Bill Maher gets it right!

domer76 said:
Your party has been taken over by a sociopathic, narcissistic, pathological liar. A true enemy of democracy. A good number, perhaps a majority, of your candidates are “stolen election” conspiracists.

Look at the right wingers who post on this forum. They go out of their way to find ANYTHING anti-homosexual, anti-minority, etc.

So, you really have no ground on which to stand.
Click to expand...

Thank you very little for that completely insane, meaningless, rant...
 
Taichiliberal said:
Leave it to a MAGA minion to tack on his exaggerated, partisan mental flatulence to something that is pretty objective and not very flattering to either political party.

Grow the fuck up, will ya T.A.? Between Dump and Walker, the GOP is heavily relying on voter suppression tactics and gerry mandering....with the MSM trying to hype itself as a determiner for the up coming elections. The GOP's sweat'in, your BS non-withstanding.
Click to expand...

There is no gerrymandering in a Senate race.
 
Maher still believes in a unified, 50-state America, which Is why I know longer watch Real Time.
He has the common American weakness of not accepting reality.
 
LurchAddams said:
No, but yours has advised us not to make any sudden moves around you - you'll compulsively shit your pants and laundry day at your institution isn't 'till Wednesday.
Click to expand...

I know, right?.......it's a pain when you get so old that ROFL at dumbfuck lib'ruls can result in an accident........
 
LurchAddams said:
I mean, the Democrats are not putting up anyone I'm aware of who would force a little girl to carry a rape baby to term. The Dems are NOT the extreme ones here. TA's either trolling or is just too lazy to learn anything about any of the candidates. Again, he thinks 1/6 was a peaceful tour where no one go hurt. The rest of us have eyes and ears and can process information. TA cannot, unfortunately.

Ultimately, what TA's doing is what all fascists have done since Hitler. Scapegoating. He wants to make Democrats responsible for the garbage candidates the GOP picked. Such pussies, today's fascist twumptards. They take responsibility for nothing.
Click to expand...

Don't hold back, let us know how you REALLY feel! ;)
 
Flash said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Leave it to a MAGA minion to tack on his exaggerated, partisan mental flatulence to something that is pretty objective and not very flattering to either political party.

Grow the fuck up, will ya T.A.? Between Dump and Walker, the GOP is heavily relying on voter suppression tactics and gerry mandering....with the MSM trying to hype itself as a determiner for the up coming elections. The GOP's sweat'in, your BS non-withstanding.
Click to expand...


There is no gerrymandering in a Senate race.
Click to expand...

But there is voter suppression tactics. As for gerrymandering, there was at one point in our history:

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2019/05/08/how-republicans-gerrymandered-the-senate/
 
LurchAddams said:
Bill Maher lost his Disney, "Politically Incorrect" show a couple of decades ago because after 9/11, he called the terrorists who flew planes to buildings and killed thousands of Americans, "brave". It was an idiotic thing to say, and really poorly timed and he lost his show because of it.

So now he picks on Democrats, because he blames "the looney left" for his own brain fart.

There can be no justification for the shit show clown car of candidates like Walker, Oz, Mastriano, etc. NONE.

Bill Maher needs to get past his war with "the woke". He deserved to lose his show and he's lucky to get another one. He needs to get past it.
Click to expand...

Beg to differ. What Maher did was speak truth to jingoism. Calling the 9/11 terrorist and avowed jihadists "cowards" constantly was and is popular, but not wholly accurate. As Maher said, strapping a bomb to yourself to get at your perceived enemy takes guts, but dropping a bomb on someone from 30,000 ft. is cowardly in comparison (especially if your opponent does not have an air force or any effective anti-aircraft weaponry).

Poorly timed, but true none-the-less. Like the old saying goes, "truth hurts".

Mahr does not "pick on Democrats" in so much as point out instances of political incompetency and sometimes the sheer absurd BS that is tolerated for votes. He's not justifying the GOP's recent choices, he's saying DON'T DO STUPID SHIT THAT WILL GIVE THEM ANY EXCUSE. His example of the pneumatic transvestite teacher is a perfect example.

Truth hurts.
 
Life is Golden said:
Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
"Part of the appeal of a Herschel Walker or a Donald Trump or any number of egregious a–holes Republicans have backed is, in their mind, the worse a candidate is, the more it says to Democrats, 'Do you see how much we don't like what you are selling? All that socialism and identity politics and victimhood and oversensitivity and cancel culture and white self-loathing and forcing complicated ideas about race and sex on kids too young to understand it. Literally anything would be better than that.' That's their view.".
Click to expand...



The man is brilliant. Always has been.
Click to expand...

To whom are you referring to?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
What you miss is that the individual Democrat or Republican isn't the real issue. It's where the party as a whole is headed. The Democrats are racing to the radical Left. The older Republicans like McCain, Romney, Cheney, etc., still think they can negotiate with a Democrat party that no longer believes in negotiation. The result has become an increasing number of people in the Center and on the Right have moved their support towards Republicans willing to fight the Democrats rather than negotiate with them.

The Democrat (Leftist) response to that is not to try and engage in debate or compromise but to shift to ad hominem, insults, and lies to smear their opponents as completely and thoroughly as they can all the while defending their own positions mostly by trying to discredit the opposition.

Some examples:

Socialism is brought up. The Left will say stuff like, What's wrong with helping people? They will then attack the opposition relentlessly, You hate people! You don't care about others! that sort of thing.

On identity politics, the Left couches their defense in terms of the opposition being racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. It's a case of smearing the opposition as haters rather than doing anything to bolster their own position.

The Woke and cancel culture are just other forms of attack on the opposition. They do nothing to explain, rationalize, or support their own positions on anything.

Even Maher will get this sort of pushback from the Left simply for not wholeheartedly and completely agreeing with them. Putting in a statement like "That's their view..." and giving the opposition to the Left even a tiny bit of wiggle room is not acceptable to the totalitarian impulses of the Left.

For the non-Left, the result is they will vote for virtually anyone not on the Left. For the non-Left, it's a case of At least that guy (the non-Leftist) isn't a totalitarian asshole bent on taking everything I own and putting me in prison for opening my mouth...

The Left never gets it. They never see they are their own worst enemy and the harder they push, the harder the pushback becomes.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: :bs:
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yep.

He is for:

Socialized healthcare
Fixing elections so his party will stay in power (examples: HB1 For the Voters Act, or John Lewis Voting Act)
All for the greentard energy platform and related issues.
Veiled support for the defund the police movement
For free college
Wants public schools with few or no alternatives
Wants public schools to be daycare centers with things like free meals and all-day kindergarten
Fully onboard with the LGBTPDQRSTU agenda
Abortion on demand without restriction
Open borders

Basically a straight laundry list of radical Leftist ideas.

https://warnockforgeorgia.com/issues/
Click to expand...

Since you supplied the link, you should be able to copy and paste the passages that support your editorialized items in no uncertain terms. From the horses mouth, so to speak, and not from a horse's ass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top