa/david-paterson-does-the-r_b_313058.html

Good for Patterson .. who Obama doesn't want to see re-elected.

This pattern is becoming a bit disturbing to me.... but again, I agree with you...

now I must go cleanse myself....
 
Back
Top